1. BS 9999 A personal perspective from a Fire Engineer

2. BS 9999 vs ADB – Swings & Roundabouts….
Exits widths:
Most (not all) cases, increased occupancies or reduced exit widths – more efficient space planning
Treatment of sprinklers:
Life safety enhancements
Increased concessions (travel distances, exit widths, compartment areas)
Treatment of voids
ADB exception
Compartment areas
Useful in assembly buildings – more logical
Management needs

3. BS 9999 vs ADB – Swings & Roundabouts….
Further education college
- 3 storeys
- Interconnecting voids
Two very different solutions

4. BS 9999 vs ADB – Swings & Roundabouts….

5. BS 9999 – typical applications:
Further education college – compartment area/exit widths
Leisure centre – compartment area/exit widths
Office refurbishments – increased occupancies
New offices – reduced exit widths

6. BS pick and mix?
Applying the travel distance and exit sizing in isolation:
Interrelations difficult to pinpoint (voids, basement stairs etc)
Essential that a thorough review of fire safety features in considered
Reduced scope for fire engineering with BS 9999?

7. BS 9999 – A personal perspective from a fire engineer
Points to consider:
Efficiency of narrower 850mm exits – need to exercise judgement?
Nightclub
4 x 850mm exits
4.5m ceiling
L2 detection system

8. BS 9999 – A personal perspective from a fire engineer
ADB:
Exits provide capacity for 330 people
Nightclub
4 x 850mm exits
4.5m ceiling
L2 detection system
110
110
110

9. BS 9999 – A personal perspective from a fire engineer
Risk profile B2?
Door widths base on minimum measures = 4.1mm/person
Reduction due to L2 detection and ceiling height = 3.3mm/person = 257 people/exit = 771 total (more than twice ADB)
Nightclub
4 x 850mm exits
4.5m ceiling
L2 detection system
257
257
257

10. BS 9999 – A personal perspective from a fire engineer
“Where premises contain provisions for the consumption of alcoholic beverages then a reduction in the travel distances of 25% might be advisable”
“where a room is crowded, the time to evacuate becomes less dependent upon the travel distances and more dependent upon queuing behaviour at the exits and so door capacity becomes the critical feature of the design”

11. BS 9999 – a missed opportunity?
Fire fighting measures:
Very similar to BS 5588 Part 5
Requirements for FF Shafts still based on purpose groups rather than risk
Sprinkler concessions similar to ADB
Conflict between Table 19 and Table 21?

12. BS 9999 – Summary A welcome addition to the engineers tool-kit
A few areas of ambiguity (keeps me in a job!)
Needs a thorough understanding to apply appropriately, and check adequacy of solutions