Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Transplantation - Immunosuppression A Case-based Approach January 20, 2009 Paul D. Greig, MD, FRCS(C) Professor of Surgery University of Toronto.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Transplantation - Immunosuppression A Case-based Approach January 20, 2009 Paul D. Greig, MD, FRCS(C) Professor of Surgery University of Toronto."— Presentation transcript:

1 Transplantation - Immunosuppression A Case-based Approach January 20, 2009
Paul D. Greig, MD, FRCS(C) Professor of Surgery University of Toronto

2 Saint Cosmas & Saint Damian perform the first transplant 280 CE

3 Sir Peter Medawar ( ) Recognized that lymphocytes were the “immunocompetent cells” that were responsible for rejection – Nobel prize, 1960 Alexis Carrel ( ) “I have started research into the procedure of vascular anastomoses in order to be able to transplant certain organs…” 1901

4 Joseph E. Murray, MD First successful organ transplant: 1954, Brigham Hospital, Boston, Mass. Kidney transplant between dizygotic twins (recipient received sub-lethal dose of total body X-radiation)

5 The Pioneers of Liver Transplantation
Sir Roy Calne Thomas E. Starzl, MD

6

7

8

9

10 Liver Transplant at the University of Toronto
Year

11 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 52 y.o. male Hepatitis C +ve cirrhosis, ascites (paracentesis q 2-3 weeks) Liver transplant conventional vascular reconstruction conventional biliary reconstruction: CBD-CBD ? Initial postoperative immunosuppression

12 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Question 1 why is immunosuppression necessary? Corollary what are the immunologic mechanisms of allograft rejection? what are the targets of the allo-immune response? what are the “steps” of this response?

13

14

15

16

17 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Question 2a what are the immunosuppression options? Corollary what points in the allo-immune response are the targets of current immunosuppressive drugs? What are the current (new) immunosuppressive drugs available? What is the mechanism of action of each of these drugs?

18 Transplantation - Immunosuppression IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS
Newer Drugs Neoral Tacrolimus Mycophenolate Mofetil Sirolimus anti- IL2R antibodies Traditional Drugs Steroids Cyclosporine A Azathioprine Anti-lymphocyte antibodies: polyclonal or monoclonal (OKT3)

19

20 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Question 2b what are the toxicities of these immuno-suppression drugs? Option balance the immunosuppressive activity with toxicity with different combinations summary of each drug:

21 Transplantation - Immunosuppression CORTICOSTEROIDS
Mechanism of action inhibition of cytokine production by APCs Toxicity infection, poor wound healing,osteoporosis, aseptic necrosis, hypertension, DM, hyperlipidemia, obesity,cushinoid facies Currently minimize dose, alternate day therapy early steroid withdrawal

22 Transplantation - Immunosuppression MICROEMULSION CYCLOSPORINE A NEORAL
Mechanism of Action inhibits calcineurin --> inhibits IL2 production Microemulsion CsA (NEORAL) improved absorption, avoid IV dosing Toxicity Nephotoxicity, hypertension Neurotoxicity (tremor, headache, direct CNS) DM, hyperlipidemia, hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia Currently 10 agent ? Optimal monitoring using C2 (peak level) not C0 (trough levels)

23 Transplantation - Immunosuppression TACROLIMUS, formerly FK506 - PROGRAF
Advantages lower incidence of acute rejection than CsA? useful for refractory or chronic rejection less hyperlipidemia, hirsutism, gingival hypertorphy than CsA Toxicity same as Cyclosporine A, possibly higher incidence More DM, Currently primary immunotherapy, esp. those at high risk for steroid resistant or refractory rejection

24 Transplantation - Immunosuppression AZATHIOPRINE
Mechanism of action antimetabolite, inhibits PRPP amidotransterase Toxicity marrow: esp. neutropenia, thrombocytopenia liver: cholestasis Currently routine “triple therapy” added to reduce calcineurin inhibitor added for rejection despite adequate calcineurin inhibitor levels

25 Transplantation - Immunosuppression MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL CELLCEPT or MYFORTIC
Advantages no nephro- or neuro-toxicity MoA more lymphocyte-specific than azathioprine reduced acute rejection Toxicity marrow, GI tract Currently primary “triple immunotherapy” add to CsA or FK monotherapy following rejection or to reduce dose for CNI toxicity

26 Transplantation - Immunosuppression RAPAMYCIN SIROLIMUS or EVEROLIMUS
Advantages No neuro-toxicity Less nephro-toxicity synergistic with CsA and with FK (despite competition for FKBP) ? effective without calcineurin inhibitor Toxicity Hyperlipidemia Impaired wound healing Currently “BLACK BOX WARNING” regarding HAT following liver transplantation

27 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Toxicities - in - Common
Infection esp. viral and fungal Malignancy all cancers with time importance of surveillance Lymphoproliferative Disease (LPD) + Epstein Bar Virus (EBV-LPD) --> monoclonal LPD --> lymphoma

28 IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Individual Toxicities
Obesity HBP Nepro Neuro DM Lipids Marrow GIT Inf’n Steroids +++ + Calcineurin Inhibitors Cyclosporin A ++ Tacrolimus TOR Inhibitor Sirolimus Antimetabolites Azathioprine Mycophenolate Antilymphocyte Ab ALG OKT3 IL2R-Ab

29 Transplantation - Immunosuppression “Standard Combinations”
Calcineurin-inhibitor based Corticosteroids Solumedrol 500 mg pre-op, then taper form 200 mg/d to 20 mg/d during 1st week Cyclosporin A (NEORAL) CsA mg/kg/d divided BID, orally OR Tacrolimus (PROGRAF) FK mg/kg/d divided BID, orally Third agent MMF (Cellcept) 2 gm/d divided BID Azathioprine 1-2 mg/kg/d

30 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Question 2c Do all patients require the same degree and type of immunosuppression? Rephrased: what are the risk factors for acute rejection? Who needs more immunosuppression, who needs less? What are the risk factors for toxicity? Any alternates without Nephro/Neuro-toxicity?

31 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Acute Rejection
Increased Risk ABO incompatibility (preformed anti- A or B antibodies) presensitized (+ve crossmatch) From previous blood transfusions or pregnancy high PRA Variable levels of preformed antibody previous immunologic graft loss (chronic rej’n) underlying autoimmune disease PSC, Autoimmune CAH younger patients Lower risk Uremia Malnourished patient older patient critically ill

32 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Early Toxicity
Increased Risk renal failure Rx: avoid CsA or FK by using antibody therapy * days, introduce low dose CN-inhibitor with MMF or Azathioprine preop coma, postop depressed LOC Rx same as above CMV -ve recipient of CMV +ve organ Rx, lower immunosuppression or antiviral prophylaxis EBV naïve recipient surveillance

33 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Early Toxicity
Options for patients at Increased Risk in general: it is the nephro- or neuro-toxicity avoid (or minimize calcuneurin (IL2) inhibition i.e. avoid cyclosporin or tacrolimus use anti-lymphocyte antibodies for days combine with MMF or Aza introduce low dose CsA or Tac ~ POD 7

34 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Anti-Lymphocyte Antibodies
Polyclonal Products: RATS, ATG, ALS cocktail of anti-bodies to antigens on activated t-cells Toxicity: Fever 2. Cross-react with platelets (thrombocytopenia) Monoclonal Antibody: OKT3 murine antibody to the CD3 receptor Toxicity: Cytokine storm 2. Anti-murine antibodies Anti-IL2R Antibodies anti-CD25 antibody to the a-chain of IL2R chimerized or humanized toxicity: fever ? Efficacy without CNI

35 IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVES BACKGROUND
What’s The Problem? Toxicity major barrier to effective immunosuppression variable spectrum of toxicities specific to each drug objective juggle the toxicities of the available agents to achieve the lowest doses necessary for each patient problem no objective measure of the net immunosuppressive effect in any one individual

36 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Toxicities - in - Common
Infection esp. viral and fungal Malignancy all cancers with time importance of surveillance Lymphoproliferative Disease (LPD) + Epstein Bar Virus (EBV-LPD) --> monoclonal LPD --> lymphoma

37 IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Individual Toxicities
Obesity HBP DM Nephro Neuro Lipids Marrow GIT Inf’n Steroids +++ + Calcineurin Inhibitors Cyclosporin A ++ Tacrolimus TOR Inhibitor Sirolimus Antimetabolites Azathioprine Mycophenolate Antilymphocyte Ab ALG OKT3 IL2R-Ab

38 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Standard Combinations
Corticosteroids Solumedrol 500 mg pre-op, then taper form 200 mg/d to 20 mg/d during 1st week Cyclosporin A (NEORAL) CsA mg/kg/d divided BID, orally OR Tacrolimus (PROGRAF) FK mg/kg/d divided BID, orally Third agent MMF (Cellcept) 2 gm/d divided BID Azathioprine 1-2 mg/kg/d Sirolimus (Rapammune)

39 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 52 y.o. male, HCV+ve, Liver transplant Steroids: methylprednisilone or prednisone 500, 100, 80, 60, 40, 20 -->7.5 mg/d by POM4 Calcineurin (IL2) inhibition Tacrolimus 5 mg bid, adjust to ng/ml POD 20: Bili: 13 --> 28, ALP 96 --> 170 AST 35 --> 125, ALT > 140 DDx?

40 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 DDx: Hepatic artery thrombosis U/S liver & Doppler, CT & arterial phase, Angiogram

41 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 DDx: Hepatic artery thrombosis U/S liver & Doppler, CT & arterial phase, Angiogram Biliary Stenosis, Leak U/S, MRCP, ERCP

42 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 DDx: Hepatic artery thrombosis U/S liver & Doppler, CT & arterial phase, Angiogram Biliary Stenosis, Leak U/S, ERCP Infection CMV --> CMV antigenemia, Liver Bx recurrent HCV --> Biopsy

43 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 DDx: Hepatic artery thrombosis U/S liver & Doppler, CT & arterial phase, Angiogram Biliary Stenosis, Leak U/S, ERCP Infection CMV --> CMV antigenemia, Liver Bx recurrent HCV --> Biopsy Acute Rejection Biopsy

44 Rejection Activity Index:
infiltrate, phlebitis, ductitis

45 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Acute Rejection
Increased Risk ABO incompatibility (preformed anti- A or B antibodies) presensitized (+ve crossmatch) - ** not with liver high PRA - ** not with liver previous immunologic graft loss (chronic rej’n) underlying autoimmune disease PSC, Autoimmune CAH Younger, well nourished patients Lower risk malnourished, older patient critically ill

46 HLA Matching Effect (1995-2001)
100 63 58 16% 50 52 47 Percent Graft Survival (log) HLA mm n t1/2 8,196 16.0 1-2 7,835 13.2 3-4 23,776 11.1 5-6 13,173 9.8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years Posttransplant Cecka, Clinical Transplants 2002 (p.10)

47 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Early Toxicity
Increased Risk renal failure Rx: avoid CsA or FK by using antibody therapy * days, introduce low dose CN-inhibitor with MMF or Azathioprine preop coma, postop depressed LOC Rx same as above CMV -ve recipient of CMV +ve organ Rx, lower immunosuppression plus antiviral prophylaxis EBV naïve recipient surveillance

48 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Risk Factors for Early Toxicity
Options for patients at Increased Risk in general: it is the nephro- or neuro-toxicity avoid (or minimize calcineurin (IL2) inhibition i.e. avoid cyclosporin or tacrolimus use anti-lymphocyte antibodies for days combine with MMF or Aza introduce low dose CsA or Tac ~ POD 7

49 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 52 y.o. male, HCV+ve, Liver transplant POD 20: Bili: 13 --> 28, ALP 96 --> 170 AST 35 --> 125, ALT > 140 Bx = Acute Rejection Grade 5-6 / 9 Treatment?

50 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Treatment of Acute Rejection
Treat Rejection Increase CNI If RAI < 4 Corticosteroids methylprednisilone 500 mg/d * 3 Prevent Recurrence depends on reason for AcR if Tac or CsA levels sub-therapeutic increase Tac or CsA if Tac or CsA levels adequate add a third agent: MMF or Rapamycin

51 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Treatment of Acute Rejection
Outcome normalization of liver biochemistry + liver Bx confirmation For high RAI Steroid - Resistant Rejection antilymphocyte anti-body therapy: Polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies RATS, ATG, ALS Monoclonal ALG OKT3

52 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Treatment of Acute Rejection
Sequelae of an episode of AcR treatment increases risks of all immunotherapy related complications viral infections CMV, EBV DM, psychosis, Renal Tx reduced graft 1/2 life Also Lung & Heart “Cumulative graft injury” Liver Increase recurrence of Hepatitis C fewer long term sequelae ? Induce tolerance

53 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
Case 1 52 y.o. male, HCV+ve, Liver transplant POD 20: Acute Rejection , Grade 5-6 / 9 Treatment: corticosteroid (2 cycles) POD 90: fever (39O), generally unwell WBC = 2.8, Liver enzymes d 25% PE: unremarkable DDX?

54 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
DDx: Bacterial Infection CXR, Urine C&S, Blood culture U/S or CT scan abdomen Treat on speculation?

55 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
DDx: Viral Infection ) Cytomegalovirus (CMV) risk in CMV +ve recipients = 25% risk in -ve recipients of +ve organ = % (should receive prophylaxis) CMV syndrome (antigenemia) CMV disease (Bx confirmation) liver (Bx), lung (BAL), brain (CT or MRI) Treatment reduce immunosuppression Gancyclovir (IV --> PO)

56 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
DDx: Viral Infection ) Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) presents as lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) lympadenopathy CT: head, chest, abdomen Biopsy graded: LPD --> monoconal B-cell lymphoma Treatment reduce (stop) immunosuppression antiviral therapy (Gancyclovir) chemotherapy for lymphoma

57 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
DDx: Fungal Infection candida, aspergillosis, cryptococcus, mucormycosis image and culture

58 Transplantation - Immunosuppression
DDx: Other Infection TB cat-scratch fever Herpes simplex

59 Transplantation - Immunosuppression Chronic Rejection
Advanced graft injury Secondary to repeated episodes of acute rejection and/or persistent low grade immunologic injury Additive to previous injury In donor Preservation/ischemia/reperfusion Liver: duct loss: “ductopenic rejection” Target = duct or small arterioles Lung: bronchiolar loss: “Brochiolitis obliterans” Cumulative injury Heart: accelerated atherosclerotic change: “graft vasculopathy” Kidney: “chronic graft nephropathy” Probably multifactorial Including donor injury, preservation injury, postop injury…

60 Transplantation - Immunosuppression TOWARDS TOLERANCE
Partial Tolerance “adaptation” allows reduction in total immunosuppression during first 3 months = microchimerism? Tolerizing Strategies objective drug-free, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness needs: stem or dendritic cell induction therapy with tolerizing antibodies continuous antigen exposure

61 Transplantation - Immunosuppression FUTURE
Multi-drug Regimens variety of “protocol” therapies increased patient-specific individualization New Drugs less toxicity or non-overlapping toxicities increased efficacy reduced chronic rejection more “patient-friendly” for improved long-term compliance


Download ppt "Transplantation - Immunosuppression A Case-based Approach January 20, 2009 Paul D. Greig, MD, FRCS(C) Professor of Surgery University of Toronto."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google