Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005

2 2 Contents Abstract Introduction Network Architectures Critical Design Factors Network Capacity Layered Communication  PHY  MAC  Routing  Transport  Cross Layer Design

3 3 Abstract Wireless mesh networks (WMNs)  A key technology for next-generation wireless networking Advantages over other wireless networks Rapid progress and inspiring numerous applications  Many technical issues exist

4 4 Introduction WMNs  Self-organize  Self-configure  Automatically establishing an ad hoc network  Maintaining the mesh connectivity WMNs are comprised of 2 types of nodes  Mesh routers  Mesh clients

5 5 Introduction Mesh router  Additional routing functions Support mesh networking  Lower transmission power Same coverage multi-hop communications  Same or different wireless access technologies Usually equipped with multiple wireless interfaces  Minimal mobility  Mesh backbone for mesh clients  Integration various other networks Gateway/bridge functionalities

6 6 Introduction Mesh client  Hardware platform & software simpler  light-weight Communication protocols  Only a single wireless interface is needed WMNs capabilities of ad-hoc networks  Low up-front cost  Easy network maintenance  Robustness  Reliable service coverage

7 7 Network Architecture 1. Infrastructure/Backbone WMNs

8 8 Network Architecture 1. Infrastructure/Backbone WMNs  Mesh routers for clients  Using various types of radio technologies  Connected to the Internet  Conventional clients with an Ethernet interface can be connected to mesh routers via Ethernet links  Same radio technologies (clients, routers) -> Directly communicate with mesh routers  Different radio technologies (clients, routers) -> Clients communicate with their BS

9 9 Network Architecture 2. Client WMNs  Peer-to-peer networks among client devices  Mesh router is not required  Using one type of radios on devices Same as a conventional ad hoc network

10 10 Network Architecture 3. Hybrid WMNs  Combination of infrastructure and client meshing  Clients can access the network through mesh routers

11 11 Network Architecture The characteristics of WMNs  Support ad hoc networking  Capability of self-forming, self-healing, self-organization  Multi-hop wireless networks  Decreases the load (mesh clients, other end nodes) Mesh routers have minimal mobility Dedicated routing and configuration  Mobility of end nodes is supported  Mesh routers integrate heterogeneous networks  Different Power-consumption constraints mesh routers, clients  Need compatibility, interoperability

12 12 Critical Design Factors 1. Radio Techniques.  Increase capacity, flexibility approaches Directional & smart antennas Multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems Multi-radio/multi-channel systems  Advanced radio technologies Reconfigurable radios Frequency agile/cognitive radios Software radios Need design with higher-layer protocols  MAC and routing protocol

13 13 Critical Design Factors 2. Scalability  Without support Scalability Network performance degrades as the network size increases. Example  Routing protocols  can’t find a reliable routing path  Transport protocols  loose connections  MAC protocols  significant throughput reduction  Ensure the scalability  All protocols need to be scalable

14 14 Critical Design Factors 3. Mesh Connectivity  Many advantages of WMNs  Ensure reliable mesh connectivity Require Network self-organization & topology control algorithms  Topology-aware MAC & routing protocols Improve performance 4. Broadband and QoS  Applications Broadband services & Heterogeneous QoS requirements  Protocol consider End-to-end transmission delay, fairness, delay jitter, aggregate and per-node through-put, and packet loss ratios

15 15 Critical Design Factors 5. Security  Security schemes are still not fully applicable 6. Ease of Use  Enable the network to be as autonomous as possible Consider Protocols designed  Require network management tools Maintain the operation, monitor the performance, configure the parameters 7. Compatibility & Inter-operability  Require backward compatible

16 16 Network Capacity Researchs  Using the similarities between WMNs and ad hoc networks  Limitation Do not consider different medium access control, power control, routing protocols New analytical results need!

17 Layered Communication Protocol for WMNs 17

18 18 Layered Communication Protocols - Physical Layer Advanced Physical-Layer Techniques  Multiple transmission rates Different modulation & Coding rates Combination  Link adaptation  Adaptive error resilience  high-speed transmissions OFDM UWB techniques  Increase capacity & mitigate the impairment Antenna diversity Smart antenna MIMO systems

19 19 Layered Communication Protocols - Physical Layer  Software radio platform Programmable Channel access modes, Channel modulations Not a mature technology yet Open Research Issues.  Complexity of OFDM, UWB and cost  Best utilize Higher-layer protocols, MAC protocols need to work interactively with the physical layer

20 20 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer MAC Differences (WMNs, classical wireless networks)  Concerned with more than one-hop communication  Distributed MAC  Needs to be collaborative  Works for multipoint-to-multipoint communication  Network self-organization is needed for better collaboration  Low Mobility

21 21 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Single-channel MAC  Modifying Existing MAC Protocols Adjusting parameters of CSMA/CA Cannot reduce the probability of contentions  Cross-layer Design Directional antenna-based MACs  Eliminates exposed nodes  Directional transmission -> More hidden nodes produce  Difficulties -> Cost, system complexity, practicality of fast steerable directional antennas

22 22 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer MACs with power control.  Reduces exposed nodes, especially in a dense network  Low transmission power  Improve the spectrum spatial reuse factor  Lower transmission power  Reduce the possibility of detecting a potential interfering node  Hidden nodes issue become worse  Proposing Innovative MAC Protocols. Poor scalability in a multi-hop network  CSMA/CA are not an efficient solution  Revisiting the design of MAC protocols based on TDMA or CDMA is indispensable Problems  Complexity & Cost  Compatibility of TDMA (or CDMA) MAC with existing MAC protocols.

23 23 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Multi-Channel MAC.  Multi-Channel Single-Transceiver MAC Low cost & compatibility  One transceiver on a radio Only one transceiver is available  Only one channel is active at a time in each network node  Multi-Channel Multi-Transceiver MAC Multiple parallel RF front-end chips & baseband processing modules  Support several simultaneous channels

24 24 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Open Research Issues  Scalable MAC  MAC/Physical Cross-Layer Design  Network Integration in the MAC Layer

25 25 Layered Communication Protocols - Routing Layer Optimal routing protocol for WMNs  Multiple Performance Metrics Minimum hop-count  ineffective  Scalability Setting up or maintaining a routing path take a long time  Critical to scalability routing protocol  Robustness Robust to link failures or congestion Perform load balancing  Efficient Routing with Mesh Infrastructure Minimal mobility and no power consumption constraints  Simpler routing protocols

26 26 Layered Communication Protocols - Routing Layer Open Research Issues  Scalability  Better Performance Metrics New performance metrics need to be developed  Routing/MAC Cross-Layer Design Interact with the MAC layer in order to improve performance  Efficient Mesh Routing Much simpler and more efficient routing protocol need

27 27 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer Reliable Data Transport  TCP variants Non-Congestion Packet Loss  Classical TCPs do not differentiate congestion & non-congestion losses Unknown Link Failure  Wireless channels & mobility  link failure happen  To enhance TCP performance, link failure needs to be detected Network Asymmetry Large RTT Variations  Mobility  Large RTT variations  Degrade the TCP performance

28 28 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer  New transport protocols Better performance than the TCP variants Integrated many other wireless networks  transport protocols need to be compatible with TCPs  New transport protocols is not compatible Real-Time Delivery  Require Rate control protocol (RCP) To support end-to-end delivery of realtime traffic Work with UDP  No schemes are available

29 29 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer Open Research Issues  Reliable Data Transport Cross-layer Solution to Network Asymmetry  All problems of TCP performance degradation are actually related to protocols in the lower layers Adaptive TCP  Integrating various wireless network  compatible is important  adaptive TCP  Real-time transport Entirely new RCPs need

30 30 Layered Communication Protocols - Cross Layer Design Approachs  1.Taking into account parameters in other protocol layers keeps the transparency between protocol layers  2.To merge several protocols into one component achieve much better performance through closer interaction between protocols Cross-layer designs risks  Protocol-layer abstraction loss  Incompatibility with existing protocols  Unforeseen impact on the future design  Difficulty in maintenance and management


Download ppt "A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google