1. MapReduce How to painlessly process terabytes of data

2. MapReduce Presentation Outline What is MapReduce? Example computing environment How it works Fault Tolerance Debugging Performance

3. What is MapReduce? Restricted parallel programming model meant for large clusters  User implements Map() and Reduce()‏ Parallel computing framework  Libraries take care of EVERYTHING else Parallelization Fault Tolerance Data Distribution Load Balancing Useful model for many practical tasks

4. Map and Reduce Functions borrowed from functional programming languages (eg. Lisp)‏ Map()‏  Process a key/value pair to generate intermediate key/value pairs Reduce()‏  Merge all intermediate values associated with the same key

5. Example: Counting Words Map()‏  Input  Parses file and emits pairs eg. Reduce()‏  Sums all values for the same key and emits eg. =>

6. Example Use of MapReduce Counting words in a large set of documents map(string key, string value)‏ //key: document name //value: document contents for each word w in value EmitIntermediate(w, “1”); reduce(string key, iterator values)‏ //key: word //values: list of counts int results = 0; for each v in values result += ParseInt(v); Emit(AsString(result));

7. Google Computing Environment Typical Clusters contain 1000's of machines Dual-processor x86's running Linux with 2-4GB memory Commodity networking  Typically 100 Mbs or 1 Gbs IDE drives connected to individual machines  Distributed file system

8. How MapReduce Works User to do list: iindicate: Input/output files M: number of map tasks R: number of reduce tasks W: number of machines WWrite map and reduce functions SSubmit the job This requires no knowledge of parallel/distributed systems!!! What about everything else?

9. Data Distribution Input files are split into M pieces on distributed file system  Typically ~ 64 MB blocks Intermediate files created from map tasks are written to local disk Output files are written to distributed file system

10. Assigning Tasks Many copies of user program are started Tries to utilize data localization by running map tasks on machines with data One instance becomes the Master Master finds idle machines and assigns them tasks

11. Execution (map) ‏ Map workers read in contents of corresponding input partition Perform user-defined map computation to create intermediate pairs Periodically buffered output pairs written to local disk  Partitioned into R regions by a partitioning function

12. Partition Function Example partition function: hash(key) mod R Why do we need this? Example Scenario:  Want to do word counting on 10 documents  5 map tasks, 2 reduce tasks

13. Execution (reduce) ‏ Reduce workers iterate over ordered intermediate data  Each unique key encountered – values are passed to user's reduce function  eg. Output of user's reduce function is written to output file on global file system When all tasks have completed, master wakes up user program

15. Observations No reduce can begin until map is complete Tasks scheduled based on location of data If map worker fails any time before reduce finishes, task must be completely rerun Master must communicate locations of intermediate files MapReduce library does most of the hard work for us!

17. Fault Tolerance Workers are periodically pinged by master  No response = failed worker Master writes periodic checkpoints On errors, workers send “last gasp” UDP packet to master  Detect records that cause deterministic crashes and skips them

18. Fault Tolerance Input file blocks stored on multiple machines When computation almost done, reschedule in- progress tasks  Avoids “stragglers”

19. Debugging Offers human readable status info on http server  Users can see jobs completed, in-progress, processing rates, etc. Sequential implementation  Executed sequentially on a single machine  Allows use of gdb and other debugging tools

20. Performance Tests run on 1800 machines  4GB memory  Dual-processor # 2 GHz Xeons with Hyperthreading  Dual 160 GB IDE disks  Gigabit Ethernet per machine Run over weekend – when machines were mostly idle Benchmark: Sort  Sort 10^10 100-byte records

21. Performance NormalNo Backup Tasks200 Processes Killed

22. Conclusions Simplifies large-scale computations that fit this model Allows user to focus on the problem without worrying about details Computer architecture not very important  Portable model

23. References Jeffery Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat, MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters Josh Carter, http://multipart-mixed.com/software/mapreduce_presentation.pdf Ralf Lammel, Google's MapReduce Programming Model – Revisited http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html