1. THE FOUNDATION OF PHYSICS TOM GEHRELS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

2. THE LEADING QUESTION “WHERE DOES ALL THIS COME FROM ?” “HOW DID OUR PHYSICS ORIGINATE”

3. OVERVIEW OVERVIEW EQUATIONS: FROM PLANCK, CHANDRASEKHAR EQUATIONS: FROM PLANCK, CHANDRASEKHAR TESTED WITHIN OUR UNIVERSE TESTED WITHIN OUR UNIVERSE DISCOVERY: FINITE MASS OF OUR UNIVERSE DISCOVERY: FINITE MASS OF OUR UNIVERSE DISCOVERY: MANY UNIVERSES DISCOVERY: MANY UNIVERSES FUTURE WORK FUTURE WORK

4. THE PLANCK DOMAIN THE PLANCK DOMAIN LENGTH = (Gh/c 3 ) 0.5 LENGTH = (Gh/c 3 ) 0.5 MASS = (hc/G) 0.5 MASS = (hc/G) 0.5  UNIVERSAL MASS = (hc/G) α, IN H   UNIVERSAL MASS = (hc/G) α, IN H  UNIFIED - COSMIC - PHYSICS UNIFIED - COSMIC - PHYSICS ORIGINS ORIGINS

5. MAX PLANCK COSMOLOGICAL UNITS OF MEASUREMENT COSMOLOGICAL UNITS OF MEASUREMENT HIS AIM: COSMOS’ UNIFIED PHYSICS HIS AIM: COSMOS’ UNIFIED PHYSICS h QUANTUM, c RELATIVITY, G GRAVITY, h QUANTUM, c RELATIVITY, G GRAVITY, H ATOMIC PHYSICS H ATOMIC PHYSICS

6. MAX PLANCK’S h CONSTANT, 1899 MAX PLANCK’S h CONSTANT, 1899 …OFFERS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING UNITS FOR LENGTH, MASS, TIME AND TEMPERATURE, WHICH… MAINTAIN THEIR MEANING FOR ALL TIMES AND FOR ALL CULTURES, INCLUDING EXTRATERRESTRIAL AND NONHUMAN ONES…

7. THE COSMOS IS QUANTIZED M(α) = (hc/G) α M(α) = (hc/G) α THEORY TYPE OF OBJECT OBSERVED THEORY TYPE OF OBJECT OBSERVED α M( α ) α α M( α ) α 2.00 1.1 x 10 78 Baryonic Universe 1.998-2.008 2.00 1.1 x 10 78 Baryonic Universe 1.998-2.008 1.50 3.5 x 10 58 Early-type star 1.49-(1.53) 1.50 3.5 x 10 58 Early-type star 1.49-(1.53) 0.50 3.3 x 10 19 Planck mass 0.50 3.3 x 10 19 Planck mass 0.00 1 Proton mass 0.00 1 Proton mass

8. THERE IS A MULTIVERSE  (hc/G) α IS OPEN TO ALL VALUES OF α  ORIGIN OF OUR FINE-TUNED PHYSICS ORIGIN OF OUR FINE-TUNED PHYSICS SUPPLY PROBLEM SUPPLY PROBLEM UNIFORMITY PROBLEMS UNIFORMITY PROBLEMS

9. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MULTIVERSE QUANTIZATION HIERARCHY QUANTIZATION HIERARCHY SAME MASS, SAME PHYSICS SAME MASS, SAME PHYSICS TRIAL-AND-ERROR EVOLUTION TRIAL-AND-ERROR EVOLUTION

10. SUMMARY AND COMING NEXT EQUATIONS TABLE: PROTON, P.MASS, STAR, UNIVERSE OBSERVATIONS, NUCLEOSYNTHESIS QUANTIZATION HIERARCHY,THEIRS & OURS ………………………………………………… LEADING QUESTION: LEADING QUESTION: HOW DO NEW UNIVERSES COME FROM THE MULTIVERSE?

11. A MODEL THAT MAY IMPROVE OR REPLACE BIG-BANG, INFLATION, STRING THEORIES PRELIMINARY DRAFT TOM GEHRELS UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

12. LEADING QUESTION HOW DO NEW UNIVERSES COME FROM THE MULTIVERSE ?

13. NOT BASED ON THE EQUATIONS BUT ON UNDERSTANDING OF: 1. INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM AND OF 2. PRESENT BIG BANG THEORY

14. OVERVIEW AGING & DECAY OF OUR UNIVERSE INTER-UNIVERSAL MEDIUM NOT A BIG BANG AT t = 0 SECS BUT A PROTON BANG LATER

15. DECAY SAKHAROV - HEAVIER ELEMENTS FASTER SAKHAROV - HEAVIER ELEMENTS FASTER SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLES SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLES T < 10 K, PHOTONS, NEUTRINOS, GALAXIES, DARK MATTER AND ENERGY? DARK MATTER AND ENERGY? ISM ANALOGIES, SWEEPING, CLOUDS ISM ANALOGIES, SWEEPING, CLOUDS I U M

16. THE INTER-UNIVERSAL MEDIUM STARS AND GALAXIES AGE BY TRANSITION TO HEAVIER ELEMENTS STARS AND GALAXIES AGE BY TRANSITION TO HEAVIER ELEMENTSACCRETION AS IN ISM, BUT ON LARGER, LONGER SCALES AS IN ISM, BUT ON LARGER, LONGER SCALES

17. BIG BANG  PROTON BANG SUPPLY SUPPLY PHYSICS PHYSICS UNIFORMITY, GALAXIES UNIFORMITY, GALAXIES DEGENERATE DEGENERATE ENERGY  RECOMBINATION ENERGY  RECOMBINATION DARK MASS DARK MASS t = 0  10 -6 s, 10 18 KG/M 3, 10 13 K, 0.6 AU t = 0  10 -6 s, 10 18 KG/M 3, 10 13 K, 0.6 AU

18. FUTURE WORK FUTURE WORK MODELING AND CHECKING MODELING AND CHECKING ROLE OF DARK MATTER ROLE OF DARK MATTER

19. CONFIRMATION  DISCOVERY CONFIRMATION  DISCOVERY SIZE OF UNIVERSE, PLANCK DENSITY, 10 95 KG M -3 (hc/G) 2 H 1-2α / c 5 /hG 2 THIRD ROOT : h/cH R = 8.197 3725 x 10 -16 m OBSERVED: 6<R<10 R = 8.197 3725 x 10 -16 m OBSERVED: 6<R<10 IF OUR UNIVERSE WERE EVER AT PLANCK DENSITY, ITS SIZE WAS THAT OF THE PROTON