Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCori Riley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Gonneke W.J.M.Stevens; Wilma A.M.Vollebergh; Trees V.M.Pels Sco Psychiatry Psychiar Epidemiol(2005) 40: 571-579 Impact factor: 2.052 Date:99/10/14
2
Introduction ◦ Externalizing ◦ Internalizing Methods Result Discussion Conclusion
3
This aim of the current study is to contribute to the knowledge in this field ◦ Externalizing problems ◦ Internalizing problems
4
Child factor ◦ Internalizing According to Zahn-Waxler et al., the strongest risk factor for emotional Problems is gender: Female adolescents were found to be at least twice as likely as males to become anxious and depressed, a pattern that continues throughout adulthood ◦ Externalizing Associations between child variables and externalizing behavior are well established in literature
5
Family factor ◦ Internalizing Several processes in, and characteristics of, the family influence the development of emotional problems in adolescents ◦ Externalizing Parental behavior in interaction with the child is the family factor most proximal to the child’s everyday experience
6
School/peer factor ◦ Internalizing Although parents still occupy a central position in the lives of their children, relations with peers become increasingly important during adolescence ◦ Externalizing The child’s progress into adolescence is marked by increased involvement with peers. In this period, parental influence diminishes whereas peer influence increases
7
Migration factor ◦ Internalizing Moroccan adolescents may be faced with risk factors related to their (or their parents‘) migration ◦ Externalizing Variables specific for migration, like country of birth and fluency in the language used in the current country may influence the level of externalizing problems in Moroccan immigrant adolescents
8
Three goals- Externalizing ◦ First: Gain insight into the predictors of externalizing problems in Moroccan immigrant adolescents living in the Netherlands in the age range of 11-18 years ◦ Second: The gender specificity of the associations is examined ◦ Third: Want to find out which factor is most strongly associated with externalizing problems in Moroccan immigrant adolescents
9
Three goals-Internalizing ◦ First: Gain insight into the predictors of internalizing problems in Moroccan immigrant adolescents living in the Netherlands in the Netherlands ◦ Second: Examine the gender specificity of the associations ◦ Third: Examine the contribution of child, proximal family, parent, contextual family, global family, school/peer, and migration factors to the prediction of emotional problems with and without controlling for the other predictor sets
10
Sample Population Aged 4 through 8 At least one parent born in Morocco of two of the four largest cities in Netherlands N=1260 N=1127 For 73% N=819 Parent report N=415 teacher report N=296 Adolescents report Aged 11 through 18 N=376 Response rate 82% N=238 excluded 7 April 2000 to July 2002 Permission for parents and adolescents Only one child per family Excluded 96 Mentally retarded Lived in Moroccan Excluded 37
11
Sample
12
Instruments ◦ Internalizing and externalizing behavior Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Youth Self-Report (YSR) Teacher’s Report Form (TRF) Internalizing Sum of scores on items in the Withdraws, Somatic Complaints, and Anxious/Depressed syndrome profiles Externalizing Sum of scores on the Delinquent and Aggressive behavior syndromes
13
Instruments ◦ Child factor Gender Age Internalizing Chronic health problems of the child were obtained from the parent Methods
14
Instruments ◦ Proximal family factor Affection 0=highly disagree to 5=highly agree Monitoring 0=nothing to 3=everything Support from father (α=0.86) Support from mother (α=0.78) Parent-child conflict (parent report α=0.90) Parent-child conflict (adolescent report α=0.85) 0=never to 4=very often Methods
15
Instruments ◦ Parent factor Somatic symptoms Anxiety/Insomnia (α=0.90) Social Dysfunction (α=0.77) Severe Depression Methods
16
Instruments ◦ Contextual family factor Conflicts parents about parenting Conflicts parents about other things 0=never to 2=often Positive communication parents Destructive communication parents Total number of life-events Methods
17
Instruments ◦ Global family factor Marital status 0=married 1=not married Family education level 0=no education at all to 4=high level of vocational training or university Family employment level 0=no job to 3=high job level Number of children in the family Methods
18
Instruments ◦ School/peer factor Problems at school Being bored 0=never to 4=each day Support from friends (α=0.86) Deviant peers 0=no; 1=yes (α=0.86) Hanging out 0=never to 4=each day Methods
19
Instruments ◦ Migration factor Country of birth adolescent Muslim identification adolescent (α=0.76) Perceived group discrimination adolescent Muslim identification parent (α=0.59) Perceived group discrimination parent Fluency in Dutch parent (understanding) Fluency in Dutch parent (speaking) 0=not all to 3=very well Methods
20
Statistical analysis ◦ Cross-sectional study ◦ Univariate analysis ◦ Linear regression analysis ◦ Cronbach's alpha
21
Externalizing problems
22
Internalizing problems
23
Externalizing problems Result
24
Internalizing problems
26
internalizingExternalizing Gender externalizingInternalizing Parent-child conflict (parent report) Affection Conflicts parents about parentingMonitoring Perceived group discrimination adolescent Support from father Support from mother Parent-child conflict (parent report) Problems at school Deviant peers Hanging out
27
Study limitations ◦ Unable to examine the causal directions of the associations ◦ Unable to test whether the associations about externalizing or internalizing problems between Moroccan immigrant and Western populations ◦ Not all important predictors have been taken into account temperament for externalizing and internalizing
28
Study limitations ◦ Sample might not be representative for the entire Moroccan immigrant population in Netherlands Almost 50% of the Moroccans ◦ Unable generalized to other migrant populations, as differences between migrant populations are numerous
29
Study suggest that the child, school/peer, and proximal family factors are essential in models predicting the development of externalizing and internalizing problems turned out to be relatively small
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.