1. UNCLASSIFIED CJCSI 3170.01 Revision Update CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8 22 January 2003

2. UNCLASSIFIED 2 Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Coordinated with DoD 5000 series Authorization Bill Section 803 language/Milestone A Capabilities Based Methodology Functional Capabilities Boards Analysis done within a component, through FCB direction, or other (analytic agenda) Documents - ICD, CDD, CPD, CRD 3170 Key Elements

3. UNCLASSIFIED 3 So, What’s Different? Top Down, Born Joint Requirements Generation System Systems Requirements Bottom up, stovepiped Integrated at Department Joint Concept of Operations Joint Operating Concepts Joint Integrated Architecture Joint Capabilities National Military Strategy Joint Vision Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System

4. UNCLASSIFIED 4 Requirements Generation System MAA MNA MNS CRD (If Required) ORD MS A AOA MS B ORD Update (If Reqd) Decision Review (If Reqd) ORD Update MS C Full Rate Production Review IOC JROC DAB/ Acq Exec JROC DAB/ Acq Exec DAB/ Acq Exec DAB/ Acq Exec LRIP Determination of Mission Need Concept and Technology Development System Development and Demonstration Production and Deployment DAB/ Acq Exec

5. UNCLASSIFIED 5 Functional Area Functional Concept Integrated Arch DOTLPF Process Materiel Process Analysis of Materiel Approaches DOTMLPFDOTMLPF FCB Feedback Overarching Policy NSS/NMS/Joint Vision Joint Concept of Operations Functional Area Analysis MS A Demo Increment 1 Demo Increment 2 MS B MS C MS B MS C AoA Concept Refinement JROC DAB JROC DAB JROC DAB Technology Development CDD 1 3 2 2 3 1 - Concept Refinement Decision 2 - Critical Design Review 3 - Full Rate Production Decision IOC ICD - Initial Capabilities Document CDD - Capability Development Document CPD - Capability Production Document CPD ICD Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)

6. UNCLASSIFIED 6 Organization, analysis & prioritization of requirements within functional area Develop and update functional concept Ensure integrated architecture reflects the functional area Ensure new capabilities are conceived and developed in joint warfighting context Ensure JCIDS documents are consistent with integrated force, leverage abilities of the department, and contribute appropriately Develop and maintain prioritized list of DOTMLPF requirements Validate ACAT II and below Joint Impact proposals JROC approves which FCBs exist, functional areas, lead organization to chair each FCB FCB Responsibilities

7. UNCLASSIFIED 7 Service or Other Input to the FCB Functional Area Functional Concept Integrated Arch Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis DOTLPF Process Materiel Process Analysis of Materiel Approaches DOTMLPFDOTMLPF Alternative 1 Alternative 2 JROC Interest JROC/ DAB AoA FCB Joint Impact FCB/ Component MDA Overarching Policy NSS/NMS/Joint Vision Joint Concept of Operations ICD 1 1 - Concept Refinement Decision Gatekeeper Source Requirements Process JROC Interest Joint Impact JCPAT Review Independent Joint Integration Additional FCBs Input Source ICD/CDD/CPD Interoperability Certification CDD CPD

8. UNCLASSIFIED 8 capability Assessment Capability Roadmap capability task a task b task c 2016200420062008201020122014 capability Resource Strategy 20042006 2008201020122014 capability sys 3 SLEP sys 1 block upgrade new sys FOC sys 2 end of svc life FEEDBACK training change field new organization system 1 system 2 system 3 system 4 system 5 system 6 task a task b task c task d task etask ftask g Proposed Methodology National Military Strategy National Military Strategy Joint Vision Joint Vision Service Operating Concepts Service Operating Concepts Joint Concept of Operations Joint Concept of Operations Joint Operating Concepts Joint Operating Concepts Concepts DM Dominant Maneuver Architecture Precision Engagement Architecture Full Dimensional Protection Architecture Focused Logistics Architecture Joint Force C2 Architecture Intel, Surveillance, Recon Architecture Strategic Deterrence Architecture DM Dominant Maneuver Architecture Precision Engagement Architecture Full Dimensional Protection Architecture Focused Logistics Architecture Joint Force C2 Architecture Intel, Surveillance, Recon Architecture Strategic Deterrence Architecture Dominant Maneuver Architecture Dominant Maneuver Architecture Precision Engagement Architecture Precision Engagement Architecture Full Dimensional Protection Architecture Full Dimensional Protection Architecture Focused Logistics Architecture Focused Logistics Architecture Joint Force C2 Architecture Joint Force C2 Architecture Intel, Surveillance, Recon Architecture Intel, Surveillance, Recon Architecture Strategic Deterrence Architecture Strategic Deterrence Architecture Architectures

9. UNCLASSIFIED 9 ACQUISITION DECISION POINTS COMBAT IDENTIFICATION (CID) FY-XX I = IOCF = FOCB and C = AQ MilestonesD = Disposal POM XX - YY R = Restructure SADL BCIS ICIDS DACT FBCB2 MODE 4 IFF MODE 5 IFF Link 16 A - S S-S A - A/S - A USAUSAFUSMCUSNJOINT SERVICE: IF USN/USMC BC IF USA TBD USAF I F D NATO C PROGRAM TERMINATED BCIS F/O FCS BC I F BCIS FOLLOW-ON (LEGACY FORCES) TBD C PROGRAM TERMINATED LW BC I B C TLDHS TACP/MOD C I F TBD F D USN/USMC USAF F-16 25/30 A-10 TBD: 2017-2023 I (IF JTRS WAIVER OK) F Poss Slip Link 22 I F MCTIS A C I B CSEL I C F D F TBD I

10. UNCLASSIFIED 10 RGS versus JCIDS RGS Requirements developed bottom-up CRDs integrate JROC for ACAT I/IA (SI) Components validate and approve the rest Self-policing for coordination Talks about evolutionary acquisition JCIDS Captures joint capabilities Architectures and common concepts set the stage All proposals screened for joint applicability regardless of ACAT FCB is responsible for coordination of functional area Implements evolutionary acquisition Some similarity in document content The difference is in how you get there

11. UNCLASSIFIED 11 ICD Versus MNS MNS Talks to mission need Looks at non-materiel and materiel alternatives Developed bottom-up Good forever ICD Captures the analysis Framed by common concepts What’s the desired capability? Insufficient analysis gets help Evaluates multiple materiel approaches Recommends a materiel approach Addresses a single capability Archived at MS-B Some similarity in content The difference is in the analysis and the common joint picture

12. UNCLASSIFIED 12 ORD Versus CDD ORD Describes the materiel solution Attributes and KPPs CDD Describes the SDD effort to develop materiel solution for the increment Attributes and KPPs for the increment Describes the program to get to the complete solution Updated at prior to each Milestone B Incorporates lessons learned Some similarity in content The CDD is focused on development and demonstration effort for the increment

13. UNCLASSIFIED 13 ORD Versus CPD ORD Describes the materiel solution Attributes and KPPs May be updated for MS-C CPD Describes the SDD effort to produce materiel solution for the increment Revised production attributes and KPPs for the increment Applies to a single production increment Some similarity in content The CPD is focused on production of the increment

14. UNCLASSIFIED 14 Thresholds and Objectives Development Threshold Development Objective 1 10 A Development Threshold Development Objective 1 10 A Optimum Development Threshold Development Objective 1 10 A Optimum Post-Trades Performance Production Threshold Production Objective 2 6 A Production Performance Target

15. UNCLASSIFIED 15Schedule 14-16 January Writing team final session 21 Jan - 12 Feb O-6 Staffing (22 days) 28 Jan JRP 29 Jan JRB TBD JROC 12 - 17 Feb Comment Resolution 18 Feb O-6 Comment Conference 20 Feb - 6 Mar Flag Staffing (15 days) 7 - 14 Mar Comment Resolution 17 - 18 Mar Flag Comment Conference 28 Mar Final Signature

16. UNCLASSIFIED 16 Implementation CRDs –JROC approved still current –Annual listing of effective CRDs and CRDs approved for development MNS –No new MNS –No MNS over four two years old will support a MS-A or direct to MS-B or MS-C decision –Past MS-A, B or C no revision to ICD required ORD –No ORDs six months after signature

17. UNCLASSIFIED 17 Questions?

18. UNCLASSIFIED 18 Service RGS Documents Processed by Year

19. UNCLASSIFIED 19 Alternative 2 Portfolios Joint fire support Conventional attack execution Nuclear attack Joint targeting Joint munitions Suppression of enemy air defenses Force Application Land combat ops Air ops Littoral warfare Space ops Joint urban ops Computer network attack Nuclear operations Unconventional warfare Military deception Electronic attack Special ops Psychological ops

20. UNCLASSIFIED 20 Alternative 2 Portfolios SIGINT OSINT MASINT IMINT HUMINT Combat ID Electronic support Battlespace Awareness Communications Joint Force C2 including standing joint force headquarters Communications and computer environment Campaign planning Knowledge management Predictive analysis Threat warning Command and Control (Includes partial processing of intelligence data) J2 position

21. UNCLASSIFIED 21 Alternative 2 Portfolios Deploy / redeploy Sustain Medical Mobility Logistics C2 Logistics Consequence management Personnel and infrastructure protection OPSEC Computer network defense Non-proliferation Counter-proliferation Missile defense Electronic protection Protection

22. UNCLASSIFIED 22 Things to resolve - As of 10 Jan FCBs - A cross-Service body engaged in each functional area is key to an effective JCIDS process –A finding of DPG Study 20 Group –Confirmed by CJCSI 3170 Writing Team –Historical throughput about 150 Service documents per year (all ACATS). –About 2500 Service acquisition programs. DJ-8 direction to send draft CJCSI 3170 to O-6 coordination and complete coordination on draft DoD 5000. Staffing initiated on 21 Jan.