Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars."— Presentation transcript:

1 A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars

2 Contents The coupling between cumulus clouds and the mixed layer Mass flux feedbacks The dual mass flux scheme The eddy diffusivity mass flux (EDMF) approach An extension for shallow cumulus Introducing more complexity New parameterizations SCM evaluation Idealized prototype cases Daily evaluation against ARM and CloudNet data Interactive with the larger scale dynamics

3 II. Retaining the area fraction in the cumulus mass flux Neggers,Siebesma, Lenderink and Holtslag, 2004: “An Evaluation of Mass Flux Closures for Diurnal Cycles of Shallow Cumulus”. MWR, 132, 2525-2538. I. Using a constant pre-factor Grant, 2001: “Cloud-base fluxes in the cumulus- capped boundary layer”. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 127, 407-422. Closures staying close to thís structure: Cumulus mass flux at cloud base Definition Bretherton, McCaa and Grenier, 2004: “A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Part I: Description and 1D results”. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 864-882.

4 A *SIMPLE* equilibrium model including a mass flux closure with flexible fraction Neggers, Stevens and Neelin, 2006: “A Simple Equilibrium Model for Shallow Cumulus Topped Mixed Layers”. Special Issue of the Theor. Comp. Fluid-Dynamics, in press, September 2006. humidity heat mass

5 Variance scaling at mixed layer top Neggers, Stevens and Neelin, 2006: “Variance Scaling in Shallow Cumulus Topped Mixed Layers”. Submitted to QJRMS, August 2006.

6 Equilibrium model solution BOMEX forcings and boundary conditions

7 Feedbacks between cumulus mass flux and humidity at mixed-layer top

8 Equilibrium model solution on ERA40 forcings and boundary conditions 50 years of ship based synops observations (Norris, J.Clim. 1998)

9 The dual mass flux scheme – main EDMF upgrades Moist updrafts Flexible area partitioning a up Dry updrafts K diffusion a 1 up a 2 up h z0z0 1 - a up I. Multiple updrafts II. Flexible updraft area fractions – LCL coupling VII. Extension of EDMF into statistical cloud modelling (a bimodal PDF) III. Updraft initialization Eddy diffusivity - mass flux (EDMF) approach IV. Updraft budgets V. Mass transport VI. Diffusion – an entrainment efficiency closure for cumulus

10 Flexible updraft area fractions facilitate representation of gradual regime transitions E LCL h  h EE M2M2 M1M1 Stratocumulus Transition Shallow cumulus Dry convection M1M1 M2M2 a2a2 a1a1 Moist and dry updrafts can coexist at any time I. Multiple updrafts with flexible area fractions

11 II. Closure of the flexible updraft area fractions Explicit representation of the coupling between cumulus updrafts and mixed-layer III. Vertical integration of updraft budgets then reconstructs the joint-PDF I. First guess of cloud core fraction at cloud base, using local variance scaling II. These fractions are subsequently used in surface initialization of updrafts Knowledge of how many updrafts manage to reach LFC is `back-stitched` into the partitioning and initialization of the updrafts

12 Variance scaling at mixed layer top This gives an implicit solution for the area fraction that carries mass flux: Neggers, Stevens and Neelin, 2006: “Variance Scaling in Shallow Cumulus Topped Mixed Layers”. Submitted to QJRMS, August 2006. shape parameter of Beta function

13

14 SCM evaluation I. For idealized prototype cases (LES) II. Daily evaluation against ARM and CloudNet data III. Interactive with the large scale dynamics

15 SCM results for prototype cases q t and q s ll cloud fraction condensate

16 marine steady state shallow cumulus RICO BOMEX – interactive radiation

17 ARM SGP transient continental shallow cumulus 21 June 1997 DualM cy30r1

18 DualM 2 [hr] cy30r1

19 Developing suppressed cumulus… the mass flux valve mechanism at work Moist updraft mass flux [m/s]

20 Daily evaluation against ARM and CloudNet data Setup: - initialize with ECMWF analysis state at midnight (local time) - 2 day time integration - relaxation towards forecast state (on a 6 hour timescale) - LS advective forcings are also applied At multiple sites around the world where relevant observational data is available

21 cy30r1DualM Chilbolton June 7, 2006 A diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus Results

22 Cabauw 24 July 2006 Shallow cumulus DualMcy30r1 DualM A too fast hydrological cycle

23 ARM SGP transient continental shallow and deep cumulus July 1999 comparison to ARSCL (radar,lidar)

24 Preliminary IFS results Shallow cu mass flux [m s -1 ] Climate run

25 Summary An extension for EDMF is formulated that allows representation of shallow cumulus convection Key component is the explicit representation of the coupling of shallow cumulus clouds to the mixed layer This is done through flexible mass flux area fractions, which introduces cloud base valve-mechanisms The DualM scheme brings significant improvements for shallow cumulus concerning i) mixed layer stability ii) structure of mean, turbulent and cloudy state iii) mixed layer depth and 2m humidity Further evaluation against ARM and CloudNet data illustrates that these results are representative of nature and robust for different large-scale scenarios. Outlook: Implementation and testing in IFS Implementation completed Evaluation in full progress


Download ppt "A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google