Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Polar Planar vs. Polar Vertical Reverse Tilt Domain Walls Charles Rosenblatt, Case Western Reserve University, DMR 0345109 Left: Polarized photomicrograph.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Polar Planar vs. Polar Vertical Reverse Tilt Domain Walls Charles Rosenblatt, Case Western Reserve University, DMR 0345109 Left: Polarized photomicrograph."— Presentation transcript:

1 Polar Planar vs. Polar Vertical Reverse Tilt Domain Walls Charles Rosenblatt, Case Western Reserve University, DMR 0345109 Left: Polarized photomicrograph of textures, showing superposition of pinned filaments and Schlieren brushes. a) T=25°C, b) T=40°, c) T=55°, d) T=70°. Below: Calculated energy per unit length of domain wall vs. pretilt angle θ 0 for polar horizontal and polar vertical walls. The three sets of curves represent three different angles ( ϕ = 0, π/4, and π/2) of the director with respect to the wall, where Δ ϕ = π for all three cases. For any given pretilt angle  just below T NI, the stable configuration corresponds to that with the lowest energy. Special treatment of a glass substrate allows us to control the polar orientation (called the “pretilt angle”) of liquid crystal molecules. The two extreme orientations are vertical (pretilt angle  = 0) and planar (  = 90 o ), with intermediate angles both possible and scientifically interesting. If the surface treatment does not specify an azimuthal orientation , then domain structures can appear, where the azimuthal angle of the liquid crystal can vary smoothly over the surface. But if two domains where  differs by approximately 180 o meet, the filament-like wall that separates the domains can have two different structures (shown schematically in the figure at the right), depending upon the value of  just below the transition temperature T NI from the liquid crystalline nematic phase to the isotropic phase. The image above shows “Polar Vertical” domain walls as a function of increasing temperature. As the temperature is increased, the pretilt angle  becomes smaller (closer to the vertical orientation), with a decrease in optical contrast across the wall. At sufficiently high temperature the walls vanish, but a “memory” of the walls is retained, so that on cooling the walls return exactly as they had been before heating.

2 Polar Planar vs. Polar Vertical Reverse Tilt Domain Walls Charles Rosenblatt, Case Western Reserve University, DMR 0345109 Broader Impact:  A deeper understanding of domain structure and interfacial energies in liquid crystals  Connection linking the soft condensed matter community with the more traditional solid state community.  Presentation of results at several international venues, including France, Italy, China, Hong Kong, and Korea.  Formalized university-to-university international exchange programs with the Liquid Crystal National Laboratory, Universita della Calabria (Italy) and with Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris, France). A similar agreement with Nagaoka University of Technology (Japan) is nearly finalized. Education: Two graduate students (Ruiting Wang and Minhua Zhu), two postdocs (Timothy Atherton and Ji-Hoon Lee), and one visiting professor (Daeseung Kang) were involved in this project. Zhu now works at Kent Optronics in New York, Wang is a student in New York, Atherton and Lee are currently postdocs in my group (Lee is a research fellow funded by the Korean Research Foundation), and Kang is a professor at Soongsil University in Seoul.


Download ppt "Polar Planar vs. Polar Vertical Reverse Tilt Domain Walls Charles Rosenblatt, Case Western Reserve University, DMR 0345109 Left: Polarized photomicrograph."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google