1. f FNAL Hugh Montgomery Fermilab October, 2005

2. f October20,22, 20052Collider International Finance Committees New Director Pier Oddone –July 1, 2005 Organization –Some changes in the organization Nagaitsev: Recycler  ILC Shiltsev: Tevatron  LHC (New Head: Ron Moore) Kephart: TD  ILC Program Director Directions –Maintain the ships of the line (CDF, D0, CMS/LHC, MINOS, MiniBooNE) –ILC –Neutrinos NovA Proton Driver (Proton Plan on steroids)

3. f October20,22, 20053Collider International Finance Committees The outside world Operations Review (March 29-31) Annual Program Review (May 24-26) –Praised the collider program Physics Advisory Committee (June) HEPAP (July) –Manpower Study P5 (September)

4. f October20,22, 20054Collider International Finance Committees With P5: Management Experiment (FNAL) Budgets –Experiment Operating Budgets –Computing Budgets Experiment MOUs –  2002 –  2004,5 –  2006,7 recent development International Finance Committees –Commitments to experiment operating –Contributions to computing –Effort and participation

5. f October20,22, 20055Collider International Finance Committees With P5 Developments over past year HEPAP study –FNAL provided “PI” input for all the FNAL experiments –Developed transition plan for post-docs with a slight increase over a couple of years –Physicists Based view of FNAL physicists on a name-by- name assessment Checked with group leaders

6. f October20,22, 20056Collider International Finance Committees With P5: Collider Experiment Task Force Director charged a Task Force –Chair: Joel Butler- Associate Head of PPD “for experiments” –Membership from Laboratory and from Experiments plus a Co- Chair of the HEPAP Study. … would like to hear an interim report from the committee by September 7 prior to the P5 Meeting at Fermilab on September 12, 13.

7. f October20,22, 20057Collider International Finance Committees Collider Experiment Task Force Charge –review what is known about the scientific and technical needs for completing the Tevatron program through 2009. –choose its own methodology parse the total demands into segments partition easily understood segments from the more difficult make use of existing data from the HEPAP study, from the effort within the experiments Scrub needs should be scrubbed to ensure that they are real, important, and appropriately sized Address the needs through FY2007 as an initial step –As the gap between actual needs and available resources becomes clear, the committee should move to develop a suite of potential remedies. streamlining of operations and data analysis, sharpening the physics focus and ensuring the essential analyses are being addressed, merging certain support activities for D0 and CDF, increasing the use of post docs and visitors, and making special arrangements with CMS and ATLAS to smooth out the transition include an analysis and recommendations on what the agencies might do to ameliorate the problems associated with the transition.

8. f October20,22, 20058Collider International Finance Committees Collider Experiment Task Force Subgroup #1: Collaboration resources –Membership: Terry Wyatt and Rob Roser (co-chairs), Luciano Ristori, Pierre Petroff, Young- kee Kim, Gerry Blazey, and Chip Brock. Subgroup #2: Operations Requirements and resources –Membership: Willis Sakumoto and George Ginther (co-chairs), Linda Stutte, Mike Lindgren, Rob Roser, Gerry Blazey, Joel Butler, Jim Strait Subgroup #3: Data Processing requirements and resources – Membership: Ashutosh Kotwal and Gavin Davies (co-chairs), Amber Boehnlein, Rick Snider, Young-Kee Kim, Terry Wyatt, Bob Tschirhart, Vicky White Subgroup #4: Physics Analysis requirements and issues – –Membership: Gerry Blazey and Young-Kee Kim (co-chairs), John Hobbs, Volker Buesher, Franco Bedeschi, Rob Roser, and Beate Heinemann. Task Force has made considerable progress. –Draft Report Submitted to Director

9. f October20,22, 20059Collider International Finance Committees P5 Outcome? Anecdotal/Informal/Clandestine Readings only so far. P5 was impressed by: –Accelerator performance and prospects –Experiment performance and prospects –Experiment understanding of the issues –Expect to return to this issue in (early) 2007 Also heard that having heard from FNAL and SLAC, P5 needs to hear from the other side of the ledger

10. f October20,22, 200510Collider International Finance Committees Tevatron

11. f October20,22, 200511Collider International Finance Committees Tevatron

12. f October20,22, 200512Collider International Finance Committees Experiments CDF D0

13. f October20,22, 200513Collider International Finance Committees Schedule Recycler and electron cooling have been instrumental in the stores generated by stacking all the antiprotons in the recycler before shooting to the Tevatron. All the very highest Luminosity stores have been of this type. Issue for accelerator is to establish a higher antiproton production rate. This was the motivation for Director to delay shutdown to spring. –Ancillary concerns – feeder work in depths of cold Recent comedy with the Zebra Mussels now appears to prevent starting in February.

14. f October20,22, 200514Collider International Finance Committees MiniBooNE Beam Delivery

15. f October20,22, 200515Collider International Finance Committees NuMI/MINOS Beam Delivery Problem with Target worked around Recent problem with horn, fixed Hitting the 250 kwatt level Currently have > 6E19 protons on target 2005 Goal is 1E20 protons on target –They will be close

16. f October20,22, 200516Collider International Finance Committees Conclusions Past Year was very successful for the Collider experiments Neutrino Program is firing on all cylinders Future will continue to have challenges for management Future continues to hold great promise for collider physics. Advances in luminosity are driven by advances in the use of the Recycler and electron cooling. Fermilab continues to be committed to the Tevatron Collider program.