1. 1

2. The Humanistic Perspective  Abraham Maslow’s Self- Actualizing Person  Carl Roger’s Person-Centered Perspective  An Assessment of the Self  An Evaluation of the Humanistic Perspective 2

3. By the 1960s, psychologists became discontent with Freud’s negativity and the mechanistic psychology of the behaviorists. 3 Abraham Maslow (1908-1970) Carl Rogers (1902-1987) http://www.ship.edu

4. Maslow proposed that we as individuals are motivated by a hierarchy of needs. Beginning with physiological needs, we try to reach the state of self- actualization—fulfilling our potential. 4 http://www.ship.edu Ted Polumbaum/ Time Pix/ Getty Images

5. 5

6. Carl Rogers also believed in an individual's self-actualization tendencies. He said that Unconditional Positive Regard is an attitude of acceptance of others despite their failings. 6 Michael Rougier/ Life Magazine © Time Warner, Inc.

7. All of our thoughts and feelings about ourselves, in an answer to the question, “Who am I?” refers to Self-Concept. 7 In an effort to assess personality, Rogers asked people to describe themselves as they would like to be (ideal) and as they actually are (real). If the two descriptions were close the individual had a positive self-concept.

8. The Trait Perspective  Exploring Traits  Assessing Traits  Describing The Big Five Factors  Evaluating the Trait Perspective 8

9. An individual’s unique constellation of durable dispositions and consistent ways of behaving (traits) constitutes his or her personality. Examples of Traits Honest Dependable Moody Impulsive 9 Allport & Odbert (1936), identified 18,000 words representing traits. personalbrandingblog.com afortmadeofbooks.blogspot.com

10. 10

11. Personality types, assessed by measures like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, consist of a number of traits. For example, a feeling type personality is sympathetic, appreciative, and tactful. 11 Sympathetic Appreciative Tactful Feeling Type Personality usatoday.com

12. Factor analysis is a statistical approach used to describe and relate personality traits. Cattell used this approach to develop a 16 Personality Factor (16PF) inventory. 12 Raymond Cattell (1905-1998) psychology.about.com

13. 13 Cattell found that large groups of traits could be reduced down to 16 core personality traits based on statistical correlations. Impulsive Excitement Impatient Irritable Boisterous Basic trait Superficial traits

14. 14 psychometric-success.com

15. Hans and Sybil Eysenck suggested that personality could be reduced down to two polar dimensions, extraversion- introversion and emotional stability- instability. 15

16. Personality inventories are questionnaires (often with true-false or agree-disagree items) designed to gauge a wide range of feelings and behaviors assessing several traits at once. 16 susanvogt.net globalarchitectsguide.com

17. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is the most widely researched and clinically used of all personality tests. It was originally developed to identify emotional disorders. 17 The MMPI was developed by empirically testing a pool of items and then selecting those that discriminated between diagnostic groups. psychcorp.pearsonassessments.com

18. 18

19. Today’s trait researchers believe that Eysencks’ personality dimensions are too narrow and Cattell’s 16PF too large. So, a middle range (five factors) of traits does a better job of assessment. Conscientiousness Agreeableness Neuroticism Openness Extraversion 19 indigenousboats.blogspot.com CANOECANOE

20. 20 http://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=QTqGJylt HME

21. The Social-Cognitive Perspective  Reciprocal Influences  Personal Control  Internal Versus External Locus of Control  Learned Helplessness Versus Personal Control 21

22. 22

23. 23 Yes. Conscientious people are morning type and extraverted are evening type. 4. Can they predict other personal attributes? These traits are common across cultures. 3. How about other cultures? Fifty percent or so for each trait. 2. How heritable are they? Quite stable in adulthood. However, they change over development. 1. How stable are these traits?

24. 24

25. The Person-Situation Controversy Walter Mischel (1968, 1984, 2004) points out that traits may be enduring, but the resulting behavior in various situations is different. Therefore, traits are not good predictors of behavior. 25 websitemanagementcenter.comusp.org

26. Trait theorists argue that behaviors from a situation may be different, but average behavior remains the same. Therefore, traits matter. 26

27. Traits are socially significant and influence our health, thinking, and performance (Gosling et al., 2000). 27 Samuel Gosling homepage.psy.utexas.edu

28. Expressive styles in speaking and gestures demonstrate trait consistency. 28 Observers are able to judge people’s behavior and feelings in as little as 30 seconds and in one particular case as little as 2 seconds. comicscube.com

29. The Social-Cognitive Perspective  Evaluating Optimism Versus Pessimism  Assessing Behavior in Situations  Evaluating the Social-Cognitive Perspective 29

30. Bandura (1986, 2001, 2005) believes that personality is the result of an interaction that takes place between a person and their social context. 30 Albert Bandura learningandtheadolescentmind.orgall-about-psychology.com

31. Bandura called the process of interacting with our environment reciprocal determinism. 31 The three factors, behavior, cognition, and environment, are interlocking determinants of each other. Stephen Wade/ Allsport/ Getty Images

32. Specific ways in which individuals and environments interact 32 How we view and treat people influences how they treat us. Our personalities shape situations. Anxious people react to situations differently than calm people. Our personalities shape how we react to events. The school you attend and the music you listen to are partly based on your dispositions. Different people choose different environments.

33. Behavior emerges from an interplay of external and internal influences. 33

34. External locus of control refers to the perception that chance or outside forces beyond our personal control determine our fate. 34 Internal locus of control refers to the perception that we can control our own fate. Social-cognitive psychologists emphasize our sense of personal control, whether we control the environment or the environment controls us.

35. When unable to avoid repeated adverse events an animal or human learns helplessness. Loss of control can lead to a feeling of hopelessness and depression. 35

36.  Another common example of learned helplessness can be observed in school classrooms. Individual students are free to get up from their seats at any time to use the restroom, or even to leave the building. However, most students quickly learn that such actions result in swift and definitive punishment, so they eventually learn to remain in place during class. This form of learned helplessness helps instructors to maintain control over a large group of students, and students do eventually regain a sense of control over their own circumstances. 36

37. An optimistic or pessimistic attributional style is your way of explaining positive or negative events. 37 Positive psychology aims to discover and promote conditions that enable individuals and communities to thrive.

38. 38

39. Social-cognitive psychologists observe people in realistic and simulated situations because they find that it is the best way to predict the behavior of others in similar situations. 39 statemaster.com

40. Critics say that social- cognitive psychologists pay a lot of attention to the situation and pay less attention to the individual, his unconscious mind, his emotions, and his genetics. 40 weidnerappsych.wikispaces.com

41. Positive psychology, such as humanistic psychology, attempts to foster human fulfillment. Positive psychology, in addition, seeks positive subjective well-being, positive character, and positive social group s. 41 Martin Seligman Courtesy of Martin E.P. Seligman, PhD Director, Positive Psychology Center/ University of Pennsylvania

42. Exploring the Self  Benefits of Self-Esteem  Culture and Self-Esteem  Self-Serving Bias 42

43. Research on the self has a long history because the self organizes thinking, feelings, and actions and is a critical part of our personality. 43 1.Research focuses on the different selves we possess. Some we dream and others we dread. 2.Research studies how we overestimate our concern that others evaluate our appearance, performance, and blunders (spotlight effect). 3.Research studies the self-reference effect in recall.

44.  Spotlight Effect  Self reference effect – if you can make a personal connection it is more likely that you will remember something 44

45. Maslow and Rogers argued that a successful life results from a healthy self- image (self-esteem). The following are two reasons why low self-esteem results in personal problems. 45 1.When self-esteem is deflated, we view ourselves and others critically. 2.Low self-esteem reflects reality, our failure in meeting challenges, or surmounting difficulties.

46. People maintain their self-esteem even with a low status by valuing things they achieve and comparing themselves to people with similar positions. 46

47. We accept responsibility for good deeds and successes more than for bad deeds and failures. (We perceive ourselves favorably.) Defensive self-esteem is fragile and egotistic whereas secure self-esteem is less fragile and less dependent on external evaluation. 47