1. Student: Dane Brown 2713985 Supervisor : James Connan and Mehrdad Ghaziasgar

2. OVERVIEW  INTRODUCTION  DESIGN DECISIONS  IMPLEMENTATION  PROJECT PLAN  DEMO

3. INTRODUCTION  Extremely high crime rate in South Africa Car break-in rate was 16000 in 2009 18 times the rate of USA Carjacking is the most common crime in South Africa Costing tax payers billions of rands!

4. INTRODUCTION cont.

5.  CCTV cameras Human monitored Current solution ineffective Continued high break-in rate

6. INTRODUCTION cont.

8. DESIGN DECISIONS

9. IMPLEMENTATION  Original frame in RGB colour

10. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  Gray Scale and Frame differencing

11. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  Motion History Image (MHI)

12. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  Blob and movement detection (using MHI)

13. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  Blob and movement detection

14. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  Blob and movement detection

15. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Park car

16. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Park car

17. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Get out

18. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Walk away

19. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Walk away

20. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Get back in

21. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Drive away

22. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines normal activity Drive away

23. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

24. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

25. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

26. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

27. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

28. IMPLEMENTATION cont.  System determines suspicious activity Loitering next to a vehicle is suspicious

29. IMPLEMENTATION cont.

31.  Suspicious activity detected!

32.  1. Normal activity - typical drive away  2. Suspicious - two men loitering  3. Suspicious - Stationary  4. Suspicious - Acceleration DEMO

33. REFERENCES  Davis, J. W. (2005). Motion History Image. Retrieved 2010, from The Ohia State University.  Green, B. (2002). Histogram, Thresholding and Image Centroid Tutorial. Retrieved 2010, from Drexel University site.  Trip Atlas. (2010). Retrieved from Carjacking: http://tripatlas.com/Carjacking#South%20Africa  Hijacking. (2010). Retrieved from Arrive Alive: http://www.arrivealive.co.za/pages.aspx?i=2364