Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

N. Pinel# 1/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes,

Published byCurtis Long Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "N. Pinel# 1/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes,"— Presentation transcript:

1 N. Pinel# 1/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes, France *E-mail: nicolas.pinel@univ-nantes.fr Modeling of radar scattering from oil films air oil sea

2 N. Pinel# 2/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Introduction: Context General context of the study: Remote sensing of oil slicks on sea surfaces Better oil slick detection (& characterization and quantization)‏  More effective direction of oil spill countermeasures Modeling of the EM scattering from oil slicks on sea surfaces  Integration in imagery simulators EM scattering → Normalized Radar Cross Section (NRCS)‏ NRCS  –one single interface → air/sea interface: relatively well-known –two interfaces → air/oil and oil/sea interfaces: research in progress scattered power incident power air oil sea

3 N. Pinel# 3/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Introduction: Purpose Different possible approaches: rigorousasymptotic + ‘exact’ + fast - extensive computing time- restricted domain of validity - extensive memory space cf. oil slick detection  Statistical description of studied natural surfaces (hydrodynamic modeling)‏ 1. GOA (Geometric Optics Approx.) + intuitive approach (Thin Layer)‏ 2. SSA-1 (Small Slope Approximation) + intuitive approach (Thin Layer)‏ 3. etc. MoM accelerated by PILE+FB+SA [Déchamps et al., IEEE TAP, 2007]

4 N. Pinel# 4/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009Outline I.Introduction II.Hydrodynamic modeling (surfaces)‏ 1.Natural interfaces: Statistical description 2.Case of clean and contaminated sea surfaces 3.Spectrum of clean and contaminated surfaces III.NRCS of clean and contaminated seas IV.Conclusion & Future work

5 N. Pinel# 5/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 II.2. Case of clean and contaminated sea surfaces Gravity waves: - Large roughness  h,l - Long correlation L c,l Capillary waves: - Small roughness  h,s - Short correlation L c,s Several roughness scales  h,l  h,s L c,s L c,l Clean sea → Qualitative description: Gravity and capillary waves: Sea surface air sea

6 N. Pinel# 6/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 II.2. Case of clean and contaminated sea surfaces Gravity waves: - Large roughness  h,l - Long correlation L c,l Capillary waves: - Smaller roughness  h,s - Short correlation L c,s  h,l  h,s L c,l L c,s Contaminated sea → Qualitative description: Damping of capillary waves of both surfaces (air/oil and oil/sea)‏ Yet damping dependent on various parameters (hydrodynamics)‏ air oil slick film sea H

7 N. Pinel# 7/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Height spectrum S(k =2  /x d,  ) → Modeling: –Clean sea surface: Elfouhaily et al. surface spectrum model [Elfouhaily et al., JGR, 1997] : Semi-empirical model Consistent with Cox & Munk experimental model [Cox and Munk, JOSA, 1954] → RMS slope  s –Contaminated sea (air/oil and oil/sea surfaces): few results: Lombardini et al. damping model [1] ( Marangoni damping coefficient ): Independent of the oil film thickness H Simple to use: 2 hydrodynamic parameters (oil)‏ Jenkins et al. damping model [2]: Dependent on the oil film thickness H Harder to use: 8 hydrodynamic parameters (oil)‏... II.3. Spectrum of clean and contaminated surfaces [1]: [Lombardini et al., JAOT, 1989] [2]: [Jenkins and Jacobs, PF, 1997]

8 N. Pinel# 8/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Lombardini et al. spectrum [1,3]: Independent of the oil film thickness H: Parameters relative to the oil type: -  D (characteristic pulsation) - E 0 (elasticity modulus) Gravity waves: Weak damping Capillary waves: Significant damping [1]: [Lombardini et al., JAOT, 1989] [3]: [Pinel et al., TGRS, 2008] k =2  /x d k² S(k)‏ In agreement with experimental results: [Ermakov, BIS Symposium, 2008] [Sergievsakaya and Ermakov, BIS Symposium, 2008] [Cox and Munk, JOSA, 1954] Clean sea surface Surface wavenumber (rad/m)‏ Slope spectrum isotropic part (dB)‏ II.3. Spectrum of clean and contaminated surfaces

9 N. Pinel# 9/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 RMS slopes  s : Comparison with experiments [4] –Cox & Munk model [4]: experiments conducted for H~0.02mm –Lombardini et al. model II.3. Spectrum of clean and contaminated surfaces [4]: [Cox and Munk, JOSA, 1954] Cox & Munk model vs. Lombardini et al. model: Similar qualitative and quantitative results Oil → significant damping of slopes

10 N. Pinel# 10/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009Outline I.Introduction II.Hydrodynamic modeling (surfaces) III.NRCS of clean and contaminated seas 1.Contaminated sea: Thin film of identical parallel interfaces 2.Numerical results: Validation of the thin-film approach 3.Thin-film approach: Validity domain study IV.Conclusion & Future work

11 N. Pinel# 11/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 At radar frequencies: Values of relative permittivities (  r sea,  r oil ): –Sea relative permittivity  r sea : relatively well-known –Oil relative permittivity  r oil : only a few results of the literature, but… at radar frequencies f:  r oil only weakly varying with f, as well as with T  OK for EM modeling / Pb. for oil type characterization (→ optical frequencies)‏ Homogeneous oil slicks (not emulsions): Applicable to wind speeds u 10 <~ 8-10m/s Use of the Lombardini et al. damping model: Surfaces assumed to be identical and parallel: air sea oil III.1. Contaminated sea: Thin film of identical parallel interfaces

12 N. Pinel# 12/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Use of the height spectrum S(k) for an EM model: Comparison between a rigorous method [5] (MoM+PILE+FB+SA) and an asymptotic method using an intuitive approach III.1. Contaminated sea: Thin film of identical parallel interfaces [5]: [Déchamps et al., IEEE TAP, 2007] Oil films: 2 identical and parallel surfaces + Low to moderate thicknesses + Damping of capillary waves Application of the thin-layer (“TL”) approach to an asymptotic model: GOA-TL, then SSA1-TL,... oil sea Locally flat parallel interfaces (← capillary wave damping)‏: From a double interface problem to a single interface problem: , with

13 N. Pinel# 13/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Simulation parameters: –Radar frequency f: –Wind speed (at 10 meters above the surface) u 10 : –Incidence angle  i : –Oil film (  D = 6 rad/s, E 0 = 9 mN/m) of thickness H: –Monte-Carlo process (PILE+FB): N = 50 realizations: III.2. Numerical results: Validation of the thin-layer approach  i = {0; -20} deg. H = {10; 1} mm u 10 = 5 m/s (Beaufort scale 3–4: light breeze – gentle breeze)‏ Surface length: L = 250 0 Sampling step:  x = /10  r sea = 70 + 41j  r oil = 2.25 + 0.01j f = 1 GHz  ( 0 = 30 cm)‏

14 N. Pinel# 14/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Oil film thickness H=10mm – rigorous (PILE+FB) vs. GOA III.2. Numerical results: Validation of the thin-layer approach Good agreement with reference method around the specular direction Sea (PILE+FB)‏ Sea (GOA)‏ Oil (PILE+FB)‏ Oil (GOA)‏ Oil-on-Sea (PILE+FB)‏ Oil-on-Sea (GOA-TL)‏

15 N. Pinel# 15/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Oil film thickness H=10mm – rigorous (PILE+FB) vs. SSA1 III.2. Numerical results: Validation of the thin-layer approach Very good agreement with reference method for all scattering angles Sea (PILE+FB)‏ oooSea (SSA1)‏ Oil (PILE+FB)‏ xxx Oil (SSA1)‏ Oil-on-Sea (PILE+FB)‏ +++ Oil-on-Sea (SSA1-TL)‏

16 N. Pinel# 16/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Oil film thickness H=1mm – rigorous (PILE+FB) vs. SSA1 III.2. Numerical results: Validation of the thin-layer approach Very good agreement with reference method for all scattering angles Sea (PILE+FB)‏ oooSea (SSA1)‏ Oil (PILE+FB)‏ xxx Oil (SSA1)‏ Oil-on-Sea (PILE+FB)‏ +++ Oil-on-Sea (SSA1-TL)‏

17 N. Pinel# 17/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.2. Numerical results: Validation of the thin-layer approach [Pinel et al., TGRS, 02/2008] Very good agreement with reference method for all scattering angles Sea (PILE+FB)‏ oooSea (SSA1)‏ Oil (PILE+FB)‏ xxx Oil (SSA1)‏ Oil-on-Sea (PILE+FB)‏ +++ Oil-on-Sea (SSA1-TL)‏ Oil film thickness H=1mm – rigorous (PILE+FB) vs. SSA1;  i =-20deg.

18 N. Pinel# 18/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Simulation parameters (H polarization): –Radar frequency f: –Wind speed (at 10 meters above the surface) u 10 : –Incidence angle  i : –Oil film (  D = 10 rad/s, E 0 = 2 mN/m) of thickness H: –Monte-Carlo process (PILE+FB+SA): N = 70 realizations: III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study  r sea = 76 + 70j  r oil = 2.25 + 0.01j f = 1 GHz  ( 0 = 30 cm)‏  i = {0; -20; -40; -60} deg. H = {15} mm  H  { oil /13} u 10 = 6 m/s (Beaufort scale 4: gentle breeze)‏ Surface length: L = 137 0 Sampling step:  x = /10

19 N. Pinel# 19/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study  i = 0°  i = -20°  i = -40°  i = -60°

20 N. Pinel# 20/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Simulation parameters (H polarization): –Radar frequency f: –Wind speed (at 10 meters above the surface) u 10 : –Incidence angle  i : –Oil film (  D = 10 rad/s, E 0 = 2 mN/m) of thickness H: –Monte-Carlo process (PILE+FB+SA): N = 70 realizations: III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study  r sea = 76 + 70j  r oil = 2.25 + 0.01j f = 1 GHz  ( 0 = 30 cm)‏  i = {-60} deg. H = {3; 15; 60; 120} mm  H  { oil /67; oil /13; oil /3; oil /1.7} u 10 = 6 m/s (Beaufort scale 4: gentle breeze)‏ Surface length: L = 137 0 Sampling step:  x = /10

21 N. Pinel# 21/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

22 N. Pinel# 22/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009Outline I.Introduction II.Hydrodynamic modeling (surfaces) III.NRCS of clean and contaminated seas IV.Conclusion & Future work

23 N. Pinel# 23/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Conclusions & Future work Hydrodynamic modeling → Surfaces statistical description: Use of a simple damping model (Lombardini et al.)‏ Surfaces of the contaminated sea assumed to be identical and parallel Electromagnetic modeling: Simple intuitive approach (→ Fabry-Pérot interferometer)‏ Radar NRCS: Application of this approach → GOA, SSA1; MoM Validation by comparison with a reference numerical method [Déchamps et al., JOSAA, 2006] Oil slick detection possible (characterization and quantization: hard)‏ Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study Future work: More investigations of the thin-layer approach validity domain Extension of the method to a 3D problem Use of a more physical damping model for oil films

24 N. Pinel# 24/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes, France *E-mail: nicolas.pinel@univ-nantes.fr Modeling of radar scattering from oil films air oil sea

25 N. Pinel# 25/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 II.1. Natural interfaces: Statistical description generally Gaussian  12 z x Gaussian 00 Height distribution (PDF): p h (  )‏ Height spectrum: S(k =2  /x d,  )‏ 6h6h p h (  )‏  00 6h6h x2x2 xdxd LcLc M2M2 M1M1 x1x1 Sea: much more complex… W(x d )‏ xdxd x1x1 LcLc  h 2 /e h2h2 z =  (x)‏ 2 main description tools:

26 N. Pinel# 26/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Jenkins and Jacobs [4,5]: dependent on layer mean thickness H: III. Case of sea and oil slick surfaces Stronger damping for Lombardini et al. model [4]: [Jenkins and Jacobs, Physics Fluids, 1997] [5]: [Pinel et al., TGRS, to be published, 03/2008] Parameters relative to oil type: 8 parameters (fluid mechanics)‏  D = 11 rad/s, E 0 = 25 mN/m Identical Gravity waves: Weak damping Capillarity waves: Strong damping

27 N. Pinel# 27/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Other statistical description tools: –Slope distribution p s (  )‏ –Autocorrelation function W(x d ) ( =FT -1 of surface height spectrum S(k,  ) )‏ –Slope spectrum k² S(k,  )‏ –etc. (other derivatives of height spectrum)‏ Different types of distributions: -Simple distributions: Gaussian, etc. -Natural interfaces  more complex descriptions in general: Clean / Contaminated sea surface → Statistical description:  Height distribution function p h (  ): ≈ Gaussian  Height spectrum: → much more complex… II.1. Natural interfaces: Statistical description

28 N. Pinel# 28/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Sea covered in oil → Choice for height spectrum S(k): Lombardini et al. model: Independent of H Representation of air/oil and oil/sea surface heights and slopes: II.3. Spectrum of clean and contaminated surfaces Confirmation of damping of small-scale height parts of S(k)‏ Significant damping of slopes k² S(k)‏ Clean sea surface  D = 16 rad/s, E 0 = 1 mN/m  D = 10 rad/s, E 0 = 2 mN/m  D = 1 rad/s, E 0 = 4 mN/m

29 N. Pinel# 29/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

30 N. Pinel# 30/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

31 N. Pinel# 31/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

32 N. Pinel# 32/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

33 N. Pinel# 33/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

34 N. Pinel# 34/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study V POLARIZATION

35 N. Pinel# 35/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

36 N. Pinel# 36/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

37 N. Pinel# 37/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

38 N. Pinel# 38/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

39 N. Pinel# 39/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 III.3. Thin-layer approach: Validity domain study H = 15mmH = 120mm H = 60mmH = 3 mm

Download ppt "N. Pinel# 1/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes,"

Similar presentations

OUTLINE Motivation Modeling Simulation Experiments Conclusions.

OUTLINE Motivation Modeling Simulation Experiments Conclusions.
Scattering from Hydrometeors: Clouds, Snow, Rain

Scattering from Hydrometeors: Clouds, Snow, Rain
©DCNS 2007 - all rights reserved / tous droits réservés Scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces at very low grazing angles. Ph. SPIGA,

©DCNS all rights reserved / tous droits réservés Scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces at very low grazing angles. Ph. SPIGA,
CONICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES DIFFRACTION FROM SASTRUGI TYPE SURFACES OF LAYERED SNOW DUNES ON GREENLAND ICE SHEETS IN PASSIVE MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING.

CONICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES DIFFRACTION FROM SASTRUGI TYPE SURFACES OF LAYERED SNOW DUNES ON GREENLAND ICE SHEETS IN PASSIVE MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING.
Optical Modeling of a-Si:H Thin Film Solar Cells with Rough Interfaces Speaker ： Hsiao-Wei Liu 08/18/2010 Wed.

Optical Modeling of a-Si:H Thin Film Solar Cells with Rough Interfaces Speaker ： Hsiao-Wei Liu 08/18/2010 Wed.
Validation of radiometric models and simulated KaRIn/SWOT data based on ground and airborne acquisitions Page de titre, mentionner contributions Altamira.

Validation of radiometric models and simulated KaRIn/SWOT data based on ground and airborne acquisitions Page de titre, mentionner contributions Altamira.
Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.

Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
By Neil Kruger Supervisor: Prof. KD Palmer University of Stellenbosch

By Neil Kruger Supervisor: Prof. KD Palmer University of Stellenbosch
Analyse de spectres Doppler de la surface de la mer en bande L G. Soriano*, M. Joelson**, P. Forget #, M. Saillard # * Institut Fresnel, UMR CNRS-Université.

Analyse de spectres Doppler de la surface de la mer en bande L G. Soriano*, M. Joelson**, P. Forget #, M. Saillard # * Institut Fresnel, UMR CNRS-Université.
Diffusion par des surfaces rugueuses: approximations faibles pentes Marc Saillard LSEET UMR 6133 CNRS-Université du Sud Toulon-Var BP 132, 83957 La Garde.

Diffusion par des surfaces rugueuses: approximations faibles pentes Marc Saillard LSEET UMR 6133 CNRS-Université du Sud Toulon-Var BP 132, La Garde.
A Short Note on Selecting a Microwave Scattering or Emission Model A.K. Fung 1 and K. S. Chen 2 1 Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Arlington Arlington,

A Short Note on Selecting a Microwave Scattering or Emission Model A.K. Fung 1 and K. S. Chen 2 1 Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Arlington Arlington,
Complex dielectric constant of sea foam for microwave remote sensing Magdalena D. Anguelova Peter W. Gaiser Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 15th.

Complex dielectric constant of sea foam for microwave remote sensing Magdalena D. Anguelova Peter W. Gaiser Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 15th.
Scattering property of rough surface of silicon solar cells Bai Lu a, b, *,Wu Zhensen a, Tang Shuangqing a and Pan Yongqiang b a School of Science, Xidian.

Scattering property of rough surface of silicon solar cells Bai Lu a, b, *,Wu Zhensen a, Tang Shuangqing a and Pan Yongqiang b a School of Science, Xidian.
Yalin Fan and Isaac Ginis GSO, University of Rhode Island Effects of surface waves on air- sea momentum and energy fluxes and ocean response to hurricanes.

Yalin Fan and Isaac Ginis GSO, University of Rhode Island Effects of surface waves on air- sea momentum and energy fluxes and ocean response to hurricanes.
July, 2003©2003 by H.L.Bertoni1 II. Plane Wave Propagation and Reflection in 3-D Propagation and interference in 3-D Reflection at plane surfaces Reflection.

July, 2003©2003 by H.L.Bertoni1 II. Plane Wave Propagation and Reflection in 3-D Propagation and interference in 3-D Reflection at plane surfaces Reflection.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.
Proposed Capabilities ASIS – Pulse-Coherent Sonars (RaDyO/SO GasEx) – Bubble-Size Distribution (Duck) Ship-Based – WaMoS II (SO GasEx) – Scanning LIDAR.

Proposed Capabilities ASIS – Pulse-Coherent Sonars (RaDyO/SO GasEx) – Bubble-Size Distribution (Duck) Ship-Based – WaMoS II (SO GasEx) – Scanning LIDAR.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.

RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.

ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
On the Retrieval of Accumulation Rates on the Ice Sheets Using SAR On the Retrieval of Accumulation Rates on the Ice Sheets Using SAR Wolfgang Dierking.

On the Retrieval of Accumulation Rates on the Ice Sheets Using SAR On the Retrieval of Accumulation Rates on the Ice Sheets Using SAR Wolfgang Dierking.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google