Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ : Silicon VLSI Technology.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ : Silicon VLSI Technology."— Presentation transcript:

1 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ : Silicon VLSI Technology Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling by J. D. Plummer, M. D. Deal, and P. B. Griffin ECE 6466 “IC Engineering” Dr. Wanda Wosik Chapter 4 Cleaning Processes in Si Technology

2 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ FRONT END PROCESSES - CLEANING, LITHOGRAPHY, OXIDATION ION IMPLANTATION, DIFFUSION, DEPOSITION AND ETCHING Cleaning belongs to front end processes and is an important part of fabrication. Reference - ITRS Roadmap for Front End Processes (class website). Chapter 4

3 Semiconductor Manufacturing Clean Rooms, Wafer Cleaning and Gettering Importance of unwanted impurities increases with shrinking geometries of devices. 75% of the yield loss is due to defects caused by particles (1/2 of the min feature size) Crystal originated (45- 150nm) particles (COP) ~1,000Å=void with SiO x -> affect GOI -> anneal in H 2 -> oxide decomposes and surface reconstructs! & oxide precipitates from deep depth in Si. Yield -> 90% at the end -> 99% @ each step

4 Historical Development and Basic Concepts Contaminants and their role in devices (various elements, various films) Na +, Ka + X OX ~10nm Q M ≈ 6.5x10 11 cm -2,   V TN =0.1V (equivalent to 6.7*10 17 cm -3 or 10 ppm contaminations) !! !! Life time killers Poly-Si, silicides Particles cause defects QMQM

5 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING - CLEAN ROOMS, WAFER CLEANING AND GETTERING Modern IC factories employ a three tiered approach to controlling unwanted impurities: 1. clean factories 2. wafer cleaning 3. gettering Contaminants may consist of particles, organic films (photoresist), heavy metals or alkali ions. 2003 ITRS Front End processes - see class website Up till 2018

6 Dynamic Random Access Memory Leakage currents discharge the capacitor (mechanism SRH) refresh the charge storage (time ~ a few msec) Deep-level traps (Cu, Fe, Au etc.) Pile up at the surface where the devices are located. Lifetime must be > ~ 25 µsec Use gettering to keep N t  G ≈100µsec write, read V th ~10 7 cm/sec  ~10 -15 cm -2

7 Role of Surface Cleaning in Processing Oxide thickness [Å] Residual contaminants, layers affect kinetics of processes. Surface effects are very important (MORE) in scaled down devices

8 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Level 1 Contamination Reduction: Clean Factories Air quality is measured by the “class” of the facility. (Photo courtesy of Stanford Nanofabrication Facility.) Factory environment is cleaned by: Hepa filters and recirculation for the air, “Bunny suits” for workers. Filtration of chemicals and gases. Manufacturing protocols.

9 Level 1 Contamination Reduction: Clean Factories Class 1-100,000 mean number of particles, greater than 0.5  m, in a foot of air Particles ---> people, machines, supplies suitsMaterial filtersChemicals, water (use DI) Small particles remain in air (long) coagulate  large ones precipitate quickly and deposit on surfaces by (small) Brownian motion and gravitational sedimentation (larger). Use local clean rooms from Ex. Class 100 -> 5 particles/cm,  >0.1 µm in 1hr.

10 Level 2 Contamination Reduction: Wafer Cleaning Front End Process Back End Oxygen plasma Organic strippers (do not attack metals) 5 H 2 0 + H 2 O 2 + NH 4 OH SC1 Oxidizes organic films Oxidizes Si and complexes metals 6H 2 O : H 2 O 2 : HCl SC2 Small content reduces Si etch (0.05%) Removes alkali ions & cations Al 3+, Fe 3+, Mg 3+ (insoluble in NH 4 OH - SC1) H 2 S0 4 +H 2 O 2 Oxygen plasma Ultrasonic and now megasonic cleaning for particulates removal (20-50 kHz) Good clean for high T stepsLow T - less critical DI water is necessary: H 2 O H + +OH - [H + ]=[OH - ]=6x10 -13 cm -3 Diffusivity of:H + ≈9.3x10 -5 cm 2 s -1 -> µ H+ =qD/kT=3.59cm 2 V -1 s -1 of :OH - ≈5.3x10 -5 cm 2 s -1 -> µ OH- =qD/kT=2.04cm 2 V -1 s -1

11 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Level 2 Contamination Reduction: Wafer Cleaning RCA clean is “standard process” used to remove organics, heavy metals and alkali ions. Ultrasonic agitation is used to dislodge particles. with all contaminants -> H passivation (or F!) NH 4 OH small -> reduce surface roughness Not removed by SC1 HF dip added to remove oxide

12 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Level 3 Contamination Reduction: Gettering Gettering is used to remove metal ions and alkali ions from device active regions. For the alkali ions, gettering generally uses dielectric layers on the topside (PSG or barrier Si 3 N 4 layers). For metal ions, gettering generally uses traps on the wafer backside or in the wafer bulk. Backside = extrinsic gettering. Bulk = intrinsic gettering.

13 Gettering Concepts: contaminants freed  diffuse  become trapped Fast Diffusion of Various Impurities Metal contaminants will be trapped by dislocations and SF (decorate) and far away from ICs PSG (for alkali ions Na +, K + and metals) affects E fields (dipoles in PSG) and absorbs water leading to Al corrosion (negative effects) or Si 3 N 4 Closer to devices than to a backside layer -> high efficiency metals

14 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Heavy metal gettering relies on: Metals diffusing very rapidly in silicon. Metals segregating to “trap” sites.

15 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ “Trap” sites can be created by SiO 2 precipitates (intrinsic gettering), or by backside damage (extrinsic gettering). In intrinsic gettering, CZ silicon is used and SiO 2 precipitates are formed in the wafer bulk through temperature cycling at the start of the process. SiO 2 precipitates (white dots) in bulk of wafer. Intrinsic Gettering Oxygen ~ 10 18 cm -3 ; 15-20 ppm O i >20ppm -> too much precipitation-> strength decreases and warpage increases O i no precipitation-> no gettering denuded zone = oxygen free; thickness several tens of µm 50-100 µm in size Slow ramp 1-3 nm min size of nuclei, concentrations ≈ 10 11 cm -3 >> D dopants but D 0 << D metals

16 Intrinsic Gettering Due to Oxide Precipitates Precipitates (size) grow @ high T Density of nucleation sites grow @ low T The largest & the most dense defects -> the most efficient gettering

17 Measurement Methods Clean factories = particle control. Detect concentrations < 10/wafer of particles smaller than 0.1 µm Unpatterened wafers (blank) Count particles in microscope Laser scanning systems -> maps of particles down to ≈ 0.2 µm Patterned wafers Optical system compares a die with a “ known good reference ” die (adjacent die, chip design - its appearance) Image processing identifies defects (SEM) Test structure (not in high volume manufacturing)

18 Test Structures Trapped charge Q T  V TH change Dielectric breakdown due to particles, metals etc. Water – measure water resistivity  Deionized Water  =18.5 M  H 2 O  H + + OH - Models relate type of defects (typical for processes) with yields

19 Monitoring the Wafer Cleaning Efficiency Concentrations of impurities determined by surface analysis Primary beam – e - good lateral resolution Detected beam – e – good depth resolution and surface sensitivity X-raypoor depth resolution and poor surface sensitivity ions (SIMS)excellent ions (RBS)good depth resolution, reasonable sensitivity (0.1 atomic%) works with SEMHe + 1-3 MeV O + or Cs + sputtering and mass analyses Excite Identify (unique atomic signature) Count concentrations emitted

20 Electrons in Analytical Methods Inelastic collision with target electrons, which are then emitted from the solid Elastic collision of incoming electrons with atoms (reflected back) ~ the same energy as for the incoming electrons ~ 5 eV (as in SEM)

21 Analytical Techniques kicked out a core electron This scheme is for lighter elements (Z=33 as is crossover b/w Auger and X- Ray Several keV X-Ray Electron Spectroscopy Electron Microprobe If X-Ray is at the input: el. Emitted= X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) X-ray emitted= X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) XPS usually more dominant for lighter elements, XRF for heavier Auger El. Spectroscopy The core electron energy levels Several keV 1 3 2 1 2 3

22 Monitoring of Gettering Through Device Properties and Dielectric p – n leakage, refresh time DRAM junction and dielectric breakdown,  of n-p-n Material properties :  G (>>  R ) in the bulk and on the surface Photoconductive Decay Measurements ∆n=g op  G Carriers are generated due to light Decrease resistivity Recombine emission capture

23 = = + Carrier Generation Lifetime Deep Depletion - Return to Inversion via Carrier Generation (measure  G ) and surface recombination (s) DL inversion Zerbst technique: if plotted vs. (C min /C)-1 s=f(N ST,  ) Capture cross section

24 Lifetime Measurements: Open Circuit Voltage Decay Diode switched from ON V D when carriers recombine Measurements include surface and bulk recombination t=0 ≈0.7V off Use also DLTS: identifies traps (Et) and concentrations Thermal or photoexcitation processes in voltage modulable space-charge region (Schottky Diode, p-n, MOS Capacitor) Measured: capacitance, currents or conductance for t  >4

25 Excess Carrier Concentrations Decays: minority carriers  x=  tL/t d Experiment to calculate the diffusion constant D p, (n) for minority carriers (  p n ) -> µ p, (n) oscilloscope screen Pulse v d -> µ diffusion Drift: v d =L/t d µ p =v d /E drift Mobility of minority carriers

26 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Modeling Particle Contamination and Yield Particles of feature size cause defects ≈ 75% of yield loss in modern VLSI fabs is due to particle contamination. Yield models depend on information about the distribution of particles. Yields models use measured defect density N(d p ) and size (d p ) Particles on the order of 0.1 - 0.3 µm are the most troublesome: larger particles precipitate easily smaller ones coagulate into larger particles Yields are described by Poisson statistics in the simplest case. where A C is the critical area and D O the defect density. This model assumes independent randomly distributed defects and often underpredicts yields. Contamination Reduction Particles 10nm-10 µm N(d p )=K(d p ) -3 Even very small particles leads to failure (pinhole in the oxide )

27 Models and Simulations Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) Goal: monitor and control machines, recipes to improve YIELDS !!!!

28 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Use of negative binomial statistics eliminates these assumptions and is more accurate. where C is a measure of the particle spatial distribution (clustering factor). Yields depend on defects (D 0 ) density and chip size (A c ) (excluding ares of usual low yields (perimeter) C∞ NB P Defects are random and independent Predicts too low yields NB - less random/independent (ex. Clustering) Spacial distribution of defects Yields in ICs Fraction of failed ITRS needs

29 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Vertical lines are estimated chip sizes (from the ITRS). Note that defect densities will need to be extremely small in the future to achieve the high yields required for economic IC manufacturing. Yields in ICs NB Yield = f(D O ) MONITOR DEFECTS C=2 Defect density ≈40x40mm 2 Overall yield depends on each step in the manufacturing cycle

30 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Modeling Wafer Cleaning Cleaning involves removing particles, organics (photoresist) and metals from wafer surfaces. Particles are largely removed by ultrasonic agitation during cleaning. Organics like photoresists are removed in an O 2 plasma or in H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O 2 solutions. The “RCA clean” is used to remove metals and any remaining organics. Metal cleaning can be understood in terms of the following chemistry. (5) (6) If we have a water solution with a Si wafer and metal atoms and ions, the stronger reaction will dominate. Generally (6) is driven to the left and (5) to the right so that SiO 2 is formed and M plates out on the wafer. Good cleaning solutions drive (6) to the right since M + is soluble and will be desorbed from the wafer surface.

31 Contamination Reduction: Wafer Cleaning No models exist but good understanding of cleaning steps Remove metals by oxidizing (=removing e -> ions) and dissolving in cleaning solutions Si+2H 2 O SiO 2 +4H + +4e - M M Z + Z e - Ex. SiO 2 /Si Fe 3+ /Fe stronger potential Fe 3+ -> Fe. Fe is plating on Si, Si is oxidizing Add H 2 O 2 stronger potential -> Takes e - from M -> ions soluble in aqueous sol. Oxidizes Si Larger potential -> reaction to the left all others go to the right Use OZONE

32 Manufacturing Methods and Equipment Wafer Cleaning High-pH Oxidizes organics -> water soluble compounds and complexes IB IIB and other metals Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, Zn etc. Low-pH Insoluble in NH 4 OH

33 Gettering All metal atoms mobile (D Mi > D Ms 10x ) (Fig. 4.8!) D M >> D Dopantss Sol. Sol M I >>M S (Cu, Ni) Sol.Sol. M I <<M S (Au, Pt) Except of Ti, Mo, etc. Au S +I Au i kick-out mechanism Au s Au i +V dissociative or Frank-Turnbull mech. I increase improves gettering of Au V increase hinders gettering Ex. P diffusion, Ion Implant=damage, intrinsic gettering (=I ) “ I ” are closer to wafer surface

34 Metal Diffusion to the Gettering Sites Long time Au diffuses to the wafer back side and is trapped

35 Gettering of Au - the Role of the Back Side Injection of Si-I Metals diffuse much faster than I (silicon) D Si-I >> D Dopants I are generated at the back and diffuse -> Au i form, diffuse and get trapped At high T I-> gettering more effective, not limited by the backside injection

36 Trapping the Metal Atoms at the Gettering Sites Trapped by: ion implantation, P diffusion, laser damage, poly-Si films, mechanical damage, etc. But HOW? *Physical damage -> metal trapped at defect sites; binding energy E B depends on T ; Fraction Bound=(1-K 1 exp -E B /kT ) *Segregation, related to solubility (of substitutional Au) in the silicon perfect crystal and in the gettering region C Au,Si =N Si exp(-E A1 /kT) C Au,G =N G exp(-E A2 /kT) -> k 0 =(C Au,G +C Au,Si )/C Au,Si =1+K 2 exp-[(E A1 -E A2 )/kT] --> k 0 =1+N G /5x10 22 exp(0.82eV/kT) *Enhances sol.sol by high dopant concentrations: in “ n ” Au=acceptor, “ p ” - Au=donor Au+e - Au -, K eq =[Au - ]/([Au][e - ])=constant, [Au - i ]/[Au]n i = [Au - n ]/[Au]n or [Au - n ]/[Au - i ] = n/n i Au acceptor in “ n + ” Si (100x if N=7.14x10 18 -> 10 21 cm -3 *Ion pairing model -> AuP less strain * Coulombic attraction Au+P -> Au - P + * Interaction with point defects V - in “ n + ” Au i +V - Au s at the trapped site * Intrinsic gettering - trapping on dislocations and SF which surround precipitates. Dislocations have compressive and tensile stress - accommodate smaller and larger atoms

37 Limits and Future Trends in Technology and Modeling; Environment Eliminate defects from wafers: particles, contaminants, clean room -> local=SMIF (standard mechanical interface Wafer cleaning in future ICs-> less chemicals (liquids, vapors), more diluted (disposal) New cleaning: Use ozone Dry and vapor phase, (Vapors, Plasmas) environment! Cluster tools Low Energy Physical Processes (sputtering) Photochemically enhanced clean Gettering -> intrinsic (less extrinsic), control O i, C s, use low T processing, use modeling tool -> point defects engineering, release, diffuse, entrap. Watch for surface roughness

38 SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ Summary of Key Ideas A three-tiered approach is used to minimize contamination in wafer processing. Particle control, wafer cleaning and gettering are some of the "nuts and bolts" of chip manufacturing. The economic success (i.e. chip yields) of companies manufacturing chips today depends on careful attention to these issues. Level 1 control - clean factories through air filtration and highly purified chemicals and gases. Level 2 control - wafer cleaning using basic chemistry to remove unwanted elements from wafer surfaces. Level 3 control - gettering to collect metal atoms in regions of the wafer far away from active devices. The bottom line is chip yield. Since "bad" die are manufactured alongside "good" die, increasing yield leads to better profitability in manufacturing chips.


Download ppt "SILICON VLSI TECHNOLOGY Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling By Plummer, Deal & Griffin © 2000 by Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ : Silicon VLSI Technology."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google