1. 1 Who Counts? Census Taking in the United States, 2000 Margo Anderson University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee

2. 2 Margo J. Anderson and Stephen E. Fienberg (1999). Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (Revised Paperback Ed, 2001)

3. 3 Census Encyclopedia

4. 4

5. 5 Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers….The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct."

6. 6 The Census leads to…. Reapportionment: Reapportionment is the process of reallocating or seats among the states in the House of Representatives after a decennial census. Redistricting: Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of legislative districts on the basis of new population data. Admission of new states to the union

7. 7 Importance of the Census The United States was the first nation in the history of the world to take a population census and use it allocate seats in a national assembly according to population. The U.S. has had one of the most demographically dynamic and diverse populations in the history of the world.

8. 8 Growth of the U.S Population

9. 9 Reapportionment Every decade, seats in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College are “reapportioned” on the basis of the census count. From 1790 to 1910, Congress also increased the size of the House of Representatives when it reapportioned the seats.

10. 10 Reapportionment House districts were initially around 30,000 people. The average size of a congressional district based on the Census 2000 apportionment population is 646,952, more than triple the average district size of 193,167 based on the 1900 census apportionment.

11. 11 Redistricting: A Major Political Process Every Ten Years Once the census results are published, and House seats allocated among the states, the states “redistrict” their Congressional delegations. They also redraw the districts in the state legislatures on the basis of population changes. Local governments do the same.

12. 12 Growth in the Size of the House of Representatives

13. 13 Admitting States to the Union

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21 The First Gerrymander, 1812

22. 22

23. 23 Counting vs. Estimation Ongoing debate and controversy in the U.S. and elsewhere. Census data are fallible and often fraught with error. Census-taking is a statistical process and is enhanced by the use of the statisticians full arsenal.

24. 24 Planning Census 2000 Controversies from 1990 affected 2000 planning: cost and quality of data Republicans and Democrats took opposing positions on census methods……. Could the differential undercount of minorities be lessened with a sample survey and dual systems estimation?

25. 25 Planning... Newt Gingrich sued Bill Clinton over sampling The Supreme Court decided (January 1999): –Sampling could not be used for non response follow up –Sampling could be used for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Program

26. 26 The Advertising Campaign Census participation is a “civic” duty Census Director Kenneth Prewitt conducts a highly visible promotional campaign Congress appropriates $167 million for a professional advertising campaign Census website provides daily updates of response rates (March-April 2000)

27. 27 Census 2000 in Process A mail census to 120 million addresses (March 2000) Response rate: 67% for short form The long form controversy –one sixth of households receive long form –radio talk show hosts challenge long form –George W. Bush and Trent Lott sympathize with those who do not want to fill out the form

28. 28 Sampling for Coverage Evaluation 314,000 households surveyed in summer 2000 Results were matched to April returns Commerce Department (Clinton administration) gives Census Bureau authority on whether to adjust the census

29. 29 American Community Survey The long form controversy leads to new spotlight on Census Bureau’s proposal to replace the long form in 2010 ACS will be compared to 2000 long form results Census Bureau proposes full implementation in 2003 Funding is not assured

30. 30 Race and Ethnicity in the Census The rest of the constitutional language: –“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”

31. 31 Classification of Race and Ethnicity “Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity,” are promulgated by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) The new classification of race permits respondents to “select one or more” racial group.

32. 32 Race and Ethnicity, continued Categories for race: –American Indian or Alaska Native –Asian – Black or African American – Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander –White –Other (on census) Categories for ethnicity: –Hispanic or Latino – Not Hispanic or Latino

33. 33 The Statistical Policy Directive can be tabulated in 63 census racial groups, that is the six main groups plus 57 multiple combinations. The 63 groups can be cross classified by Hispanic origin, allowing for 126 racial and ethnic categories. Race and Ethnicity, continued

34. 34 Apportionment Results On December 28, 2000, Director Prewitt announced a population of 281,424,177 An increase of 33 million from 1999 13.2% growth rates was fastest in half century 12 congressional seats changed

35. 35

36. 36 Winners and Losers Winners –Georgia –Florida –Texas –Arizona –California –North Carolina –Colorado –Nevada Losers –Connecticut –New York –Pennsylvania –Ohio –Indiana –Michigan –Wisconsin –Oklahoma –Mississippi

37. 37 Redistricting Data and Decision not to Adjust The redistricting file, PL 94 171, must be released by April 1, 2001 The Bush administration opposed sampling and revoked the rule delegating authority to the Census Bureau Acting Director Barron announced a decision not to adjust the redistricting file on March 1

38. 38

39. 39 Redistricting, continued... ESCAP “determined that they could not conclude that the data for legislative redistricting collected during Census 2000 would be improved by adjustment through the statistical method known as sampling.” Dueling Estimates: –Census: 281.4 –Demographic Analysis: 279.6 –ACE adjusted: 284.7

40. 40 Census Geography

41. 41 Demographic Results Race and ethnicity: –75.1% White –12.3% Black or African American –3.6% Asian –.9% American Indian, Alaska Native –.1% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander Race and ethnicity… –2.4% two or more races –5.5% some other race –Hispanic population grew 58% during the 1990s, to 35.3 million.

42. 42 Congressional Apportionment and the Cube Root of Population