1. Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom February 2011

2. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting2 St. Petersburg College Presenters  Dr. James Coraggio, Director, Academic Effectiveness and Assessment

3. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting3 Assessment Basics Why do we assess?  To see how well we are doing  To confirm what we already know  To share our progress with others  To see where we can improve and change  In some cases to demonstrate what does not work J

4. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting4 Assessment Basics Source: http://www.c-pal.net/course/module2/pdf/Week1_Lesson5.pdf Why do we assess? J

5. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Purpose of an Assessment  “Clearly delineate between those that know the content and those that do not.”  To determine whether the student knows the content, not whether the student is a good test- taker.  Likewise, confusing and tricky questions should be avoided to prevent incorrect responses from students who know the material. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting5 J

6. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Types of Assessments  Objective assessments  Authentic assessment February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting6 J

7. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting7 Objective Assessments  Measure several types of learning (also levels)  Wide content, short period of time  Variations for flexibility  Easy to administer, score, and analyze  Scored more reliability and quickly C

8. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting8 Types of Objective Tests  Written-response  Completion (fill-in-the-blank)  Short answer  Selected-response  Alternative response (two options)  Matching  Keyed (like matching)  Multiple choice C

9. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example I  Multiple Choice Assessment  Assignment Objectives  Solving equations using addition and multiplication principles  Solving applied problems by translating to equations February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting9 C

10. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example I  Multiple Choice Assessment 1)55 + 4x = 83 2)My age is equal to three times my age minus 48. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting10 C

11. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Issues with Objective Assessments  Limited depth of content  Not able to reveal student misconceptions  Limited ability to test critical thinking skills  Students are ‘Test-wise’ February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting11 C

12. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Test-wise Students  Are familiar with item formats  Use informed and educated guessing  Avoid common mistakes  Have testing experience  Use time effectively  Apply various strategies to solve different problem types February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting12 C

13. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Authentic Experiences  Is the course aligned with the expectations for the student in the ‘real-world’?  Authentic Learning  Authentic Assessment February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting13 J

14. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting14 Class Without Authentic Experiences  Didactic instruction where students are presented with factual information from a text book  Assessment is primarily multiple choice items where students are expected to regurgitate factual information J

15. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting15 Class With Authentic Experiences  Interactive learning environment where students not only learn facts but the relationship between the facts and the application of that information  Authentic assessment where students are able to model the applications of the discipline through simulations, projects, etc. J

16. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting16 Authentic Assessments  Authentic assessments serve dual purposes of  encouraging students to think critically and  providing assessment data for measuring improved student learning.  These assessment techniques fall into three general categories:  criterion-referenced rubrics,  student reports (reflection or self-assessments), and  student portfolios. J

17. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting17 Authentic Assessments Authentic assessments include…  Criterion-referenced rubrics. Complex, higher-order objectives can be measured only by having students create a unique product, whether written or oral [in-class essays, speeches, term papers, videos, computer programs, blueprints, or artwork] (Carey, 2000).  Student Reflection. Written reflection is espoused to have several important benefits: it can deepen the quality of critical thinking, increase active involvement in learning, and increase personal ownership of the new learning by the student (Moon, 1999).  Student Portfolios. Collections of students’ work over a course or a program and can be an effective method of demonstrating student progress in the area of critical thinking (Carey, 2000). J

18. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example II  Authentic Assessment: Building a Fence  Assignment Objectives  Solving Equations using addition and multiplication principles  Solving applied problems by translating to equations February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting18 C

19. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example II You want to fence in part of your backyard. The dimensions of the fenced yard are shown in the diagram below. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting19 The fence will have a 10ft gate and a vertical support pole every 10 ft. 10 ft Gate: $100 Vertical Support Poles: $5 each Chain Link Fencing: $2 per foot C

20. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example II A.Write and graph an equation for the cost of building a fence that has the cost per foot and one gate. Let y = total cost of the fence x = cost per foot B. Using the given information and the equation from Part A, how much will it cost to build the fence? C. Suppose chain link fencing is sold only in 50 ft length rolls. You don’t want to waste or throw away any fencing. How much wider does the yard need to be to use all the fencing in the rolls? February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting20 C

21. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting21 Rubrics What is a rubric?  Scoring guidelines, consisting of specific pre-established performance criteria, used in evaluating student work on performance assessments C

22. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting22 Rubrics SPC currently uses rubrics in such programs as…  College of Education  College of Nursing  Paralegal Studies Program C

23. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting23 Rubric Development Process 1.Re-examine the learning objectives to be addressed by the task 2.Identify specific observable attributes your students should demonstrate 3.Describe characteristics at each attribute 4.Write narrative descriptions for each level of continuum 5.Collect samples of student work 6.Score student work and identify samples that exemplify various levels 7.Revise the rubric as needed Repeat as Needed J

24. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting24 Assignment Profile  Designed to provide consistency and accuracy as well as provide guidelines for the use  Rubric is an evaluation ‘tool’, but for a tool to be effective it must be in the correct situation or ‘job.’ It would be inefficient to use a machete to conduct heart surgery.  Rubric must be aligned to the most appropriate course assignment  The instructor is the assessment instrument not the rubric J

25. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example III  Rubric: STA2023 Sampling Project  Assignment Objectives  Identify the sampling strategies commonly employed to collect data  Describe potential biases encountered with sampling strategies used in various statistical applications  Suggest strategies to avoid potential biases when using sampling to collect data for a statistical application February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting25 J/C

26. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example III Management at a retail store is concerned about the possibility of drug abuse by people who work there. They decide to check on the extent of the problem by having a random sample of the employees undergo a drug test. The lawyers for the retail store have assured the management that there are no legal issues with the proposed drug testing as long as the individual test results are not identified to a specific employee. Depending the extent of illegal drugs identified in the drug testing, drug counseling may be offered to all employees under the promise of complete confidentiality. You have been hired as the statistician who will design the sampling plan. The budget for the drug testing will cover the cost of 40 drug tests. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting26 J/C

27. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example III Management has proposed several different ideas about the best way to obtain the random sample of 40 employees who will be drug tested. There are currently 500 employees at this retail store. There are four classifications of employees: supervisors, full-time sales clerks, part- time sales clerks and maintenance staff. These sampling possibilities are listed below:  Select one of the employee classifications and sample all employees in that classification.  Choose every fourth person who clocks in for each shift.  Randomly select 10 employees from each classification.  Each employee has a three-digit employee number. Randomly select 40 employees. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting27 J/C

28. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assignment Example III Answer the following questions regarding this scenario:  Define this problem in your own words.  Compare and contrast the four proposed sampling plans.  Select one of the proposed sampling plan that you feel is most appropriate for this situation and defend your choice.  Describe any weaknesses in your selected sampling plan.  Make suggestions on ways to improve/strengthen the sampling plan. You may include information not described in the scenario above.  Reflect on your own thought process after completing the assignment. “What did you learn from this process?” “What would you do differently next time to improve?” February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting28 J/C

29. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 May 21, 2010 Faculty Champion Meeting29 Assessment Rubric for CT Performance Element Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Emerging (1) Not Present (0) I. Communication Define problem in your own words. Identifies the main idea or problem with numerous supporting details and examples which are organized logically and coherently. Identifies the main idea or problem with some supporting details and examples in an organized manner. Identifies the main idea or problem with few details or examples in a somewhat organized manner. Identifies the main idea or problem poorly with few or no details or states the main idea or problem verbatim from the text. Does not identify the main idea or problem. II. Analysis Compare & contrast the available solutions. Uses specific inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences regarding premises; addresses implications and consequences; identifies facts and relevant information correctly. Uses logical reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; addresses implications and consequences; Identifies facts and relevant information correctly. Uses superficial reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; Shows some confusion regarding facts, opinions, and relevant, evidence, data, or information. Makes unexplained, unsupported, or unreasonable inferences regarding solutions; makes multiple errors in distinguishing fact from fiction or in selecting relevant evidence. Does not analyze multiple solutions. III. Problem Solving Select & defend your final solution. Thoroughly identifies and addresses key aspects of the problem and insightfully uses facts and relevant evidence from analysis to support and defend potentially valid solutions. Identifies and addresses key aspects of the problem and uses facts and relevant evidence from analysis to develop potentially valid conclusions or solutions. Identifies and addresses some aspects of the problem; develops possible conclusions or solutions using some inappropriate opinions and irrelevant information from analysis. Identifies and addresses only one aspect of the problem but develops untestable hypothesis; or develops invalid conclusions or solutions based on opinion or irrelevant information. Does not select and defend a solution.

30. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 May 21, 2010 Faculty Champion Meeting30 Assessment Rubric for CT Performance Element Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Emerging (1) Not Present (0) IV. Evaluation Identify weaknesses in your final solution. Insightfully interprets data or information; identifies obvious as well as hidden assumptions, establishes credibility of sources on points other than authority alone, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support. Accurately interprets data or information; identifies obvious assumptions, establishes credibility of sources on points other than authority alone, avoids fallacies in reasoning; distinguishes appropriate arguments from extraneous elements; provides sufficient logical support. Makes some errors in data or information interpretation; makes arguments using weak evidence; provides superficial support for conclusions or solutions. Interprets data or information incorrectly; Supports conclusions or solutions without evidence or logic; uses data, information, or evidence skewed by invalid assumptions; uses poor sources of information; uses fallacious arguments. Does not evaluate data, information, or evidence related to final solution. V. Synthesis Suggest ways to improve/strengthen your final solution. Insightfully relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; uses new information to enhance final solution; recognizes missing information; correctly identifies potential effects of new information. Accurately relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; uses new information to enhance final solution; correctly identifies potential effects of new information. Inaccurately or incompletely relates concepts and ideas from multiple sources; shallow determination of effect of new information on final solution. Poorly integrates information from more than one source to support final solution; Incorrectly predicts the effect of new information on final solution. Does not identify new information for final solution.

31. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 May 21, 2010 Faculty Champion Meeting31 Assessment Rubric for CT Performance Element Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Emerging (1) Not Present (0) VI. Reflection Reflect on your own thought process. “What did you learn from this process?” “What would you do differently next time to improve?” Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, and evaluates them in the context of alternate points of view. Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, with some comparisons of alternate points of view. Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives; recognizes some assumptions, values and perspectives of others; shallow comparisons of alternate points of view. Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives; does not consider alternate points of view. Does not reflect on own thinking.

32. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Assessment Basics  Alignment of course objectives  Competency, clarity, bias, level of difficulty  Validity and Reliability February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting32 C

33. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting33 Assessment Basics Alignment  Everything needs to align (objectives through assessment) C

34. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Competency  Items should test for the appropriate or adequate level of knowledge, skill, or ability (KSA) for the students.  Assessing lower division students on graduate level material is an ‘unfair’ expectation.  The competent student should do well on an assessment, items should not be written for only the top students in the class. February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting34 C

35. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Clarity  Clear, precise item and instruction  Correct grammar, punctuation, spelling  Address one single issue  Avoid extraneous material (teaching)  One correct or clearly best answer  Legible copies of exam February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting35 C

36. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Bias  Tests should be free from bias…  No stereotyping  No gender bias  No racial bias  No cultural bias  No religious bias  No political bias February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting36 C

37. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Level of Difficulty  Ideally, test difficulty should be aimed a middle level of difficulty. This can not always be achieved when the subject matter is based on specific expectations (i.e, workforce area). February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting37 J

38. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 Trivial and Trick Questions  Avoid trivia and tricks  Avoid humorous or ludicrous responses  Items should be straight forward, they should cleanly delineate those that know the material from those that do not  Make sure every item has value and that it is contributing to the final score February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting38 J

39. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting39 Assessment Basics Does one size fit all?  Assessments need to be valid  Assessments need to be reliable J

40. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting40 Validity Does the assessment measure what it is suppose to measure?  “Validation is the process of accumulating evidence that supports the appropriateness of inferences that are made of student responses…” (AERA, APA, & NCME, 1999) J

41. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting41 Types of Validity Evidence  Content Related - the extent to which a student’s responses to a given assessment reflect that student’s knowledge of the content area  Construct Related - the extent to which the responses being evaluated are appropriate indicators of the underlying construct  Criterion Related - the extent to which the results of the assessment correlate with a current or future event  Consequential – the consequences or use of the assessment results J

42. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting42 Reliability Consistency of the assessment scores  Types of reliability… Interrater Reliability – scores vary from instructor to instructor. Intrarater Reliability – scores vary from a single instructor from paper to paper  A test can be reliable and not valid, but never valid and not reliable J

43. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting43 Reliability Concerns Reliability 1.Are the score categories well defined? 2.Are the differences between the score categories clear? 3.Would two independent raters arrive at the same score for a given student response based on the scoring rubric? J

44. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting44 Improving Scoring Consistency  Provide grading rubrics or scoring criteria to students prior to assessment  Grade papers anonymously  Use anchor papers to define levels of proficiency for reference  Use multiple scorers  Calculate reliability statistics during training and grading J

45. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting45 Assessment Basics  Multiple Measures  Always to good to implement multiple measures when possible  Ideally direct and indirect measures of competency C

46. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting46 Indirect Methods  “indirect measures …help deepen the interpretation of student learning” (Maki, 2004).  SSI is a good example of an indirect measure. C

47. Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom 2011 February 2, 2011 Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting47 Questions/Next Steps

48. Veterinary Technology Staff Meeting Incorporating Authentic Assessment in the Classroom February 2011