Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin."— Presentation transcript:

1 Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

2 How does Response to Instruction relate to Plan 2020? Plan 2020 focuses on the following data elements: ▫Achievement ▫Gap ▫Graduation Rate ▫Attendance

3 Achievement Achievement is based upon the percentage of proficient students meeting the Annual Measureable Objective (AMO) in the areas of reading/language and mathematics. The AMO’s will be identified by the school.

4 Gaps The Gaps will be identified using non proficiencies in reading, language arts, math and the graduation rate. The Gap group will consist of students identified in the following subgroups: ▫Black ▫Hispanic ▫English Learners ▫Poverty (free and reduced lunch) ▫Special Education

5 Graduation Rate The graduation rates will be calculated using both four-year and five-year cohort rates.

6 Annual Measureable Objectives AMO’s will be set in equal increments with the goal of reducing half of the percentage of students in the “all student” group and each subgroup who are not proficient within six years.

7 Attendance The goal for the attendance rate is 95% or higher.

8 How will team members know RtI is being implemented in the schools? Academic Look Fors ▫Universal screening data  STAR Reading STAR Reading  Global Scholar Global Scholar ▫DIBELSDIBELS  Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring ▫AR Data ▫Progress monitoring tools (Tiers 2 and 3) ▫End of Course Assessment ▫Current level of performance ▫Extended Day data ▫Local school dataLocal school data ▫Gizmo ReportsGizmo Reports Behavior Look Fors ▫School wide discipline plan ▫Review 360 ▫Behavior Plan ▫Suspension DataSuspension Data ▫Retract/Detention/ Saturday SchoolRetract

9 How will the team know that the RtI process is being implemented? PST Meetings ▫Schedules of how often meetings are taking place (Every 3-6 weeks) ▫Sign in sheets of who attends the meetings. Principals and or assistant principals, general education teachers, counselors and other specialists as needed. (Coaches, Speech Pathologists, EL Teachers, Intervention Teachers) ▫Use of PST Student Intervention form ( PST Manual, p. 31-32)

10 What should team members see while observing? Use of flexible grouping of students Evidence of varied levels of support Implementation of researched based intervention strategies Provision of additional support and resources (peer tutors, one on one instruction, second delivery)

11 What kinds of questions should team members ask? When and where will additional support be provided? Who will provide support to struggling students? Does the schedule allow time to implement the intervention plan consistently? What types of data did you use to identify students? How often are students being monitored for progress and what are you using? How will the school know when the student is ready to exit PST?

12 How will team members know if interventions are working? Reduced course failures Academic Improvement/Progress Monitoring using grades and programs Improvement of skill deficit areas through progress monitoring Behavior improvement Reduction in suspensions Reduced numbers in Retract/Detention/Saturday School/Extended Day


Download ppt "Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google