Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJennifer Barton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Modeling biomass burnings by coupling a sub-grid scale plume model with Adaptive Grid CMAQ Aika Yano Fernando Garcia-Menendez Yongtao Hu M. Talat Odman Gary Achtemeier (USDA Forest Service) D. Scott McRae (NC State) 9 th Annual CMAS Conference 11 October, 2010
2
sub-grid scale plume model: Daysmoke
3
Adaptive Grid - CMAQ
4
AG-CMAQ vs Daysmoke + Eularian + Unit in concentration - Uniform conc in grid cell + Constant data pts to calculate + Lagrangian + Unit in mass + No emission dilution - Varying data pts to be calculated per time step AGD-CMAQ Objective: combine the two models to obtain the most detailed conc. in a grid model Objective: combine the two models to obtain the most detailed conc. in a grid model
5
Adaptor CMAQ Daysmoke MM5 (WRF) Chemical Coupling Ambient concentrations Parcel/Puff/Plume concentrations Grid Particles Grid Support? Distributions Parcels mixed in grid cells Meteorology Particles/CCN Handover d = downwind distance Emissions Concentrations Meteorology How to combine Daysmoke in AG-CMAQ?
6
New CMAQ setup Inside driver Inside sciproc VDIFF CMAQ DAYSMOKE XADV Rest of CMAQ codes
7
CMAQ_DAYSMOKE: Between VDIFF and COUPLE Calculate locations of 1kg PM2.5 parcels per Daysmoke time step DAYSMOKE Convert Daysmoke emissions to concentrations Determine when and where Daysmoke results can be carried over to AG-CMAQ HANDOVER Convert parcels beyond the boundary into concentrations in Adaptive grid (for each species) update grid conc. OutConcPlus
8
Handover
9
Remain in Daysmoke Emission added to grid concentration
10
Atlanta Smoke Case Feb. 28 2007 Oconee NF (1542 acres) 5 yr old 10:00 am - 3:00 pm total 5hr Piedmont NWR (1460 acres) 1 yr old 11:00 am - 2:00 pm total 3hr
11
Atlanta Smoke Case Feb. 28 2007
12
Measurement Sites
13
CMAQ vs AGD-CMAQ
14
Model Comparison
15
Mean Normalized Error
16
Summary Inputting PB smoke emissions into grid concentrations can be varied in time and place using Handover method in AG-CMAQ coupled with Daysmoke (AGD-CMAQ). On average, AGD-CMAQ has less error from the measured concentration than CMAQ and AG-CMAQ AGD-CMAQ seems to pick up the measured concentration peaks better
17
Adaptor CMAQ Daysmoke MM5 (WRF) Chemical Coupling Ambient concentrations Parcel/Puff/Plume concentrations Grid Parcels Grid Support? Distributions Parcels mixed in grid cells Meteorology Particles/CCN Handover d = downwind distance Emissions Concentrations Meteorology Future work: changes in grid adaptation
18
Using Fourier Transform for grid adaptation
19
Thank you Questions/Comments
20
Mean Normalized Error
21
Fort McPherson
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.