1. CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 25, 2001

2. WRAP-UP OF LAST CLASS We learned about the rules for relation back under FRCP 15 (c ) Relation back rules apply only where the SOL has run Before there can be relation back, amendment must be permitted (15(a), (b))

3. WHAT WILL WE DO TODAY? Do a couple of hypos on relation back Argue Practice Exercise 10 Discuss when an attorney, firm or party may be subject to sanctions under FRCP 11 Discuss, if time permits, Practice Exercise 11 NOTE: I will not discuss P.E. 9, because I handed out a model answer. If you have questions on P.E. 9, please let me know.

4. HYPO ON RELATION BACK Jim, a pedestrian, brings a claim in negligence against Barry, the driver of a car that struck him. Jim moves to amend to add a claim that Barry negligently failed to stop and render appropriate aid at the scene of the accident. If granted, will this amendment relate back under Rule 15 (c )? Why or why not?

5. ANOTHER HYPO Erik is angry about a statement made by Professor Fischer in a class hypothetical on 8/27/00 He files a libel action in federal court for the District of Maryland on 9/12/00 naming “Marianne” Fischer as D in his complaint. Erik serves the complaint by personal service on Professor Fischer at the law school on 9/15/00. Assume the statute of limitations is 1 year. Erik learns that Professor Fischer’s first name is not “Marianne” but “Susanna”. On 9/18/01 Erik moves to amend his complaint to change the defendant’s name to “Susanna”. Will the amendment relate back?

6. SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS When and why would a court permit service of a “supplemental” pleading? What rule governs supplemental pleadings? MUST a party serve a supplemental pleading?

7. TIME LIMITS FOR RESPONDING TO AMENDED PLEADINGS How long does a party have to respond to an amended pleading? What is the governing FRCP?

8. PRACTICE EXERCISE 10 Argument on motion to amend in Carpenter Plaintiff’s counsel (A-H) Defendants’ counsel (I, J) Counsel for Ultimate Auto (K-P) Counsel for City of Lowell (Q-V) Clerks to the presiding judge (W-Z)

9. PRACTICE EXERCISE 10 Tips on Arguing Motions Make argument quickly, assuming judge doesn’t know much about facts/law State who you are and who you represent Tell judge what must be decided Give sufficient information about facts, or cases or rules on which you rely Answer judge’s questions when she asks them Meet your opponent’s arguments

10. Rule 11 of the FRCP Attorneys and parties are subject to certain PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS when filing PLEADINGS, MOTIONS and other LITIGATION DOCUMENTS as well as “LATER ADVOCATING” allegations in these documents in ORAL ARGUMENT Does not apply to DISCOVERY (11(d)) Failure to comply with Rule 11 MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS against attorney, firm, party

11. MAJOR REVISIONS TO RULE 11 1983 (very stringent: mandatory sanctions requiring lawyers to conduct adequate factual and legal investigation before bringing civil lawsuits) 1993 (eased this stringency)

12. PURPOSE OF RULE 11 What is the purpose of Rule 11?

13. PURPOSE OF RULE 11 What is the purpose of Rule 11? To deter frivolous lawsuits and abusive litigation practices by ensuring that lawyers conduct adequate factual and legal investigations prior to commencing suit

14. STRUCTURE OF RULE 11 11(a) Signature requirements 11(b) Representations made by filing or submitting pleadings, motions or court papers 11© Sanctions for violating 11(b) 11(d) inapplicability of 11(a)-© to discovery

15. SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS What signature requirements are laid down by Rule 11? What provision of Rule 11 provides for these signature requirements?

16. FRCP 11 SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS FRCP 11(a) Pleadings, written motions and “other papers” filed or served in litigation must be SIGNED by at least one attorney of record or by unrepresented parties Also should have signers address/phone no. Earlier verification requirement abolished in absence of rule or statute

17. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FRCP 11(a) What is the effect of failure to comply with the signature requirements of Rule 11(a)?

18. STANDARDS PLEADINGS MUST MEET: RULE 11(b) What does signing or filing a document with the court or later arguing on behalf of that document CERTIFY?

19. FRCP 11(b) certifications FRCP 11(b)(1): [the document] is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.

20. FRCP 11(b) certifications FRCP 11(b)(2): the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law.

21. FRCP 11(b) certifications FRCP 11(b)(3): the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery What if only part of the document violates the Rule?

22. FRCP 11(b) certifications FRCP 11(b)(4): the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonable based on a lack of information or belief.

23. Scope of 11(b) requirements Does 11(b) requirements relate to a signed intent to sue letter? See also 11(d) – 11(a)-© don’t apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions under Rules 26-37. There are separate sanctions for discovery abuses in these rules.

24. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH 11(b) What happens if a party or attorney violates any of the certification requirements in 11(b)?

25. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH FRCP 11(b FRCP Rule 11(c ) Attorney, law firm and/or party may be SANCTIONED! Sanctions are discretionary 11 (c ) does NOT apply to violations of FRCP 11(a) A party can move for sanctions. Can a party move for sanctions against her own attorney? Can the court sanction sua sponte?

26. RULES FOR SANCTIONS MOTIONS You can’t make a sanctions motion with other motions 11©(1)(a) Sanctions motions must allege with specificity the alleged violations of Rule 11(b) Winning party may be awarded costs of sanctions motion 11©(1)(a) SAFE HARBOR RULE

27. What is the “safe harbor” under FRCP 11( c) and how does it work? Why do you think the safe harbor rule was introduced? Do you think it is a good change?

28. COURT-INITIATED SANCTIONS If the court believes that Rule 11(b) has been violated, what is the procedure? Does the safe harbor apply to court-initiated sanctions? PLEASE NOTE: court-initiated sanctions are relatively rare and reserved only for grievously offending conduct similar to contempt of court

29. POLICY OF DETERRENCE Please explain the policy of deterrence limiting a sanctions award under FRCP 11 and state what subsection of FRCP 11 contains this policy. What types of sanctions may be awarded under Rule 11©?

30. TYPES OF RULE 11 SANCTIONS MONETARY: payment of penalty into court, payment to moving party of reasonable attorneys’ fees or costs, but NOT punitive damages Must make motion for attorneys fees or costs NONMONETARY: reprimands, dismissals, findings, strikiing paper What limits exist on monetary sanctions under Rule 11©?

31. LIMITS ON MONETARY SANCTIONS 1. When are monetary sanctions unavailable against a REPRESENTED PARTY? What subsection of FRCP 11 governs? 2. Cannot award monetary sanctions sua sponte if show cause order issued before any voluntary settlement or dismissal 3. Court must consider financial status of a Rule 11 offender 4. Duty to mitigate

32. SANCTIONS ORDERS What does 11©(3) provide?

33. PROGRESS FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK v. NATWEST State or federal court? What procedural stage has this action reached? What procedural issue must the court decide?

34. PROGRESS FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK v. NATWEST How does the court rule on this issue? What is the court’s reasoning?

35. PRACTICE EXERCISE 11 Consider all four counts of the complaint and advise as to what, if any, additional factual or legal investigation is needed as to any count. Are there any allegations in the complaint for which the partner should use the hedging language permitted by FRCP 11(b)(3)?