Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PSC and ERCP Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D. Methodist Digestive Institute Methodist Dallas Medical Center.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PSC and ERCP Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D. Methodist Digestive Institute Methodist Dallas Medical Center."— Presentation transcript:

1 PSC and ERCP Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D. Methodist Digestive Institute Methodist Dallas Medical Center

2 PSC: Objectives Background Diagnostic options Treatment (Endoscopic) Endotherapy Complications Tissue Sampling

3 Challenging

4 Benign Biliary Strictures Postoperative stricture (OLT, biliary-enteric) Operative bile duct injury Chronic pancreatitis Papillary stenosis Radiation injury Traumatic injury Sclerosing cholangitis

5 Terminology Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis –Idiopathic but likely immune mediated Small-duct Sclerosing Cholangitis –Histologic diagnosis Overlap Syndromes – PSC features plus –Autoimmune hepatitis or Pancreatitis Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis –Obstruction, Infection, Ischemia, Toxin, Histiocytosis X, IgG4 Cholangitis

6 May progress to large-duct PSC Better long-term prognosis, longer transplant-free survival May recur after liver transplant Cholangiocarcinoma is less common unless progression to large-duct PSC

7 Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:56-63 IgG4 cholangitis and AIP-SC overlap syndrome respond to steroids

8 Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Chronic cholestatic liver disease - Idiopathic –Mean age at diagnosis =40yrs, ≈75% Male –Fatigue, jaundice, pruritus or no symptoms –+ANA (≈30%), +ASMA (≈60%) +ANCA (≈80%) Clinical diagnosis + cholangiopathy Decreased survival –Median survival after diagnosis ≈ 12 years –10 year survival ≈70%, 20 year survival ≈65% Potential sequelae –Cholangitis, Biliary cirrhosis, Malignancy

9 Best Pract & Research Clin Gastroenterol 25:741-752, 2011

10 >50% (up to 80%) have IBD (usually UC) –5% of IBD (colon disease) have PSC –Independent of disease activity 10X  risk for colon cancer (>10% lifetime) –Screening colon exam yearly at dx of PSC  risk for GB CA and HCC (2-5% lifetime) –annual U/S, CCX if lesion/polyp independent of size OR > 8mm PSC, IBD and Malignancy

11 PSC and Cholangiocarcinoma Risk of 1.5% per year after dx of PSC 30% of CCA dx within 2 years of PSC dx Nearly >150X  risk for CCA c/t general ≈ 20% lifetime risk for CCA Screening strategy not defined –CA 19-9 (>130 U/ml) ≈ 70% sensitivity, 98% specificity –Annual imaging

12 Cholangiography in PSC Stenosis alternating with dilation- “beaded” Diffuse intra- and extra-hepatic 25% Intra-hepatic only 5% Extra-hepatic only 5-15% Histologic only (Small-duct PSC) “Dominant Stricture” eventually in 20-50% –diameter < 1mm for CHD, < 1.5mm for CBD ? Concomitant cancer if long stricture

13 Liver Biopsy for PSC ? Not required if cholangiogram is abnormal Required to diagnose small-duct PSC –25% progress to large-duct PSC Consider if  transaminases and suspected PSC-AIH overlap syndrome

14 Diagnosis of PSC Chapman et al. Hepatology 2010 Jaundice ERC

15 MRCP had high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PSC (> 80% for both) MRCP may avoid risks of ERCP Possible false + MRCP in cirrhosis Possible false - MRCP in “early PSC” Radiology 2010;256:387-396

16 MRCP Pitfall (Cirrhosis)

17 ERC-Cholangiography Technique Avoid pancreatography Consider wire-guided cannulation Sphincterotomy Early radiographs with minimal contrast Adjust scope position to visualize duct

18 Diagnosis of PSC: Summary Suspect if AMA-negative cholestasis Ultrasound to rule-out obstruction MRCP helpful (if not cirrhotic) Check IgG4 (IgG4-associated cholangitis) ANCA supportive (suspect colon disease) ANA +/- liver biopsy if  transaminases ERCP: to confirm diagnosis, jaundice, e/o dominant stricture or increased CA19-9

19 Medical Management of PSC Screen for malignancy Immunizations for viral hepatitis Screen for osteopenia q 3 years Screen for varices (if e/o cirrhosis) Monitor for fat soluble vitamin deficiency Management of pruritus (similar to PBC) Refer for OLT (≈25% recurrence in 10 yrs) –Refractory cholangitis and/or ESLD

20 Therapy for Cholangitis in PSC Antibiotic therapy –Quinolone for 10-14 days –Prophylactic cyclical for recurrent cholangitis: Quinolone and/or metronidazole for 2 weeks every 2 months UDCA is not recommended Surgical Percutaneous ERCP

21 Interventional Therapy for PSC ≈ 20 - 50% develop biliary obstruction Percutaneous therapy is effective, increased morbidity c/t endoscopic therapy, required if failed endoscopic therapy fails, more common with hilar obstruction Surgical therapy (bypass, resection or OLT) –No benefit & might worsen OLT outcomes –Consider for suspected cholangiocarcinoma or if failed endoscopic or percutaneous therapy

22 Therapeutic ERCP Indications Indications Spills Spasms Stones Strictures E ndoscopic R etrieving C utting P lumbing

23 Biliary sphincterotomy Stricture dilation (dominant strictures) –Balloon dilation –Catheter dilation Stent placement (short term) Limited data suggest improved outcomes –Improved transplant-free survival –No randomized controlled trials Therapeutic ERCP for PSC Goal: Reduce alkaline phosphatase to < 1.5X UNL

24 Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:293-299 25 pts treated over 10 years Treated with stents +/- stricture dilation Stents removed or exchanged q 2-3 mo or if evidence of stent dysfunction Complicated by cholangitis in 10 (40%)

25 80% at 1yr Cumulative proportion of patients without endoscopic intervention 60% at 3yr (Mean 11 days) Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2304-2307

26 Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:1059-1066

27 171 pts with up to 20 yr f/u 96 (56%) had endotherapy Sphincterotomy Balloon Dilation q 4 wk until stricture resolved Mean 5.2 dilations (1-17) 6 (4%) developed CCA 20 (12%) underwent OLT Actuarial survival free of OLT Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:527-534

28 Therapeutic ERCP for PSC Clin Liver Dis 2010; 14:349-358

29 Therapeutic ERCP for PSC Biliary access (can be difficult) Balloon dilation preferred Short-term stent placement –Persistent stricture after dilation –Recent biliary sepsis Strictures >2cm proximal to CHD are ineffectively treated, ? Indicate need OLT Increased risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis

30 Balloon Dilation Alone

31 Balloon Dilation + Stenting

32 ERCP Complications in PSC Retrospective Mayo Clinic ERCPs in 2005 Overall 11% Higher cholangitis Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:855-860

33 Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:643-648

34 Cumulative complications per patient: PEP 4 (16%) Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:293-299

35 J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:1032-1039 >50% complications are PEP 106 patients had ERCP 11% PEP per patient

36 Laboratory (LFT, CA 19-9, IgG4) Routine imaging (US, CT) MRCP, EUS ERCPSensitivity Specificity –Brush cytology ~50% >95% –Intraductal biopsy ~60% >95% –Cholangioscopy ~80% ~80% –Probe CLE?? –Combined >80% Suspicious Strictures

37 Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:943-950 8 studies involving 828 patients with PSC Sensitivity = 68% Specificity = 70% High Cost Recommended if high pretest probability Or if standard brush cytology is negative

38 Cholangioscopy & Biliary CLE

39 Intraductal Biopsies

40 Suspect Cholangiocarcinoma Mass on surveillance imaging Increased CA 19-9 (> 130 U/mL) –80% sensitivity, 98% specificity Rapid recurrent cholestasis after endotherapy (< 12 weeks) Long-segment stricture Atypical cytology

41 Evaluation for Suspected CCA Chapman et al. Hepatology 2010 ? Laparotomy q 6 – 12 weeks

42 New Method to Diagnose CCA? Acrylonitrile, Methyl hexane, and Benzene Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:943-949

43 Cholangiocarcinoma

44 Cholangiocarcinoma with PSC Long and/or early recurrent strictures Poor prognosis: < 20% 3 yr survival even after surgical resection Consider OLT protocol (< 3cm mass) Preoperative drainage is controversial Frequently unresectable (>80%) Confirmation of cancer is difficult (~50%) Palliation is goal –Stenting +/- Ablation

45 Palliative Stenting for Hilar CCA Define lesion to target drainage Only 25-50% of liver needs drainage Guidewire access of desired duct Opacify only ducts that are to be drained Single plastic stent preoperatively Bilateral drainage for Type II (long-term) Uncovered SEMS preferable (inoperable) Percutaneous and/or Endoscopic

46 Bilateral Uncovered SEMS

47 Palliative Ablation of CCA

48 PSC Summary Varied clinical presentations Lack data Technically challenging Complications are common Limited treatment options Not All Bad News


Download ppt "PSC and ERCP Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D. Methodist Digestive Institute Methodist Dallas Medical Center."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google