Presentation on theme: ""Will the new equality duty deliver progress for disabled people?""— Presentation transcript:
1 "Will the new equality duty deliver progress for disabled people?" Caroline GoodingEquality Consultant
2 I will discuss: Background the disability equality duty What are the disability equality duties?What do we know about the impact of the disability equality duty?How is the revised Equality Duty likely to impact on disability equality?
3 Disability Discrimination Act 2005 General DutySpecific dutiesSecretary of State DutyIn force from December 2006
4 Theoretical foundations Recognition of institutionalised discrimination and the need for tools to tackle this, not just individual rights challenges‘the social model of disability’
5 Background to the duty Legal antecedents: Section 75 Northern Ireland Act 1998 andRace Relations (Amendment) Act 2000.Political and policy backgroundGood Friday AgreementStephen Lawrence inquiryDisability Rights Taskforce Report 1999
6 Equality duties introduced A new positive requirement: to promote equality, not just to stop discriminatingA new approach to implementing law in this area: ‘enforced self-regulation’
7 promote equal opportunities eliminate unlawful discrimination Every public authority shall in carrying out their functions have due regard to the need to:promote equal opportunitieseliminate unlawful discriminationeliminate disability related harassment;promote positive attitudes towards disabled persons encourage participation by disabled persons in public life and
8 …give due regard tothe need to take steps to take account of disabled persons’ disabilities, even where that involves treating disabled person more favourably than other personsUnder-pinning principle
9 Disability Equality Schemes Showing how it intends to fulfill its dutiesStatement of involvement of disabled people in its developmentStatement of equality impact assessment methodsAction planEvidence gathering: employment; educational opportunities; services and other functions - extent to which they take into account disabled people’s needs
10 Specific disability equality duties Involve disabled people in developing Disability Equality SchemePublish schemeDemonstrate have taken actions in scheme (unless it would be unreasonable and impractical to do so)Report on progressReview and revise scheme
11 Secretaries of StateMust publish every three years an overview of the progress made by public authorities in their policy sector in relation to disability equality.And set out proposals for co-ordination of action by public authorities in that policy sector to bring about further progress on disability equality
12 Theoretical foundations Modern regulatory theoryEvidence basedRegulation should build on self-interest of regulatedRegulation is improved by bringing in the views of those directly affectedCongruent with “nothing about us without us’ principle of disability movement
13 3 foundations for regulation for equality Requirement on organizations:to examine what they are doing on the basis of firm evidenceto consider alternative approaches to shift entrenched patterns of inequality, which must be monitored by an external authoritative bodyto engage with stakeholders in civil society who will regularly challenge their assumptions.
14 EnforcementCommission: Has power to conduct an assessment of compliance with the general and the specific duties (a compliance notice can be subsequently issued)Interested parties: can enforce general duty by judicial review
15 Research: compliancePublic Bodies’ Response to the Disability Equality Duty: An audit of compliance with the requirement to publish a disability equality scheme Ipsos Mori 200772% had scheme75% of sampled schemes showed evidence of having involved disabled people.
16 Common messages from research the importance of the involvement of disabled people,the success of the duty in raising the profile of disability equality including into areas where it had previously not been seen to be relevant, andits failure to produce clear evidence of improved outcomes – are echoed in other studies.
17 Value of involvementThe public sector equality duties, Making an impact (Schneider Ross, 2007)Progress on disability was only slightly less than on race‘This fits with anecdotal data. At the stakeholder discussions practitioners were particularly enthusiastic about the impact of the public sector duty in encouraging consultation and (more significantly) about the on-going involvement of disabled people’.72% of respondents said that involvement of disabled people contributed to successful implementation of the DED.
18 The benefits for public services of involving disabled people, DRC 2007 ‘If you are a disability practitioner, you are pretty much a lone one. If you have got the voice of students and staff behind you, you have a much more powerful message. It is not just me; it is me and 100 others. It is numbers and proof.’ (Student Welfare Officer, Ravensbourne College of Design and Communication)
19 Making practice happen EHRC 2009 Key findings:The requirement for race equality schemes, and equality impact assessments provide a framework and focus for actionThe specific duty to involve disabled people has ensured a step change in policy and services:“While it is recognised that there is still much to do across the public services, disabled people’s involvement has provided a spotlight on generic and specific services to meet their needs. It has also provided a catalyst for wider participation across all equality strands. Significant local and national accountability mechanisms have been developed across the country to the extent that there is a strong plea for the extension of the involvement duty to all strands.”
20 Making practice happen EHRC 2009 “The Secretary of States’ specific duty to report on disability across each sector has created a significant shift in central government’s understanding and response to disability equality.”
21 Examination of the Implementation of the Disability Equality Duty in England Office for Disability Issues 2008Disabled interviewee, described as having been involved in disability issues for a long time, : “I feel as though this is going at a reasonable pace, and I think there’s been huge changes in the last five years compared with what we had before.”
22 Examination of the Implementation of the Disability Equality Duty in England Office for Disability Issues 2008“ All of the Managers in the organisation are supposed to buy into it and actually deliver on what it says, how it relates to their area of work, but I have to be honest with you that they’re generally pretty poor.” (Transport Target, Senior Manager)
23 Improve enforcement or improve the duty? Regulators hugely importantEHRC not seen as effectivePerhaps require equality outcome objectives to be set (as gender duty)
24 Gender equality dutySchemes must set out objectives which it has identified as being necessary for it to perform its general equality dutyMust achieve the fulfilment of the objectives unless unreasonable or impracticable
25 Single Equality Act 2010New Equality Duty will bring together the three existing duties (disability, race and gender) and extend to:gender reassignment,age,pregnancy and maternity,sexual orientation andreligion or belief
26 New Equality DutyRetains requirement for authorities to give due regard to:eliminating unlawful discrimination and harassment;advancing equality of opportunity; andadvancing good relations between different groups.
27 The Act says that advancing equality of opportunity involves in particular the need to: (a) remove or minimise disadvantage(b) take steps to meet the needs of people who share a protected characteristic(c) encourage people who share a protected characteristic to participate in public life or in any other activity in which participation is disproportionately low.s.149
28 The Act says that steps to meet disabled people’s needs Includes in particular steps to take account of disabled people’s disabilities
29 The Act says that fostering good relations requires in particular: Tackling prejudicePromoting understanding
30 Proposed specific duties Public authorities must: Set one or more equality outcome objectives – and review at least every 4 yearsPublish equality data annuallyEquality Act 2010: The public sector equality duty Promoting equality through transparency August 2010
31 What equality outcome objectives must be set? one or more objectives which the authority reasonably thinks that it should achieve in order to further one or more of the aims set out in the general equality dutymust be specific and measurable; and authorities should set out how progress towards the objective(s) will be measured
32 Public bodies with more than 150 employees must publish Employment data in relation to ‘the protected characteristics of employees’Code and guidance will provide further guidance on which information should be published by different types of public bodies.The Government “expect this to include data on important inequalities such as ..the distribution of disabled employees throughout an organisation’s structure.”
33 Authorities must also publish assessments of the equality impacts of its policies and practices, and the likely impact of its proposed policies and practices and the information taken into account in such assessmentsdetails of any engagement with persons it considered interested in the general equality duty
34 Weakens duties No mainstreaming Weaker self-regulation Minimal – if any- involvementWeaker central government and regulatory stateWeaker EHRC?
35 In place of regulation… “Our focus on transparency means that citizens themselves will be able to judge, challenge, applaud and hold to account public bodies in their performance of both the general duty and the specific duties. This new emphasis means that public bodies will be democratically accountable, and that citizens and representative groups will engage with public bodies in ensuring that they fulfil the aims of the Equality Duty.”
36 General Disability Equality Duty cases R (on application of Chavda and Others) v Harrow LBC 2007R (on the application of Lunt and another) v Liverpool City Council 2009