1. Psychology 2250 Last Class Characteristics of Habituation and Sensitization -time course -stimulus-specificity -effects of strong extraneous stimuli (dishabituation) Habituation and Sensitization in Aplysia Opponent Process Theory Pavlovian Conditioning Excitatory Conditioning

2. Fear Conditioning Eyeblink conditioning Sign Tracking (Autoshaping) Taste Aversion Learning Some Examples of Excitatory Classical Conditioning

3. Fear Conditioning Little Albert With rats, the aversive stimulus (US) is typically a brief shock delivered to the feet through a metal grid floor The CS may be a light or tone Tone Shock The CR in this case is typically freezing

4. Fear Conditioning Although the typical response of rats is to become motionless, we don’t always measure freezing directly. We often measure conditioned fear by observing how the CS disrupts the animal’s ongoing behavior A popular technique is the Conditioned Emotional Response (CER) procedure Also called Conditioned Suppression

5. Conditioned Emotional Response (CER) First train rats to barpress for food until they reach stable baseline of responding Then give Pavlovian pairings of T shock The shock will normally stop the rats from making the BP response After a few T shock pairings, look at suppression of BP when the T comes on.

6. Our measure of conditioning to the T is a suppression ratio suppression ratio = B/A+B; A = # BP before tone comes on (pre-CS) B = # BP during tone A+B = total BP If Tone is 5 sec, then measure BP for 5 sec before tone comes on and for 5 sec while the tone is presented.

7. For ex., B/A+B = 20/20+20 = 20/40 = 0.5 suppression ratio = 0.5 (indicates no conditioning) Rat is equally likely to make response in the presence or absence of the CS. If the T CS is not effective, then the rat will make as many barpresses during the tone as during the pre-CS interval before the tone comes on.

8. If the CS is effective, the suppression ratio will be closer to 0. For ex., B/A+B = 10/ 30+10 = 10/40 =.25 (i.e., 10 responses during the T, but 30 pre-CS responses) A value closer to 0 means more suppression (i.e., better/stronger CS)

10. Eyeblink Conditioning The procedure for classical conditioning of the eye-blink response.

12. Sign Tracking or Autoshaping Much of the work on autoshaping has been done using pigeons as subjects Keylight food Keylight = light comes on behind a translucent disk called a key After a few pairings of this keylight with food, the pigeons peck at the disk Food is given whether the pigeons peck at the key or not

13. Sign Tracking or Autoshaping

15. Taste-Aversion Learning Subjects consume a novel-flavored food or drink. Then subjects are given a treatment (e.g., drug, radiation, motion) which makes them sick. Then when the flavor is presented again, animals don’t consume as much as on the original trial We can’t measure sickness directly (as with salivation) but we infer the association has taken place when the animal stops drinking.

16. Taste-Aversion Learning CS = taste US = drug, radiation Saccharin LiCl Special features of conditioned taste aversions (CTA) -one trial learning -long-delay learning

17. Excitatory Pavlovian Conditioning Procedures The course of classical conditioning is determined by the timing of the CS and the US Each presentation of the CS and US represents a single Conditioning trial The time from the end of one conditioning trial to the start of the next trial is called the intertrial interval or ITI The time from the start of the CS to the start of the US is the interstimulus interval or ISI or CS-US interval ISI < ITI

18. Excitatory Pavlovian Conditioning Procedures

20. Measuring Conditioned Responses To compare the effectiveness of different conditioning procedures, we use a test trial – present the CS without the US Behavior during the CS can be quantified in several ways: magnitude probability latency

21. Control Procedures To determine whether changes in behavior are due to Conditioning procedures, must have a comparison group (Control Group) Pseudoconditioning – increased responding not due to a CS-US association (i.e., presentations of the US alone) Random Control procedure – present CS and US at random during the experiment Explicitly unpaired control – CS and US are presented far apart to prevent their association

22. Acquisition The time during which the subject acquires the association, as evidenced by the development of the CR i.e., autoshaping in pigeons— see increase in # pecks at the keylight) Extinction Occurs when a CS is given without a US. The CR strength declines during extinction trials. (covered in Ch. 9) Basic Stages in a Conditioning Experiment

23. Phases of classical conditioning: Classical conditioning proceeds through several phases, depending on the time of presentation of the two stimuli. If the conditioned stimulus regularly precedes the unconditioned stimulus, acquisition occurs. If the conditioned stimulus is presented by itself, extinction occurs. A pause after extinction yields a brief spontaneous recovery.

25. Extinction does not abolish the CS-US association Spontaneous recovery Give a rest period after the extinction phase and the CR will recover A likely explanation is renewed attention acquisition— increases attention to the CS extinction— decreases attention to the CS S.R. — renewed attention to the CS

26. Disinhibition If you present a novel stimulus along with the CS during extinction, see recovery of the CR. For ex., pair L shock in rats, see freezing in anticipation of shock. Freezing decreases during extinction (animals start to move around again). Present T with the L during extinction and the freezing reappears. Similar to dishabituation

27. CR renewal If extinction occurs in a different environment than acquisition, putting the animal back in the original environment evokes the CR again. For ex., Room A: T food pairings (acquisition— dog salivates to T) Room B: T no food (extinction— dog stops salivating to T) Put dog back in Room A again Dog will now salivate to T again.

28. .These 4 procedures show that extinction does not abolish the CS-US association The CR is merely inhibited Reinstatement Exposure to the US alone can reinstate conditioned responding T shock pairings; see CR to T Give T alone; CR decreases Give shock alone Present T and see CR

29. Inhibitory Pavlovian Conditioning Stimuli can become conditioned to signal the absence of a US in addition to signaling the presence of a US— such learning is called Inhibitory Conditioning CS+ = excitatory CS = CS US CS- = inhibitory CS = CS no US

30. Conditioned inhibition teaches an animal to inhibit, or hold back, a CR. An important prerequisite for conditioning a stimulus to signal the absence of some US is that the US be periodically presented in that context or situation For ex., put rat in a box T - (i.e., no US) This means nothing to the rat But if the rat is normally given food in that box, then T could become a conditioned inhibitor.

31. Inhibitory Conditioning only occurs if there is an excitatory context For the absence of a US to be a significant event, the US must periodically occur in this situation

32. Procedures for Inhibitory Conditioning Conditional (standard) CS+ (CS US) CS+/CS- (CS/CS no US) — the CS- gradually becomes a signal for the absence of the US — only get the US when the CS+ occurs. When the CS+ occurs in combination with the CS-, no US is given What is the excitatory context in this example?

33. Explicitly unpaired/Negative contingency Explicit CS+ training is not necessary for inhibitory conditioning Negative CS-US contingency (correlation) p(US/CS-) < p(US/no CS) If a US is presented in the experimental chamber but it is not signaled by explicit cues (i.e., no CS+), get some conditioning to the experimental chamber cues Box; normally get food US T- ; T becomes a CI p(food/T)< p(food/no T)