1. FOCUS ON WOMEN Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission Presented to The Mayor’s Commission on the Status of Women August 3, 2013

2. Total population Sex Age Race and Hispanic Origin

3. 934,215

4. Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.

5.  Life expectancy for men and women in 1920 was 1 year difference  Life expectancy for men and women in 1990 was 7 years difference  Life expectancy for men and women in 2011 is 5 years difference  At birth, there are more males than females. By age 36, the trend turns to more females than males. At age 100, women outnumber men by 8 to 1

6. Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.

10. 10 Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Censuses. +7.9% -14.1% -9.3% +17.4% +51.7% +57.9% +113.5%

13. Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

16. 16 Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

18.  Oklahoma has the highest female incarceration rate among states at 132/100,000 – almost double national average (68)  2,700 Oklahoma women were incarcerated in 2011  67% for non-violent offenses  3% of Oklahoma children have at least one parent in prison  Children with an incarcerated parent are five times more likely to spend time in prison themselves  Average length of stay is 1.9 years  3 year recidivism rate is 14.4%  Offense categories (fy2010 receptions)  Possession/obtaining CDS: 23.8%  Distribution CDS: 19.1%  Forgery: 8.5%  Larceny: 7.1%  Assault: 7.0%

19. Source:

20. Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE). Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (11/2012).

21. Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

23. 23 (23.2%) (35.3%) (18.0%) (23.5%) Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

25.  Total of 65.7 million caregivers in the US (29% of adult population)  An estimated 66% of caregivers are women  The average caregiver age is 48

27. Indicator Oklahoma rank Best State (#1) Worst State (#50) Overall child well-being36 New HampshireNew Mexico Economic well-being25 North DakotaMississippi Education40 MassachusettsNevada Health43 MaineMontana Family and Community39 New HampshireMississippi Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

28. IndicatorU.S. rate Tulsa County rate Oklahoma rate Oklahoma rank Best rank Median family income$58,000$54,442$49,400750 Children in poverty23% 301 Children below 200% poverty45%47%49%351 Population in poverty16%15%17%331 Children 3 & 4 not enrolled in preschool54%50%59%341 Population 25-34 not high school graduate12%15%13%361 Children living in concentrated poverty12%16%12%341 Children in single parent families35%30%36%301 Children living with neither parent5%10%6%411 Low birth weight babies8.1%8.8%8.4%301 Children confirmed victims of maltreatment9/1,000 8/1,000191 Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

29. Conception Death Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

30.  Recurrent physical abuse  Recurrent emotional abuse  Sexual abuse  An alcohol or drug abuser  An incarcerated household member  Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill  Mother being treated violently  Living with one or neither parent  Emotional or physical neglect Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”  Smoking  Overeating  Physical inactivity  Heavy alcohol use  Drug use  Promiscuity  Nicotine addiction  Alcoholism  Drug addiction  Obesity  Depression  Suicide  Injuries  Unintentional pregnancy  Adolescent pregnancy  Heart disease  Cancer  Chronic lung and liver disease  Stroke  Diabetes  Fetal death  Sexually transmitted diseases

31. Source: Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy, “Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007;” Annie E. Casey Foundation,“KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.” Parental divorce or separation5.2 divorce and annulment/1,000 residents Children in single parent families36% of children Children living with neither parent6% of children Incarcerated household member47.7 index crimes/1,000 residents Mentally ill household member11.0% psychological distress rate Substance abusing household member5.1% substance abuse rate Violence against mother16.3 protective orders files/1,000 adult women Psychological, physical & sexual abuse or neglect 8 child maltreatment confirmations/1,000 children

32. Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst *Indicates a tie with at least one other county Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy Tulsa County Parental separation or divorce49 Incarcerated household member76 Mentally ill household member77 Substance abusing household member76* Violence against mother57 Psychological, physical & sexual abuse12 Emotional & physical neglect4 Overall ranking31

36.  A woman is assaulted or beaten every 9 seconds in the US  Nationally, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner  876 homicides due to domestic violence identified from 1998 to 2008 in Oklahoma  Men who as children witnessed their parents’ domestic violence were twice as likely to abuse their own wives than sons of nonviolent parents

37. Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

38. Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Office of Accountability, 2011-12 AMO (Annual Measurable Objectives); Oklahoma State Department of Education ”no child Left Behind Act” Annual Report Card 2010-11.

43. Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

45. Labor force participation Living wage and poverty Role of education Program participation Income inequality

48. 48 Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 57.1% 68.2% 62.5% Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

49. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 25.2% 27.9% 26.5% 49 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

50. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 62.3% 69.4% 65.9% 50 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

51. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 74.6% 88.1% 81.3% 51 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

52. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 27.5% 35.1% 31.0% 52 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

53. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 8.0% 12.8% 10.0% 53 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

54. Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012. 71.0% 63.4% 67.2% 75.9% 56.1% 63.1% 59.5% 57.9% 57.2% 54 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

56. Family Size Self-Sufficiency Wage (annual) Poverty Guidelines (annual) Dollar Difference Self- Sufficiency Percent of Poverty One person $21,227 ($10.05/hour) $11,490 ($5.44/hour) $9,737185% Two persons $38,033 ($18.01/hour) $15,510 ($7.34/hour) $22,523245% Three persons $43,526 ($20.61/hour) $19,530 ($9.25/hour) $23,996223% Four persons $51,027 ($12.08/hour/adult) $23,550 ($5.58/hour/adult) $27,477217% Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013.

60. Population Cohort All income levels 100% of poverty level 185% of poverty level 200% of poverty level Oklahoma Total population 3,600,116586,0461,257,7431,370,140 Under 18 904,990207,625410,242442,356 Under 6 306,02382,266156,312167,709 65+ 480,32845,926149,077166,306 Tulsa County Total population 586,41788,355189,803206,528 Under 18 149,93633,8676,551070,098 Under 6 52,33314,13226,23727,781 65+ 69,3505,69618,33420,645 Note: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics. Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

63. An estimated 88,355 persons live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 15.1% In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 74,217 persons live in poverty, for a rate of 19.4%.

64. An estimated 14,132 children under age 6 live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 27.0%. In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 12,121 children under age 6 live in poverty, for a rate of 35.2%.

65. An estimated 33,867 children under age 18 live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 22.6%. In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 28,762 children under age 18live in poverty, for a rate of 30.6%.

66. An estimated 5,696 persons age 65 and over live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 8.2%. In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 4,574 persons age 65 and over live in poverty, for a rate of 9.6%.

67. Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 67

68. Chart credit : Economic Policy Institute, “The State of Working America, 12 th edition.” 68

71. Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $29.56 $24.46 $18.06 $16.77 $14.63 $37.34 $28.28 $17.30 $15.78 $11.75

72. Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $25.30 $19.10 $13.79 $12.76 $10.31 $31.55 $24.21 $15.53 $13.70 $10.06

73. Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14. $31.07 $27.97 $20.73 $20.27 $17.10 $43.42 $32.54 $19.20 $17.41 $12.75

76. Oklahoma = 8.0 Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. 76

77. 77 Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012. OklahomaUnited States

78. 78 US Oklahoma Tulsa County City of Tulsa Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

81. Source: Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 57, March 23, 2012 Household Size Federal Poverty Guidelines Reduced Price Meals: 185% of poverty Free Meals: 130% of poverty 1$11,170$20,665$14,521 2$15,130$27,991$19,669 3$19,090$35,317$24,817 4$23,050$42,643$29,965 5$27,010$49,969$35,113 6$30,970$57,295$40,261 7$34,930$64,621$45,409 8$38,890$71,947$50,557 For each add’l member, add $3,960$7,326$5,148

87. Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE, Mortality Data.

89. FOCUS ON WOMEN Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission …is available on our website: www.csctulsa.org