Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Yen-Yu Chang, Li-Chung Ha, Yen-Mu Chen Chih-Hao Pai Investigator Jypyng Wang, Szu-yuan Chen, Jiunn-Yuan Lin Contributing Students Institute of Atomic and.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Yen-Yu Chang, Li-Chung Ha, Yen-Mu Chen Chih-Hao Pai Investigator Jypyng Wang, Szu-yuan Chen, Jiunn-Yuan Lin Contributing Students Institute of Atomic and."— Presentation transcript:

1 Yen-Yu Chang, Li-Chung Ha, Yen-Mu Chen Chih-Hao Pai Investigator Jypyng Wang, Szu-yuan Chen, Jiunn-Yuan Lin Contributing Students Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan Production of intense ultrashort mid-IR pulses from a laser-wakefield electron accelerator

2 Methods for the generation of sub-ps mid-IR pulses Laser-wakefield electron accelerator operated in the bubble regime Experimental setup and tomographic measurement Generation of intense ultrashort mid-infrared pulses in the bubble regime Outline

3 : frequency : wavelength mid-IR: 5 – 40  m; far-IR: (25-40) – (200-350)  m Terahertz wave( 兆赫波 ): 0.1 – 10 THz (THz = 10 12 Hz) Spectrum of electromagnetic wave

4 Generation of sub-ps MIR pulses Free-electron lasers: facilitytunable spectral range pulse durationenergy/pulse Jefferson Lab (USA) 1 - 14 mm0.2 - 2 ps100 - 300  J Frequency conversion in nonlinear crystals or gas media: methodwavelength rangepulse durationenergy/pulse 4-wave mixing in air [1] 2.5 mm - 5.5 mm (bandwidth) ~13 fs ~1.5  J DFG in AgGaS 2 crystal [2] 6 mm - 12 mm (tunable range) < 1 ps ~4.5  J [1] Fuji et al., Opt. Lett. 32, 3330 (2007) [2] Imahoko et al., Appl. Phys. B 87, 629 (2007) This work: methodwavelength rangepulse durationenergy/pulse spectral broadening in the bubble regime 2 mm - 12 mm (bandwidth) < 600 fs >3 mJ

5 Laser-wakefield electron accelerator operated in the bubble regime Pukov et al., Appl. Phys. B 74, 355 (2002)

6 Laser-wakefield electron accelerator operated in the bubble regime Pukov et al., Appl. Phys. B 74, 355 (2002) energy: 50 MeV±10 %, divergene: 4 mrad duration: ~10 fs (PIC simualtion) Phys. Rev. E 75, 036402 (2007) monoenergetic electron beam 200 mJ, 42 fs 4x10 19 cm -3 plasma density

7 Laser-wakefield electron accelerator operated in the bubble regime spectral broadening Faure et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 205003 (2005)

8 SLM: spatial light modulator OAP: off-axis parabolic mirror Diagnostic tools (a)LANEX imaging system for electron beam (b)Interferometry for plasma density measurement Experimental setup for production of electron beam

9 SLM: spatial light modulator OAP: off-axis parabolic mirror Diagnostic tools (a)LANEX imaging system for electron beam (replaced by (c)) (b)Interferometry for plasma density measurement (c) MIR grating spectrometer Diagnoses for MIR pulse (1): spectrometer

10 SLM: spatial light modulator OAP: off-axis parabolic mirror Diagnostic tools (a)LANEX imaging system for electron beam (replaced by (d)) (b)Interferometry for plasma density measurement (c) MIR grating spectrometer (d)Pyroelectric detector Diagnoses for MIR pulse (2): energy & beam profile

11 SLM: spatial light modulator OAP: off-axis parabolic mirror Diagnostic tools (a)LANEX imaging system for electron beam (replaced by (e)) (b)Interferometry for plasma density measurement (c) MIR grating spectrometer (d)Pyroelectric detector (e)Ge-wafer photo-switch Diagnoses for MIR pulse (3): temporal profile

12 1. The machining beam ionizes and heats up selected regions. 2. Plasma heating leads to hydrodynamic expansion. 3. Several nanoseconds later the ionized region is evacuated. 4. Characteristics of final products as functions of pump-pulse positions in the gas jet can be measured. Scanning the interaction length for tomographic measurement intensity of the machining pulse Phys. Plasmas 12, 070707 (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 095001 (2006)

13 Setup of the machining beam for tomographic measurement focal spot: 20  m  1.3 mm function of the knife-edge: setting the interaction length machining pulse variable position knife-edge or SLM pump pulse gas jet cylindrical lens pair

14 Self-injection of the monoenergetic electron beam and rapid growth of the MIR pulse occurs in the same region. Dependence of MIR energy on interaction length pump pulse energy: 205 mJ pump pulse duration: 42 fs plasma density: 4.1x10 19 cm -3 self-injection regions of electrons

15 The spectral profile of the MIR pulse suggests that the MIR pulse is produced by the strong spectral broadening of the pump pulse in the bubble regime. Dependence of MIR spectra on interaction length pump pulse energy: 205 mJ pump pulse duration: 42 fs plasma density: 4.1x10 19 cm -3 position (mm)spectra 1.5  1.6a peak at 7.9  m and then broadened > 1.85 a continuous distribution extending from the short wavelength side 0

16 Dependence of MIR spectra on interaction length The spectral profile of the MIR pulse suggests that the MIR pulse is produced by the strong spectral broadening of the pump pulse in the bubble regime. The Raman satellite is related to the modulational instability of the pump pulse in the early stage of the bubble regime evolution. 0

17 The MIR pulse is linearly polarized with the same polarization as the pump pulse. This is consistent with the bubble-regime model since the spectral broadening by phase modulation should preserve the pump laser polarization. Polarization of the MIR pulse polarization axis of the pump pulse (1)coherent transition radiation from the electron bunch passing the plasma-vacuum boundary (2) Cherenkov-type emission from the electron bunch or the plasma wave Both are radially polarized. The data rule out the possibility of other mechanisms Ref: Leemans et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 074802 (2003)

18 The MIR pulse is a flattop distribution with its diameter determined by the clear aperture of the ZnSe vacuum window. The angular divergence of the MIR pulse is larger than the collection angle (8°) and the total MIR pulse energy should be considerably larger than 3 mJ. MIR pulse energy vs. iris radius pump pulse energy: 205 mJ pump pulse duration: 42 fs plasma density: 4.1x10 19 cm -3 radius of the ZnSe vacuum window

19 Ge-wafer photo-switch MIR pulse excitation pulse pinhole

20 Ge-wafer photo-switch MIR pulse excitation pulse pinhole

21 Ge-wafer photo-switch MIR pulse excitation pulse pinhole

22 Temporal profile of the MIR pulse Ge-wafer photo-switch pump pulse: 205 mJ/42 fs excitation pulse: 500  J/38 fs plasma density: 4.1x10 19 cm -3 temporal profile pulse duration X ps 4.6 ps 9.8 ps 5-mm Ge window X < 0.6 ps

23 3-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation Code: VORPAL Laser pulse: energy: 205 mJ central wavelength: 810 nm pulse length: 42 fs beam size: 8  m in FWHM peak laser intensity: 6×10 18 W/cm2 linearly polarized in z direction 0 x moving window light speed L ramp z Uniform plasma density: 4.1×10 19 cm -3 L ramp = 500  m, flattop=1.6 mm flattop S ize of window: L x =64  m L y = L z = 100  m S ize of gird: 2560 cells in X 250 ×250 cells in Y and Z 4 particles per cell

24  The pump pulse undergoes phase modulation imposed by the plasma wave and relativistic self- phase modulation. As a result, the laser spectrum broadens.  The laser pulse with its pulse duration longer than the plasma period breaks up into a pulse train.  As a result of spectrum broadening, the laser pulse in the bubble undergoes longitudinal self- compression.  As the laser intensity gets higher and higher, a plasma bubble is formed. When the plasma bubble evolves into a certain shape and amplitude, a monoenergetic electron beam can be generated.  Since most of the photons in the laser pulse stay in the descending slope of the plasma bubble, the spectrum of the laser pulse is mainly broadened toward the long wavelength side. Simulation-evolution of plasma wave and laser pulse intensity profile of the laser pulse

25 Simulation-MIR spectrum and temporal profile The duration of the MIR pulse is about 20 fs from the simulation, which indicates that the laser peak power may reach 0.4 TW. The maximum MIR pulse energy is 7 mJ. The spectrum shows a continuous distribution extended from the shorter wavelength side and the trend agrees well with the experimental data. intensity profile of the MIR pulse covering 2 - 20  m The MIR pulse is trapped by the plasma bubble, which enables the MIR pulse to propagate through the plasma. MIR pulse covering 6 - 10  m

26 Experimental data suggest that the MIR pulse is produced by the strong spectral broadening of the pump pulse in a laser- wakefield electron accelerator operated in the bubble regime. Production of an intense MIR pulse with at least 3-mJ pulse energy and ultrashort pulse duration from a laser-wakefield electron accelerator is demonstrated. The output energy is one order of magnitude larger than that of the most intense free electron lasers, and three order of magnitude larger than that of conventional wave mixing. Summary

27 Thanks for your attention.

28 The MIR pulse energy increases with plasma density faster than the emergence of the monoenergetic electron beam. This is consistent with the bubble-regime model as the strong spectral broadening and self- compression is the cause of bubble formation. Dependence of MIR energy on plasma density pump pulse energy: 205 mJ pump pulse duration: 42 fs

29 The MIR pulse has a lower pump energy threshold than that of the monoenergetic electron beam. This is consistent with the bubble-regime model as the strong spectral broadening and self-compression is the cause of bubble formation. plasma density: 4.1x10 19 cm -3 Dependence of MIR energy on pump energy

30 Simulation-monoenergetic electron beam The duration of the MIR pulse is about 20 fs from the simulation, which indicates that the laser peak power may reach 0.4 TW. The maximum MIR pulse energy is 7 mJ. The spectrum shows a continuous distribution extended from the shorter wavelength side and the trend agrees well with the experimental data. intensity profile of the MIR pulse covering 2 - 20  m The MIR pulse is trapped by the plasma bubble, which enables the MIR pulse to propagate through the plasma.

31 Picture of experimental chamber

32 machining beam main beam (1) MIR (2) electron beam


Download ppt "Yen-Yu Chang, Li-Chung Ha, Yen-Mu Chen Chih-Hao Pai Investigator Jypyng Wang, Szu-yuan Chen, Jiunn-Yuan Lin Contributing Students Institute of Atomic and."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google