1. Children and Young People’s Health Support Group Review Group Member Survey Results November 2014

2. Survey Response Invitation sent to 36 members on the group, wide range of children and young peoples services. Received 17 responses (8 NHS, 3 LA, 2 Vol. Organs., 2 Academics, NES and SG). All senior members of their organisation. Most (9) have been a member of group for more than 5 years, with 7 members between 2-5 years.

3. Group Engagement Most (11) attended the group regularly (2 in every 3 meetings). Most (12) had asked a representative to attend, although this was rarely (8), and mostly due to demand on their time (8).

4. Group Purpose 1.Providing expert advice to Scottish Government on development of services 2.Identify areas requiring attention (innovation and improvement) 3.Provide advice on evaluation of services 4.Supporting NHS service delivery 5.Dissemination of best practice 6.Communication link with external stakeholders concerned with child health, including children, young people and families

5. What works well? 1. Providing expert advice to Scottish Government on development of services worked well (12) not worked well (5) 2. Identify areas requiring attention (innovation and improvement) worked well (15) not worked well (1) 3. Provide advice on evaluation of services worked well (1) not worked well (12) 4. Supporting NHS service delivery worked well (5) not worked well (4) 5. Dissemination of best practice worked well (5) not worked well (9) 6. Communication link with external stakeholders concerned with child health, including children, young people and families worked well (5) note worked well (6)

6. Group Priorities (Top 5) 1 st Priority (13) Statutory Guidance for the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2 nd Priority (10) Children’s wider community health services 3 rd Priority (9) Health and Social Care Integration Specialised children’s services 4 th Priority (8) Children with Disability Child Protection District General Hospitals Child Health Information Systems

7. Ways of working Most (8) happy for the group to meet 3 times a year (with 4 prefer 2x and 5 prefer 4x). Most thought subgroups were useful with a focus on short life working groups on new issues (11). Most (13) preferred suggestion for an annual work plan on priority topics for more in-depth consideration with some preference (4) for suggestion of covering priority topics at each meeting. View were split: either new issues should be submitted in preparation for meetings (6) or having a dedicated annual planning session to horizon scan on emerging new issues (6). Most (14) thought evidence could be contributed to group discussion though focused work relevant to priority issues.

8. Emerging Issues Group membership : wide range of interests Group purpose : working well providing advice and identifying issues, not working as well supporting wider service delivery and communication with external stakeholders? Group Priorities: which issues are priority for the CYPHSG? What action should CYPHSG take? Group ways of working: how address new issues?

9. Workshop Discussion 10:50Breakout Groups: Group Priorities and Action plan (Facilitation/capturing main points: Vikki, Kirsty, Susan Rooms 2, 5 and 6) Key Questions: What are the priorities for 2015? What action should CYPHSG take? Group membership right to address priorities? How will this link to other work? 11:50Group feedback and agreed work plan (Chair: Malcolm) 12:15Next Steps 12:30LUNCH