1. 1 Belgrade review process – Novelties Development and use of the Belgrade review tool (widening the scope of the consultation NGOs, academia, research) A first attempt in implementing the Aarhus convention requirements See: http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07 http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07

2. 2 Languages Login with your CIRCA username and password Click on the chapter title to leave comments

3. 3 Entering a chapter On-line commenting Off-line commenting

4. 4 Some advantages of online commenting Automatic translation of comments and answers (Russian English); Comments listed chronologically with Username and date; Comments immediately visible to all; Statistics generated on: countries, organisations, languages, number of comments, relevance as per Author evaluation.

5. 5 Belgrade review process – Events Two dedicated consultation meetings funded under EU TACIS activity: 1.EECCA NGOs &others 16-17 Nov; 2.Special session UNECE/WGEMA 27-29 Nov; See : http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07/eecca /tacis/tacis_06/fol179451/fol351404

6. 6

7. 7 General comments Key messages – general acceptance & suggestions for new ones (Biodiversity, waste and SCP) Issues of high relevance: CC, Energy, Transport, Air, Water, Chemicals, Waste and SCP Issues of low relevance: marine, agriculture, biodiversity Data and information issues: - further data checking Transport & Air; - additional information to be provided by participants (mainly project-based results) - case studies/good practices: many identified (to be provided )

8. 8 Comments /topics Highlighted issues/cross cutting linkages: CC vs. poverty; vs. desertification; Green investment schemes: innovative Energy vs. poverty; vs. modernization Energy: focus on effectiveness of production and use Energy: focus renewable (including future prospects) Energy: nuclear a questionable issue – attention!

9. 9 Comments /topics Highlighted issues/cross cutting linkages: -Transport vs. poverty and remittances (gap between regulation and implementation); -Transport by pipelines and possible impact of future trends; -Air quality (also indoor) and health/poverty

10. 10 Comments /topics Health – Chernobyl case – sensitive in the use of information source (WHO criticised) Linkages: Outdoor & indoor air quality and health impact Transport, leaded fuel & health impact (better reflected) Institutional aspects, lack of cooperation and coordination between gov.bodies on env.health education (OECD connection)

11. 11 Comments /topics Health impact - cross cutting aspects across various reports due for 2007 (OECD, UNEP/EEA, WHO) ESD – showing similar evolution as the env. development (need for working together and sharing responsibility) ESD: 3 main instruments: education, awareness raising (targeted to emerging issues and various social groups) and training/re-training ESD – pillar to Aarhus implementation ESD section- to be produced as a joint effort

12. 12 Comments /topics Chemicals (additional information needed) More focus on POPs than heavy metals Reflect better the situation due to military industry/ space centers/uranium deposits sites Reflect sub-regional situation of chemical industry in EECCA Soil better info needed on radioactive pollution; better linkage with other chapters/sections

13. 13 Comments /topics Biodiversity More focus on protected areas: targets, efficiency of protection measures using indicators; relationship with agriculture; funding available Focus on threatened endemic species rather than invasive species

14. 14 Comments /topics Water (additional data and info needed) More focus on drinking water (especially in rural areas), floods, mountain ecosystems; A key message should address investments needs in rural areas; Consider the national order of priority : (a) water supply, (b) water treatment, (c) sludge management; Agriculture - consequence of migration from rural to urban and need for land reforms;

15. 15 Comments /topics Waste, use of natural resources, SCP Very relevant topic; better nuance the key messages and strengthen conclusions; On waste - challenges on both policy options as well as awareness & technology & management; More on trade & environmental impacts ; Future of the NAPs on SCP???

16. 16 From consultation…to dissemination From June 2007 the Belgrade review tool will be use for dissemination of the report In English In Russian

17. 17 From June 2007 Belgrade 07