1. AUTH, SGUL IPR issues 1

2. 2 2 Actions: WP2: Action 2.3. Resolve IPR issues for provided and new content WP3: Action 3.2. Resolve IPR issues for repurposed content Partners responsible: AUTH, SGUL Partners contributing: UCY, COVENTRY, ECCA, OU

3. 2 deliverables D. 2.4. mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines. (Part 1): mEducator in the context of the international legal framework on IPR. D.3.2. mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines for re-purposed content. (Part 2): mEducator in the context of Law 2121/1993 as an Open Educational Resources application. 3

4. 2.4. 4 Palma de Mallorca, 28-29 September 2009 D.2.4 & D.3.2. Timetable Deliverable 2.4.: mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines SØ = Friday, 29 January 2010 Actions and Timetable According to QA Plan Proposed Detailed Schedule Actual Dates of Delivery & Comments QA actionsQA timetable proposed dateweeks datecomments Production of outlinesSØ – 6 10-12-2009 to 15-12-2009 SØ – 6 Distribution of outlinesSØ – 6 Tuesday, 15-12-2009SØ – 6 16-12-2009 Review of outlinesSØ – 4 15-12-2009 To 18-12-2009 SØ – 5 16-12-2009 to 04-01-2010 Work on first draft s SØ – 5 to SØ – 3 18-12-2009 to Friday, 08-01-2010 SØ – 5 to SØ – 3 Distribution of first draftsSØ – 3 Friday, 08-01-2010SØ – 308-01-2010 Internal Review of first draft / review-meetingSØ – 2 Friday, 08-01-2010 To Thursday, 14-01-2010 SØ – 2 Submission of internal reviewers’ comments on first draftSØ – 2 Thursday, 14-01-2010SØ – 2 Production of final deliverableSØ – 2 Thursday, 14-01-2010 to Thursday, 21-01-2010 SØ – 2 Submission of final deliverable to internal reviewersSØ – 1 Thursday, 21-01-2010SØ – 1 Internal Review of final deliverableSØ – 1 Friday, 22-01-2010 to Tuesday, 26-01-2010 SØ – 1 SØ Submission of reviewers’ comments on final deliverableSØ – 1 Tuesday, 26-01-2010SØ Final corrections according to the reviewSØ Tuesday, 26-01-2010 to Friday, 29-01-2010 SØ Submission to project managerSØ Friday, 29-01-2009SØ

5. D.2.4. Table of contents 1/3 1.INTRODUCTION 2.BASIC NOTIONS OF COPYRIGHT 2.1.T HE S UBJECT OF C OPYRIGHT 2.2.T WO TYPES OF RIGHTS 2.3.T HE RIGHT OF REPRODUCTION AND RELATED RIGHTS 2.4.T HE RIGHTS OF PUBLIC PERFORMANCE, BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC 2.5.T RANSLATION AND ADAPTATION RIGHTS 2.6.M ORAL RIGHTS 2.7.L IMITATIONS ON RIGHTS 2.8.D URATION OF C OPYRIGHT 5

6. D.2.4. Table of contents 2/3 3.OVERVIEW OF THE EU’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON IPR 3.1.T HE D IRECTIVES ON C OPYRIGHT AND R ELATED R IGHTS AND RECENT REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS 4.THE INFORMATION SOCIETY DIRECTIVE (2001/29/EC) 4.1.H ORIZONTAL COPYRIGHT D IRECTIVE 4.2.E XPLOITATION RIGHTS 4.3.L IMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 4.4.T ECHNOLOGICAL MEASURES AND RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 4.5.S ANCTIONS AND REMEDIES 5.Copyright and the right of information 6

7. D.2.4. Table of contents 3/3 6.COPYRIGHT AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES 6.1.O RPHAN WORKS IN THE DIGITAL SPACE 6.2.W EB 2.0 AND DIGITAL RIGHTS 6.3.C OPYRIGHT AND METADATA 7.THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING MODEL FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES COPYRIGHTS AND P2P ARCHITECTURES. 7.1.DL, REPOSITORIES & SIMILAR SYSTEMS LIKE M E DUCATOR 7.2.C ODE OF E THICS 7.3.A HYBRID FORM OF A LIBRARY THAT CONSIDERS P2P APPLICATIONS AND LEVERAGES ON THE C REATIVE C OMMONS LICENSING MODEL 8.MEDUCATOR WORKFLOWS AND GUIDELINES. 9.CONCLUSIONS 10.REFERENCES 11.APPENDICES 7

8. D.3.2. Table of contents 1/3 1.INTRODUCTION 2.OPENNESS AND OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR MEDUCATOR 2.1.B RIEF HISTORY OF O PEN S OURCE S OFTWARE 2.2.OER FREEDOMS 2.3.OER AND O PENNESS INITIATIVES 2.4.OER AND OPLI 2.5.S CIENCE G ATEWAYS 2.6.O PEN C ONTENT L ICENSES 2.7.A LL R IGHTS R ESERVED V. S OME R IGHTS R ESERVED 2.8.C REATIVE C OMMONS AND OER 2.9.B RIEF HISTORY OF C REATIVE C OMMONS 2.10.T HE C REATIVE C OMMONS L ICENSE C ONDITIONS 2.11.T YPES OF C REATIVE C OMMONS LICENSES 2.12.S HARED BELIEFS OF THE OER 8

9. D.3.2. Table of contents 2/3 3.THE DEFAULT LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF LAW 2121/1993 FOR MEDUCATOR 3.1.D EFAULT C OPYRIGHT 3.2.A RTICLE 21 OF L AW 2121/1993 3.3.P RIVATE USE 3.4.T HE THREE - STEP - TEST 4.COMMERCIAL V. NON-COMMERCIAL USE 5.OTHER ISSUES REGARDING LICENSING OF CONTENT FOR MEDUCATOR 5.1.S IGNALLING THE C REATIVE C OMMONS LICENSING MODUS 5.2.S TANDARD V. C USTOMIZED LICENSING 5.3.B ARRIERS TO OER 5.4.C REATIVE C OMMONS AS THE MOST APPROPRIATE OPTION FOR M E DUCATOR 5.5.R ECOMMENDATIONS FOR M E DUCATOR AS OER REPOSITORY LEVERAGING ON THE C REATIVE C OMMONS LICENSING MODEL 9

10. D.3.2. Table of contents 3/3 6.THE MEDUCATOR AND OPEN COURSE WARE INITIATIVES 6.1.T HE MIT OCW INITIATIVE 6.2.T HE OCW C ONSORTIUM 6.3.S AKAI, MERLOT, C ONNEXIONS, AND O PEN L EARNING I NITIATIVE 6.4.JISC OER P ROGRAMME 7.MEDUCATOR WORKFLOWS AND GUIDELINES FOR REPURPOSED CONTENT 8.CONCLUSIONS 9.REFERENCES 10.APPENDICES 10

11. Attribution - by You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work — and derivative works based upon it — but only if they give credit the way you request. Share Alike - sa You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work. Non-Commercial - nc You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work — and derivative works based upon it — but for non-commercial purposes only. No Derivative Works - nd You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not derivative works based upon it. 11 License Conditions

12. The Licenses Attribution Attribution Share Alike Attribution No Derivatives Attribution Non-Commercial Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 12