1. Centralizing and Automating PeopleSoft Authority Management (Security) Session #20647 March 14, 2006 Alliance 2006 Conference Nashville, Tennessee

2. 2 Your Presenters Kevin Dale – Information System Analyst −At Stanford since July 2001 – Business Analyst for Financial Aid, Student Records and Security. Lead for the Authority Manager Automation Project. Minh Nguyen – Software Architect −At Stanford since June 1997 – Lead the development of Authority Manager, version 3.0 Part of the Signet core development

3. 3 Stanford University Founded in 1891 Founded in 1891 Private university Private university 6,753 undergraduate 6,753 undergraduate 8,093 graduate 8,093 graduate 1,775 faculty 1,775 faculty 7,565 staff 7,565 staff Located 30 miles south of San Francisco and just north of Silicon Valley.

4. 4 Your Organization and Oracle Campus Solutions 8 SP1 PeopleTools 8.22.05PeopleTools 8.22.05 Enterprise Portal 8.8 SP1 PeopleTools 8.44.03PeopleTools 8.44.03 Enterprise Learning Management 8.8 SP1 PeopleTools 8.45.12PeopleTools 8.45.12 Oracle e-Business Suite 11.5.9

5. 5 Agenda Authority Manager – Signet What is Signet?What is Signet? FeaturesFeatures BenefitsBenefits ConceptsConcepts TechnologiesTechnologiesPeopleSoft Before AutomationBefore Automation Project GoalsProject Goals How it Works – Business ProcessHow it Works – Business Process DemoDemo How it Works - TechnicalHow it Works - Technical MetricsMetrics Questions and Answers

6. Signet Minh Nguyen

7. 7 What is Signet? Privilege Management System Web application Toolkit/API XML Schema Open Source Project from NMI-EDIT Consortium Based on Stanford’s Authority Manager

8. 8 NMI-EDIT Consortium Comprises Internet2 and EDUCAUSE −NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI)-Enterprise and Desktop Integration Technologies Consortium (EDIT) Funded in 2001 by NSF Middleware Initiative Researches and develops inter-institutional Identity and Access Management tools Guided by MACE – Middleware Architecture Committee for Education −Group of R&E IT architects from US, Europe, and Australia

9. 9 Features Grant/Revoke Privileges Grant-only Distributed Delegation Rules-Based Conditions Proxy Grant to Groups

10. 10 Benefits Standard user interface for users to grant privileges Consistent, simplified policy definition via role- based privileges Improved visibility, understandability, and audit ability of privileges across the enterprise Reduces latency in access privileges lifecycle events (activating/deactivating)

11. 11 Building Blocks - Concepts Function - things a person can do; what they are getting privileges for. Scope - organizational hierarchy governing distributed delegation Limits - qualifiers, constraints for a privilege. Permission - atomic units of control that map to specific access rules in systems.

12. 12 Building Blocks – Concepts (cont.) Condition Must be true to retain a privilege Provides automatic revocation of privileges Based on date, person’s status, affiliation, etc. Pre-requisite - pre-conditions that must be met to activate privileges, e.g., training

13. 13 Example By authority of the Dean grantor principal investigators grantee (group/role) who have completed training prerequisite can approve purchases function in the School of Medicine scope up to $100,000 limit until January 1, 2007 as long as a faculty member at… conditions

14. 14 Technologies Java Language Servlet Container, e.g. Tomcat Struts MVC Framework Tiles for UI Customization Hibernate for Data Access Layer

15. 15 Resources NMI-EDIT – http://www.nmi-edit.org MACE – http://middleware.internet2.edu/MACE Signet – http://middleware.internet2.edu/signet

16. PeopleSoft & Authority Manager Kevin Dale

17. 17 Before Automation Totally Manual Process Email No Tracking Potential for Incorrect Assignment Delay in Assignment No Audit / Validation Process

18. 18 Automation Benefits Prerequisites – Enforcement Assignment Expiration Acting As Auto Revocation - Identity Management Loss of Single Sign-On = Loss of PS Security

19. 19 PeopleSoft - Project Goals Assignments or changes made in authority manager update PeopleSoft directly. The process will no longer require manual intervention. Minimal changes to the Authority Manager user interface, Student Admin will no longer use limit data. Speed up the authority process. Assignments to PeopleSoft are made in near real time.

20. 20 How it works – Business Process 1.Grantor inputs Assignment 2.Authority Sends Data to PS to update Security (Application Messaging) 3.Row Level / Data Permission Security is updated 4.Application Sends Security to Portal

21. Start Demo Start Demo

22. 22 125 objects in project. 30 Records 20 Fields 2 Translate Values 9 Pages 2 Menus 8 Components 24 Record PeopleCode 2 Process Definitions 8 SQL 2 Application Engine Programs 10 Application Engine Sections 1 Message Node 1 Message Channel 1 Message Definition 2 Subscription PeopleCode 2 Application Engine PeopleCode 1 Page PeopleCode

23. 23 How it works – XML from authority  Transformed (XLST)  Application Messaging  Message Definition (STF_USER_PROFILE)  PeopleCode  Security Gets Assigned

24. 24 XML – XLST - XML XML snippet from Authority Manager XML snippet From XSLT XML snippet from PS

25. 25 Application Messaging

26. 26 Metrics Volume On average 38 (includes HR, Student and Financials) new / changes to security assigned each day Latency Events harvested every 10 minutes All updates completed within 1-2 minutes

27. End Demo End Demo

28. Questions?

29. 29 Contacts Kevin Dale Information Systems Analyst, Administrative Systems Stanford University E-mail: kdale@stanford.edu Minh Nguyen Software Architect, Administrative Systems Stanford University E-mail: mnguyen@stanford.edu

30. This presentation and all Alliance 2006 presentations are available for download from the Conference Site Presentations from previous meetings are also available