Download presentation
Published byCorey McDonald Modified over 9 years ago
1
TRELLISING OF GRAPEVINES INCREASING YIELD AND QUALITY
Andrew Teubes Viticultural Consultant
2
In this presentation Different types of trellising systems used in the world Factors influencing long term grape fruitfulness Reasons for trellising or non-trellised cultivation Advantages of trellising Comparison between yields of different trellis systems
3
Grape fruitfulness Fruitfulness=potential of vine to yield fruit
Two main factors Sunlight on leaves of basal buds during spring period, especially during flowering and fruit set Temperature during flowering and fruit set Any trellis system that will increase the sunlight exposure of the leaves will result in increased fruitfulness
4
Types of trellis systems
Bush vines (traditional) – no trellis Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP) – I-trellis Semi-horizontal Shoot Positioning Y-trellis Double Gable Trentina (Factory roof) Horizontal shoot positioning T-trellis Pergola (Spanish Paron, Roof system) Unconventional systems
5
Mazar Traditional bush vine Afghanistan Shomali
6
Traditional bush vine Egypt (Nile delta)
7
Traditional bush vine Spain South Africa
8
Traditional bush vine Uzbekistan
9
Why bush vine and not trellis?
Reasons for bush vine cultivation Soil potential medium, therefore do not expect high vigour in plants (shoot growth stops naturally at cm) No irrigation or Low availability of irrigation water Bush vines naturally yield smaller crops than trellised vineyards No capital available for installation of trellising materials (poles, wires, anchors)
10
Advantages of bush vines
Low cost No expensive capital investment required
11
Disadvantages of bush vines
Low yield potential Not suitable for cane pruning (increased bud load) No support for shoots under high vigour situations Disease control not effective Poor penetration of sprays into canopy Weed control very difficult (only by hand) Grape clusters have lower quality Temperature of clusters higher close to soil surface Physical damage to clusters close to soil More dust on clusters All labour activities problematic Pruning, shoot removal, leaf removal, harvesting
12
Dust Grape clusters very close to soil Sun exposure – sun burn
13
Advantages of trellising
Vine has natural climbing growth habit; trellis provides larger surface area for growth and fruiting Increase yield potential Allows differential pruning techniques (spurs and canes) Increase quality of fruit Above soil surface, no dust or physical damage Better micro climate around clusters Easy management and mechanization Weed control Disease- and pest control Labour
14
Management advantages
Clusters have protection -sun -dust -physical damage Comfortable height for working and picking grapes Easy control of weeds
15
Vertical Shoot Positioning (I-trellis)
South Africa Chile
16
Semi Horizontal (Y-trellis)
Turkey Mexico
17
Semi Horizontal (Double Gable)
South Africa
18
Semi Horizontal (Trentina)
South Africa
19
Horizontal (T-trellis)
South Africa Saudi Arabia
20
Pergola (Roof trellis)
Chile South Africa
21
Unconventional systems
When are they used? When trellis materials are not available or too expensive (poles, wires) When climatic factors limit the use of conventional systems Continental climates with extreme winter chilling Vines must be covered with soil in winter to protect from freezing Parts of Northern China, old USSR, Afghanistan, Korea
22
Egypt Reeds from Nile River is used as trellising material
23
Afghanistan (Samangan region)
24
China Deep ditch plantation to resist winter freeze of roots
Close vine spacing to increase vines per hectare Deep ditch plantation to resist winter freeze of roots
25
Uzbekistan
26
Comparison of performance of trellising systems (Chenin blanc/R99, 1980)
Treatment Bush vines Single wire Two Three Four Wire Five 1.5 m Slanting (5 wire) Plant spacing 2.6 x 1.3 1.3 x 1.3 2.75 x Plants/ha 2 959 5 917 2 797 Material costs (Rand/ha) - 480 750 5.4 t 900 1430 1720 12.3 t 2400 Yield (ton/ha) 12.5 0% 22.9 26.1 27.5 220% 30.3 32.7 33.6 270% 42.6 Yield (kg/plant) 4.2 3.9 8.8 9.3 10.2 11.1 11.4 14.4 Income R140/t) 1750 3206 3654 3850 4242 4578 4704 5964
27
4.2 kg per vine Bush vines pruned with short spurs
28
Single wire system Post Wire 70 cm Soil surface
29
. Single wire trellis 8.8 kg per vine Shoot growth Wire position
Soil surface 8.8 kg per vine Single wire trellis
30
Wire 2 30 cm Wire 1 70 cm Soil surface Two (2) wire system
31
. Soil surface 9.3 kg per vine Two wire trellis
32
Three (3) wire system Wire 3 Parallel Wire 2 30 cm Wire 1 70 cm
Soil surface Three (3) wire system
33
. . . Three wire trellis 10.2 kg per vine Position of parallel wires
Soil surface Three wire trellis
34
Four (4) wire system Wire 4 30 cm Wire 3 Parallel Wire 2 30 cm Wire 1
Soil surface Four (4) wire system
35
. . . . . 11.1 kg per vine Soil surface Four wire trellis
36
Five (5) wire system Wire 5 Parallel Wire 4 30 cm Wire 3 Parallel
Soil surface Five (5) wire system
37
. . . 11.4 kg per vine . . . Soil surface Five wire trellis
38
Single slanting trellis
Wires Single slanting trellis 5 wires 140 cm Soil surface
39
Single slanting trellis
. . . . . 14.4 kg per vine Soil surface
40
Summary Trellis systems will always increase yield potential, because
Creates larger area for vine to grow Allows better sunlight penetration into canopy, increasing fruitfulness Long term high yield will only be sustainable together with Correct pruning practices Effective summer shoot management (shoot thinning, shoot positioning, leaf thinning) Regular maintenance of trellis sytem
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.