Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGeraldine O’Brien’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
Real time Arctic SST retrieval from satellite IR data issues and solutions(?) Pierre Le Borgne, Gérard Legendre, Anne Marsouin, Sonia Péré, Hervé Roquet Centre de Météorologie Spatiale, Météo-France, Lannion, France
2
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Outline METOP-A/AVHRR derived daytime SST in September 2013 -Data -METOP-A (daytime) -Atmospheric profile data set -Validation results (5years) -Regional algorithms -Use of NWP outputs -Conclusions
3
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Data : METOP-A SST METOP-A:1km resolution SST, Global coverage since 2007 METOP SST (see http://www.osi-saf.org )http://www.osi-saf.org –Cloud mask (Maia, L. Lavanant, MF/CMS) –Ice mask (Ice probability, S. Eastwood, met.no) –Cloud/ice control –Daytime algorithm SST = a T 11 + (b T CLI + c S ) (T 11 - T 12 ) + d S + e MDB: 5 year Matchups at full resolution; buoy location in central pixel within 3 hrs
4
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter DATA: ECMWF output derived BT simulations (CEP+) ECMWF operational forecasts RTTOV version 10.2 applied onto each profiles BTs at 3.7, 10.8 and 12 m Training dataset 60N
5
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Daytime « Arctic » validation results Error vs clear sky coverage: Clouds induce negative errors (no evidence of ice related errors) Error vs T11-T12 5 year MDB All cov n QL 3-5 174050.050.66 Simulated Error vs T11-T12 Simul. CEP+ n 5340.220.34
6
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Validation conclusions Significant influence of cloud contamination –Improved cloud/ice detection effort: met.no Errors determined by the shape of atmospheric profiles: (ex: summer temperature inversion cases lead to large positive errors) Errors well reproduced by simulations
7
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Solutions 1)Multisensor Bias corrections (Hoyer et al, 2013, RSE, in press) AATSR and NAVOCEANO GAC data as reference 2) Regional algorithms NLC SST = (a + b S ) T 11 + (c + d T CLI + e S ) (T 11 - T 12 ) + f +g S CASSTA SST = (a + b S ) T 11 +c +d S 3) NWP derived correction methods
8
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Regional algorithms ? 5 Year MDB +Cloud filtering reinforced: cov> 0.8; QL 4-5 Three regimes?
9
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Regional algorithms Regional algorithms applied on the 5 year MDB 6143 cases (cov>0.8) QL 4-5 Operational NLC Simulation derived regional NLC Optimal regional NLC Optimal CASSTA (T10.8) 0.280.250. 0.450.500.440.64 Simulation dataset (CEP+) not adequate to determine regional algorithms T10.8 based algo Not convincing
10
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter NLC vs CASSTA on MDB T108- T120 max 0.0.10.20.5 Optimal NLC 0.760.730.750.59 Optimal CASSTA 0.770.740.780.68 Residual standard deviation on MDB
11
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter NWP derived methods Simulations must be « exact »: they should produce the same BTs as would be observed, given a surface temperature and atmospheric profiles: A BT simulation adjustment step is necessary We need to compare observations and simulations (in consistent conditions)
12
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Simulations too cold
13
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Low wind zones: DW!
14
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter OSTIA and DW in the Arctic? Filter: 7 ms-1? June 2012June 2013June 2011
15
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Relative number of clear sky cases with wind > 7ms-1 July 2012
16
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Daytime prototype results in 2012 summer Arctic June July August 2012, lat > 60°N 1070 casesOperational NLC Operational NLC + bias correction Optimal HL NLC OSTIA d-0.10-0.13-0.12-0.31 s0.600.550.520.37
17
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Trends with latitude Operational NLC + bias correction Optimal HL NLCOSTIA
18
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Operational SST retrieval methods in Arctic Global daytime algorithm leads to SST overestimations by several tenths of K for T108-T120 below 0.5K Regional algorithms may solve the problem, however simulation derived algorithms necessitate dedicated profile data sets DW induced differences between OSTIA and observed SST make NWP derived simulation adjustments quite difficult in permanent daylight conditions Drastic wind filtering (> 10ms-1) has lead to satisfactory results.
19
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Further work CMS to write a paper on 5 (7) years of METOP-A Arctic results X(?) to build up a profile database adapted to Arctic studies CMS to prepare regional HL algorithms as a backup to simulation derived BTs for METOP-B CMS & DMI to compare METOP biases (NWP derived vs Jacob’s method) …….
20
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter 10.8 micron simulation error on the 1st of June 2012
21
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Summertime error origin (see also LeBorgne et al, EUMETSAT Oslo 2011) 0.5<T11-T12 <0.7 Air temp. dt/dq 0.5<T11-T12 <0.7 Normal case =0.04, =0.16 0.<T11-T12 <0.3 Air temp. dt/dq 0.<T11-T12 <0.3 Summer Arctic Case =0.55, =0.21
22
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter Trends with T108-T120 Operational NLC + bias correction Optimal HL NLC
23
Earthtemp Arctic SST workshop 18-19 December, Exeter
24
Anomalies in Sept 2013 METOP-A/AVHRR derived daytime SST in September 2013
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.