1. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter 19 Forensic Psychology

2. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Perspectives and History Forensic Psychology – Application of psychology to the law and the legal profession – Forensic psychologists provide testimony and expertise in legal cases

3. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Perspectives and History Background – 1908: Prominence rises with On the Witness Stand Hugo Munsterberg – 1962: Acceptance as expert witnesses – Continual resistance from legal types – Growth of specific professional journals

4. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Perspectives and History Professional Issues – Training Basic clinical experience Legal knowledge Ethics Clinical forensics – Growing number of focused programs

5. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Perspectives and History Ethics and Standards – Completeness and accuracy of qualifications – Technical and scientific accuracy – Impartiality – APA guide for standards

6. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness

7. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness – Helps to understand and evaluate evidence – Determine facts at issue – Offers opinions – Qualifications Professional training Judge has final decision – Relevance and validity Influence of Daubert case – Intended to establish a more liberal standard for the admissibility of expert evidence – Has actually resulted in more restrictive criteria

8. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness Clinical qualifications – Education and training – Relevant experience – Research and publication – Knowledge and application of principles – Use of special tests or measurements Expert testimony must be – Reliable, relevant, helpful, and fitting

9. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness

10. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness

11. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. The Expert Witness Strategies for cross-examination – Be prepared – Be honest – Admit weaknesses – Talk in meaningful terms – Listen carefully to wording of questions – Take time to think

12. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Criminal Cases Insanity plea – Low success rate – Burden of proof on the accused – Legal term, NOT medical or psychological – 3 standards: M’Naghten rule Durham standard ALI standard

13. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Criminal Cases Competency to stand trial – State of mind during the trial period – More common than insanity Ability to appreciate the charges Cooperate reasonably with counsel Appreciate proceedings of the court

14. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Civil Cases Commitment to Mental Institutions – Involuntary commitment Dangerous and misused power 1 day to 3 weeks – Voluntary commitment May leave at any time Not as voluntary as it may appear – Pressure from family, friends, doctors – Court hearing to commit Must be dangerous, disturbed/disabled, require treatment

15. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Civil Cases Domestic Issues – Abuse – Parental fitness – Child custody “Best interest of the child” Joint custody – APA standards » Child’s developmental needs » Each parent’s strengths and weaknesses » Family interactions

16. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Rights of Patients Individualized treatments Physical environments Labor rights Visitation control Dignity and privacy

17. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Predicting Dangerousness Tarasoff case Highly over-predicted Indicators – Specific kinds of violence – Historical data – Certain circumstances or settings

18. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Psychological Treatment Right to treatment – Right to refusal Restoring competence Emotional support for those facing incarceration

19. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Consultation Jury selection – Voir dire – Peremptory challenges: a set number of challenge each side uses to remove jurors suspected of bias Jury Shadowing – Hire analogous jurors – Monitor reactions to testimony – Predict jury decisions

20. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Consultation

21. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Consultation Public opinion surveys – Trademark lawsuits – Determine if change in venue needed Witness preparation – Help witness present testimony better without modifying facts – Preparing for pressures of the stand – “Gray areas” Preparation can possibly influence testimony

22. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Consultation Convincing the jury – Strategies for lawyers to present case and evidence in most efficient way – Predicting responses of jury – Molding opening and closing statements for greatest effect

23. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Research and Forensic Psychology Eyewitness testimony – Fallibility Often unreliable and inaccurate – Information distortion – Inferences based on expectations

24. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Research and Forensic Psychology Eyewitness testimony – Affecting factors Stress levels Information storage Personal bias Stereotypes Weapons Age

25. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Research and Forensic Psychology Lineups – APA recommendations Person conducting line up does not know suspect Witness told suspect may or may not be present Suspect does not stand out in appearance Confirmation/ assessment of confidence before feedback

26. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Research and Forensic Psychology Jury behavior – Role of instructions Wording Order – Grouping of charges Multiple charges presented together or separately Harsher sentences when charges grouped together