1. Common Core State Standards and Their Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice and Neglect Education

2. 2 About NDTAC  Contract between U.S. Department of Education and the American Institutes for Research  John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator, Title I, Part D, Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Program  NDTAC ’ s Mission:  Develop a uniform evaluation model  Provide technical assistance  Serve as a facilitator between different organizations, agencies, and interest groups  Join our listserv at http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/forms/listserv1.asp http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/forms/listserv1.asp

3. Title I, Part D and the Common Core Simon Gonsoulin

4. 4 Purpose of Title I, Part D  Ensure youth who are neglected or delinquent have the opportunity to meet the same challenging State academic standards that all children are expected to meet  Improve educational services for children and youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at risk of involvement with the juvenile justice system  Provide children and youth who are neglected or delinquent with the services needed to make a successful transition from institutions to schools and/or employment  Prevent youth who are at risk of academic failure from dropping out of school  Provide children and youth who have dropped out of school, or who are returning to school after residing in an institution, with a support system to ensure their continued education

5. 5 Purpose of Title I, Part D  Ensure youth who are neglected or delinquent have the opportunity to meet the same challenging State academic standards that all children are expected to meet  Improve educational services for children and youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at risk of involvement with the juvenile justice system  Provide children and youth who are neglected or delinquent with the services needed to make a successful transition from institutions to schools and/or employment  Prevent youth who are at risk of academic failure from dropping out of school  Provide children and youth who have dropped out of school, or who are returning to school after residing in an institution, with a support system to ensure their continued education

6. 6 Youth Characteristics Neglected  Over 700,000 youth are maltreated or at risk of maltreatment  450,000 children and youth were in foster care system in the U.S.  23-47% of these children and youth have received special education services Delinquent  2.18 million youth are arrested in the U.S. every year  Over 90,000 youth are detained on any given day  34% of youth in juvenile corrections have a diagnosable educational disability A disproportionate number of these youth have not acquired academic skills

7. 7 Youth Academic Outcomes Neglected  Higher rates of grade retention; lower scores on standardized tests; and higher absenteeism, tardiness, truancy, and dropout rates  Numerous changes in placement  “Fall through the cracks” as lines of responsibility and accountability for their educational outcomes are unclear  Often lack a consistent and knowledgeable adult advocate Delinquent  Reading and math skills are four years below age equivalent peers  High rates of suspension, retention in grade, and expulsion from school prior to and following placement  Extremely high mobility  Attending multiple schools, sometimes in multiple districts Poor academic outcomes contributes to higher than average rates of homelessness, criminality, drug abuse, & unemployment

8. 8 Implications of the Common Core State Standards Can the use of the common core state standards provide the following for youth who are involved in systems?  Common measure/yardstick to determine educational achievement/outcomes  “Level the playing field” for youth who enter and exit schools multiple times  Consistent content for instruction across traditional, special and correctional educational settings  Standardized curriculum scope and sequence for instruction  Standardized expectations for all learners regardless of behaviors (e.g., delinquency, mental health)

9. NDTAC Webinar January 20, 2011 Carrie Heath Phillips Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) Carrieh@ccsso.org

10.  State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and National Governors Association (NGA) Common Core State Standards Initiative

11. What are educational standards? Why do they matter?

12. Why do we need common standards? Why now?  Disparate standards across states  Global competition  Today’s jobs require different skills  For many young people, a high school degree isn’t preparing them for college or a good job

13. Why is This Important for Students, Teachers, and Parents?  Prepares students with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college and work  Ensures consistent expectations regardless of a student’s zip code  Provides educators, parents, and students with clear, focused guideposts  Offers economies of scale

14. Foundation for the Standards Aligned with college and work expectations  Prepare students for success in entry-level, credit-bearing, academic college courses (2- and 4- year postsecondary institutions)  Prepare students for success in careers that offer competitive, livable salaries above the poverty line, opportunities for career advancement, and are in growing or sustainable industries

15. Standards Development Process  College- and career-readiness standards for English/language arts and mathematics developed summer of 2009  Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12 standards for each grade were developed  Continual input throughout the process from educators and business and higher education leaders  Public comment period with nearly 10,000 responses  Final standards released on June 2, 2010

16. As of January 20 th, 40 states and DC have fully adopted the Common Core State Standards; 3 states have provisionally adopted the standards; and 1 state has adopted the ELA standards only.

17. What’s in the Standards

18. Intentional design limitations The standards do NOT define:  How teachers should teach  All that can or should be taught  The nature of advanced work beyond the core  The interventions needed for students well below grade level  The full range of support for English learners and students with special needs  Everything needed for students to be college and career ready

19. Applications  Applications for English language learners  Learn academic content while learning English. English proficiency is not a prerequisite to students achieving the goals laid out in the standards.  Application for students with disabilities  “Students with disabilities are a heterogeneous group with one common characteristic: the presence of disabling conditions that significantly hinder their abilities to benefit from general education.” (IDEA 34 CFR §300.39, 2004) Therefore, how these high standards are taught and assessed is of the utmost importance in reaching this diverse group of students. “Promoting a culture of high expectations for all students is a fundamental goal of the Common Core State Standards.”

20. STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH/LANGUAGE ARTS (ELA) & LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS

21. Design and Organization Introduction  Description of capacities of a literate student (e.g., demonstrate independence, come to understand other perspectives and cultures) Three main sections  K−5 cross-disciplinary  6−12 English language arts  6−12 literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects Three appendices A: Research and evidence; glossary of key terms B: Reading text exemplars; sample performance tasks C: Annotated student writing samples

22. In developing knowledge and skills in English/language arts, learners:  Demonstrate independence  Build strong content knowledge  Respond to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline  Comprehend as well as critique  Value evidence  Use technology and digital media strategically and capably  Come to understand other perspectives and cultures "Habits of mind" fostered by the Common Core State Standards

23. Design and Organization Four strands:  Reading  Writing  Speaking and Listening  Language An integrated model of literacy Media requirements blended throughout

24. ELA Key Advances Reading  Balance of literature and informational texts  Text complexity Writing  Emphasis on argument and informative/explanatory writing  Writing about sources Standards for reading and writing in history/ social studies, science, and technical subjects  Complement rather than replace content standards in those subjects  Responsibility of teachers in those subjects

25. MATHEMATICS STANDARDS

26. Design and Organization Standards for Mathematical Practice  Carry across all grade levels  Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert student Standards for Mathematical Content  K-8 standards presented by grade level  High school standards presented by conceptual theme Appendix  Designing high school math courses based on the Common Core State Standards

27. In developing knowledge and skills in mathematics, learners:  Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them  Reason abstractly and quantitatively  Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.  Model with mathematics  Use appropriate tools strategically  Attend to precision  Look for and make use of structure  Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning "Habits of mind" fostered by the Common Core State Standards

28. Math Key Advances  Focus in early grades on number (arithmetic and operations) to build a solid foundation in math  Evened out pace across the grades  Focus on using math and solving complex problems, similar to what would see in the real world in high school  Emphasize problem-solving and communication

29. What’s Next?  States are implementing the standards now  Plans vary based on state context  Redesigning professional development in 2011  Major changes in instructional materials, graduation requirements, etc., not expected until 2013 or later  Teachers will start teaching to the Common Core State Standards in 2013 or 2014 school year

30. What’s Next with Testing?  New tests tied to the Common Core State Standards will be live in 2014-2015 school year  New assessments will be computer-based and given several times throughout the year  Beyond multiple choice and more focus on application of knowledge  Two different consortia are developing assessments, so instead of every state having their own test, there will be only two different types of testing programs throughout the nation

31. www.corestandards.org