1. Building Leadership Teams 2011-12 Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Elementary Session #4 March 27th, 2012

2. 2011-12 BLT Key Outcomes Set and communicate direction! Effectively implement PLCs with integrity and fidelity at the school Align the work of PLC teams with the School Improvement Plan Use the Plan Do Study Act cycle and quality tools to drive improvements for PLC/SIP SMART goals

3. Agenda 8:00-11:30am Building Leadership Team Self-Assessment Formative Assessments/PLCs End of Year SIP Review BLT Planning for Next Year 11:30am – 12:30pm Lunch at Double A’s 12:30 – 3:30pm Team time (Planning for the 12-13 school year)

4. Effective Teams Make Collective Commitments to Each other… -Building Leadership Team Norms Review your team BLT norms before we begin our work today!

5. Characteristics of High Performing Schools 1.Common mission, vision, values and goals. 2.Ensuring achievement for all students with systems for prevention and intervention. 3.Collaboration focused on teaching and learning. 4.Using data to guide decision-making and continuous improvement. 5.Gaining active engagement from family & community 6.Building sustainable leadership capacity.

6. How are we doing? BLT self-reflection… next steps?

7. Instructions Review the BLT Self reflection document Complete the BLT Self reflection document 1st- Each individual determines a rating Next- Once all individuals complete the rating, come to consensus on a “group” rating Capture the “consensus rating” to report out Be prepared to share your findings Select a presenter

8. Where is your PLC team in the PDSA Cycle?

9. Break: Sit by Departments

10. After Break: Sit in the Following Groups TABLEDepartments HSMathScience DVMSLanguage ArtsFACs DMSSocial StudiesTechnologyPE

11. HAVE YOU CREATED & SHARED YOUR PLC STORY BOARD?

12. PDSA Reflection Tool http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22F7AEZXJ2U

13. Share with your department group Smart Goal Improvement Theory Assessment used to collect data Conclusions Changes in instruction Student achievement results

14. Past, Present, & Future Learning by Doing, Our PLC Journey

16. Aligning/Merging our Work: CC, SI,PLC,BLT’s 1.What is it we want all students to know and be able to do? 2.How will we know our students are learning? 3.What will we do when our students are not successful? 4.What will we do when our students already know? Developing District Course/Grade level Maps Identifying Power Standards Creating “I can” statements Create Common Format Assessments Studying the Common Core Math/Language Arts Standards Developing/implementing Common Writing Assessments Collaboratively analyzing assessment data

17. Merging SI & PLC Work 1.What is it we want all students to know and be able to do? District Curriculum maps- tell what is important Power Standards/ “I can” statements Studying Common Core Standards 2.How will we know our students are learning? Developing Common Formative Assessments Collaborative Data Analysis Collaboratively Developing/Implementing Writing Assessments 3.What will we do when our students are not successful? 1.What will we do when our students already know?

18. Departments Identify Power Standards Unwrap Power Standards and translate to student friendly language Review Curriculum Maps for Power Standards and create District Course maps Create a Common Formative Assessment for future unit Collaborative data analysis Update District Course Map as appropriate based on collaborative work & assessment results Math/Language Arts CC Know the Standards Identify Gaps Identify How Gaps will be addressed Resources Instructional Suggestions PD Needed Language Arts- April 24 th Create District Course Maps linked to Common Core Standards Create Common Assessments to measure how students are achieving on the standards

19. Connecting the PDSA Process to your curriculum units (from Macro to Micro) Common Formative Assessments (Pre or Baseline) Collaborative Data Analysis Instruction based on Pre- Assessment Results Post Formative Assessment Study Results, adjust curriculum map as needed Unit with Power Standards Next Unit/New Power Standard

20. Pre-assessment Smart Technology- Clickers

21. React to: What differentiates teams in PLC’s from traditional teams is the response. In PLC’s, when students are identified as not yet reaching proficiency on the skills and concepts considered essential, there is a collective and systematic first response within the team designed to provide immediate support. These teams respond to student needs simply by looking for other teachers or staff, such as specialists, to provide the intervention students need. (Bailey & Jakicic, 2012)

22. Listen for… What does the World History PLC Team do at the beginning of the year? What are the 4 categories on the chart shown and discussed? How do the teams look at data?

24. A Balanced Assessment System Classroom Assessments Classroom Assessments Common Formative Assessments Benchmark Assessments External Examplesclickers, exit slips, discussions, quick checks Chapter or Unit exams, projects Performance activity, quiz, Aimsweb STAR Explore/Plan ISAT, PSAE Formative /Summative FormativeSummativeFormativeSummative Whose responsible Teachers Collaborative Teams TeachersTeachers/Ad min PurposeGive immediate feedback For a gradeDetermine if students have learned & how to respond To access student growth/ progress monitor Access student growth/ accountability

25. Protocol for Assessment Development Step 1: Decide What to Access Choose a future unit Identify critical content/skills from the unit that you will assess Step 2: Decide How to Access Step 3: Design the Assessment Step 4: Determine the Timeline Step 5: Write the Assessment/Determine Proficiency Step 6: Review the Assessment & Administer

26. Step 3: Design the Assessment Critical Concept/Skill KnowledgeApplicationAnalysisEvaluation Understands hypothesis 4 M/C Applies hypothesis to a given situation 2 constructed response Knows the steps of the scientific method 5 matching questions Step 7: Identify Proficiency Criteria and Decide How to Gather Data

30. Protocol for Collaborative Data Analysis Step One: Gathering the Data Step Two: Analyzing the Data Step Three: Planning the Response Step Four: Reviewing the Assessment Step Five: Next Steps

31. Sharing: How has your PLC Team captured the data? Smart Response Scantron Spreadsheet Google Doc

32. AVERAGE7.017.429.189.27

35. Collaborative Analysis Student Questions What student questions do you have based upon the data? Instructional Questions What instructional questions do you have based upon the data?

36. Collaborative Analysis: Examples Student Questions Did the same students miss all the learning targets? What is the percent of students needing additional help? Is additional whole-class instruction needed? Is additional instruction/support needed for only a few? Instructional Questions Were results better for any particular class or skill? Did all team members use the same instructional strategies? Were there any particular differences in strategies/activities that may have influenced the results?

37. Step Two: Analyzing the Data Learning TargetStudentsAction Plan Need Significant Time & Support Students Need Additional Practice Need Enrichment

38. Step Three: Planning the Response

39. Step 4: Reviewing the Assessment Review the assessment for reliability and validity Check for consistency in scoring among team members Check for inter-rater reliability

40. Step Five: Next Steps Finding time to respond Intervention Time Tier 2 Additional time scheduled within the unit

41. Post Assessment

44. Instructions Review both documents SIP Rubric SIP End of Year Review Complete the End of Year review 1st- Each individual determines a rating Next- Once all individuals complete the rating, come to consensus on a “group” rating Capture the “consensus rating” to report out Be prepared to share your findings Select a presenter

45. Please submit 1 summary evaluation from your school 1.) The 4 sessions scheduled this year were… Not Enough Just Right Too Many Comment: 2.) A ½ day of “content” from the unit office for each session was… Not Enough Time Just Right Too Much Time Comment: 3.) A ½ day of “team time” planned by the BLT was… 4.) The timing (spacing, the months selected) of the workshops was… Too Spread Out Just Right Too Close Together Comment: 5.) These were the things we really liked about this year’s Building Leadership Team workshops that should be continued into next year: Comment: 6.) These are suggested changes for next year’s Building Leadership Team workshops: Comment: 7.) Next year, these are the topics/agenda items that would be most helpful to our team (please be specific regarding content). Comment: 8)Provide any other comments that will help us meet your needs in the future:

46. To Do Between Today and Start of the Year WhatWhoDue/When BLT and all teachers By end of year Revise/update your school’s data center and balanced scorecard and get it ready for 12-13 BLTBy end of year Revise/update the School Improvement Plan for the 12- 13 school year. BLT By the start of next school year By the start of next school year, share with the entire staff to set and communicate direction:  12-13 School Improvement Plan  12-13 School balanced scorecard and measures  12-13 Revisions to PLC time at your school  12-13 Expectations for continuous improvement implementation to ensure a comprehensive “Classroom Learning Community” (8 components) BLTBy the start of next school year