1. Inclusions Regulation Testing Situations Decide if the situation is a violation or not a violation. Cite the page and paragraph number from the document(s) to support your decision. 3/3/20141

2. Situation 1 A scribe wrote answers on a sheet of paper for a student with disabilities who can have a scribe. The student was required to copy answers into a Student Response Booklet as he had done throughout the school year. Not a Violation Page 18-19 – Inclusions Use of Scribes 3/3/20142

3. Situation 2 A student was hospitalized for a severely broken leg (in traction). The hjmebound teacher administered the test to the student in the hospital. Not a Violation Page 5 – Inclusions Summary, paragraph 4 Page 13 – Section 4, part B 3/3/20143

4. Situation 3 Two students had similar answers, but had not copied. It was determined that one had listened intently as the other dictated answers to a scribe. Violation Page 9 – Administration Practices Not Acceptable, paragraph 1 3/3/20144

5. Situation 4 A student has a learning disability that significantly impacts her reading ability. Her IEP states materials may be presented orally. The guidance counselor had her come to his office so he could read the test to her. Not a Violation Page 9 – Administration Practices Not Acceptable, paragraph 1 Acceptable, paragraph 1 3/3/20145

6. Situation 5 A school needs to use multiple scribes and readers with special education students. The school schedules these scribes and readers to provide accommodations at the same time in a single room. Violation Page 9 – Administration Practices Not Acceptable, paragraph 1 3/3/20146

7. Situation 6 The district has three new students that have been identified as needing specific accommodations to be included in a 504 Plan. The ARC immediately develops 504 Plans, close to testing, which will allow the students to use the accommodations for instruction and during testing. Not a Violation Page 6 – Inclusions 2a, b, c 3/3/20147

8. Situation 7 A student routinely uses a word processor with word prediction as outlined in his 504 Plan and he uses both features for K-PREP. Not a Violation Page 9 – Administration Practices Acceptable, paragraph 1 Page 6 – Inclusions 2a, b, c 3/3/20148

9. Situation 8 Documentation of a students IEP is shared with the proctor that will be administering the state assessment to the student. Not a Violation Page 9 – Administration Practices Acceptable, paragraph 1 3/3/20149

10. Situation 9 A proctor questions a students use of a personal cueing notebook that seems to be very content specific. Additional investigation finds that all special education students have the same exact notebook. Violation Page 22-23 – Inclusions Prompting and Cueing 3/3/201410

11. Situation 10 A student was taking the Mathematics portion of the K-PREP. He used (from his prompting and cueing notebook) a cue card with multiple mathematical formulas and sample problems. Violation Page 23-24 of the Inclusions document Use of Prompting and Cueing 3/3/201411

12. Situation 11 A student with illegible handwriting was given a scribe. Violation Page 18-19 of the Inclusions document Use of Scribes 3/3/201412

13. Situation 12 Five LEP students were purposely assigned the same form of the test so one interpreter could work with all the students at the same time. Not a Violation Page 11 – Inclusions Section C, 1, paragraph 2 3/3/201413