1. Jim Fay and David Funk – Tracy and Gyseka
Mutual Respect
Haim Ginott – Sherri
Jim Fay and David Funk – Tracy and Gyseka
Thomas Gordon – Kristy
Alfie Kohn - Erin

2. What is the degree of teacher control in establishing rules, norms, etc?
Minimal
Students and teachers establish norms, the rules are a democratic process.
Sets clear boundaries for behaviors while acknowledging and exploring their feelings.
Natural consequences

3. What is the degree of student control that is given regarding the establishment of rules, norms, etc…?
Democratic process – Students give input
Teacher is facilitator and guide

4. Is there concern for the student’s thoughts, feelings, etc.?
Yes, the goal is to encourage students to self manage.
Positive, positive, positive
Being non-judgmental, acceptance
Active and reflective listening

5. Theoretical Basis Humanist basis
A central assumption of humanism, according to Huitt (2001), is that people act with intentionality and values. 
“In humanism, learning is student centered and personalized, and the educator’s role is that of a facilitator. Affective and cognitive needs are key, and the goal is to develop self-actualized people in a cooperative, supportive environment.”
Huitt, W. (2001). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive.

6. Children make decisions from an internal locus of control and not an external locus of control
Internal control – students learn self management in a supportive environment
Student take ownership of behavior
Students have a voice in how the class operates – setting rules, consequence etc…

7. What are the main points of their theory?
Punishment is not an effective way to train kids.
Discipline is teaching, guiding, and understanding the why of behaviors
Students can learn to be self reliant
Teachers should use active listening skills
I- messages when dealing with conflict
Focus is on behavior not on student’s sense of self
Rewards are given out carefully, focus is on genuine encouragement of specific behaviors

8. What should teachers be doing or not doing when students misbehave?
Ignore some behaviors
Find out the reason for the behavior
Change instruction
Teach new behavior
Listen
Be supportive
Private Conference
Don’t
Scold or yell
Do all the talking
Jump to conclusions
Personally criticize
Use sarcasm
Punish
Single out student if possible

9. How should teachers approach students who misbehave according to the author?
With an open mind
With understanding
Offer choices
Actively listen
Calmly
I-messages
Give students a voice in their consequences

10. Scenarios Thomas Gordon
You have students working in small groups on a project. You notice, after a while, that one of the students begins to talk in an angry way to another of his group members, stands up, and tosses papers aside.
Using Thomas Gordon’s approach I would walk the student away from the group and tell him I noticed he became increasingly frustrated. Then I would ask how the group was doing in accomplishing the task. After I listened to him I would repeat back what I heard for clarification. At this point he might need to talk more to make his point clear. We would problem solve together to find solutions for him to work in the group.
If the others in the group were part of the problem it might be wise for the whole class to revisit the class established norms for group work. This could be done before the next group work time. It would need to be timed like this so that emotions could cool down and students would have had time to process.
These actions might be affected if the student’s ethnicity is one in which students are not allowed to share in decision making with adults. In an adult centered ethnic community the student might feel unable and unpracticed in voicing an open opinion. They also might feel intimated by authority and experience discomfort sharing their thoughts and feelings. More private ethnic communities might share these same outlooks as well.
I think I would need to reassure the student that they are important. During the conversation I would try to make positive comments when possible and do my best to make the student feel supported. Also it is important for the student to recognize if they had a part to play in the breakdown of the group. If they were able to recognize their part then we could really work on that internal locus of control and teach him ways of resolving conflict in a healthy manner.

11. Answers to angry kid example:
Using my author’s theoretical approach (Love and Logic style classroom management) I would approach the angry student and say something like, “I noticed you seemed angry about something that happened in your group. Would you like to talk about it?”
If the angry student had a different cultural background than me I would need to consider whether the cultural differences were having an effect on how we were reacting to each other. I know that there are cultural differences that may cause some students to interpret things that I say differently, so I would try to be sensitive to such differences in my approach.
A teacher using the Love and Logic approach to classroom management would need to try to allow the student to have a voice in deciding what to do to mediate the problem he or she is having with their classmates. The teacher would need to wait until the student had taken some time to calm down, and then approach them, listen actively to their version of the conflict, then ask the student what they think should be done to handle the situation.

12. Sherri Florek
EDU 383A
Authors and their Theories
Author: Haim Ginott
February 26, 2011
Situation: Students are working in small groups. You notice, after a while, that one of the students begins to talk in an angry way to another of his group members, stands up, and tosses papers aside.
Using your author’s theoretical approach, how would you talk to or communicate with that student?
Using Ginott’s theory in this situation, I believe the teacher would use an “I” message and say “I hear talking in an angry voice that is disrupting the class, thank you to those students who are working together and cooperating.” With this approach the teacher would not respond to the papers being tossed aside, but would ignore it until he/she had a chance to deal with the student privately.
How might your actions be affected if the student were of a different ethnic group from you?
The teacher needs to have an understanding of the student’s cultural background. There may be different communication styles, boundaries, and methods of discipline in the home that can impact the classroom behavior, but there are still behaviors that need to be expected in the classroom for the safety of all students.
Based upon what you discovered from your author, what do you feel would need to be said to that student and what might you say?
When the teacher has the opportunity to talk to the student alone, he/she would model communication that would be appropriate to use in the situation and share skills that would help the student be able to make responsible choices in a small cooperative learning group. The teacher would give the student an equal amount of time communicating his/her thoughts and ideas for ways to make a positive change in the situation.
The teacher could say “I understand that there is something that is not working out in your group and it is making you angry. How might we be able to talk about it and come to an understanding? I expect everyone to be able to work together and be respectful to each other. I believe we can talk this out among the group members and come to an agreement of some expectations for the small group.” What do you think we can do to successfully work together and complete this assignment? “