1. Allee effects and Spatial Heterogeneity By Nicholas Viveros and Jessica Oh

2. Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States By Whitmire et al. Spread of gypsy moth is thought to be the result of growth and coalescence of isolated colonies in a transition zone ahead of infested area Isolated colonies are affected by Allee effect and stochastic events

3. Gypsy moth – basic information Introduced into the United States in 1868 by a French scientist, Leopold Trouvelot, living in Medford, Massachusetts. Overwintering eggs hatch in the spring and larvae feed on both young and fully developed foilage Dispersal – ballooning early instars and adult male flight

4. Methods Placed over 50,000 pheromone-baited traps in the transition zone. Traps placed at intertrap distance of 2 km and placed using handheld GPS units within a 500 m radius from target coordinates

5. Results Isolated colonies in Wisconsin were 1.7x more likely to persist than colonies in the Appalachian region and the Midwest Isolated colonies were more likely to persist when closer to the generally infested area The basal area of preferred host species and land use did not explain differences in persistence rates among regions

7. Gypsy Moth Management Entomophaga maimaiga – Japanese fungus natural enemy of gypsy moth larvae Specificity - the fungus affects only larvae of Lepidoptera (order of butterflies and moths) Equally virulent in low and high gypsy moth populations Typical appearance of gypsy moth larvae killed by Entomophaga maimaiga.

8. Questions What is the difference between persistence and spread?

9. Questions What affects small isolated populations of gypsy moths?

10. Questions Are there any other factors that can affect the spread of gypsy moths that are not mentioned in the paper?

11. Questions Should the paper have included a map to orient the reader? Source: US Forest Service

12. Questions All regions are political boundaries; how would you define your regions?

13. Questions How can you make sure that you have the correct resolution of data? What criteria would you use to assess that the scale of the datasets is biologically relevant to the species in the experiment?

14. Questions Why do isolated colonies closer to the parent populations persist at a greater rate?

15. Questions What could cause Allee effects to be potentially different in different regions?

16. Spatial heterogeneity and rates of spread in experimental streams Simpson et al. Landscape models suggest that the spatial scale and pattern of environmental heterogeneity interacts with dispersal scale/distance to determined spread rate Two possible processes: - short-distance dispersal  must spread through each patch (end result = slower) - long-distance events  can skip over less suitable patches (end result= faster spread)

17. Species Freshwater diatom – Nitzschia palea Disperse through water flow Average movement rate of 90 cm/day

18. Methods and Materials artificial streams (unidirectional flow = disperal bias towards downstream) control variable: phosphate (limiting resource) availablity and distribution

19. Figure 1

20. Experimental design each environmental "patch" = agar plate stream bottoms: 21 agar plates - inoculation site at central patch (upstream and downstream) 3 possible resource levels/patches: low (20 µg phosphate /liter),intermediate (55), high (100) heterogenous set-up = alternating high and low vs. homogenous set-up = all intermediate

21. Results Spread rate slower in upstream direction than downstream for heterogeneous stream - The opposite phenomena found for homogenous stream

22. Figure 3

23. Results cont. Differences in time to colonization (Tc) among patches: Tc(high) < Tc(average)< Tc(low) i.e. phosphate variablity affects Tc positive linear relationship between growth rate and phosphate level (Figure 4, part c)

24. Figure 4

25. Questions How were the nutrient levels varied in the heterogeneous stream? Do you think that it was effective in terms of the experiment?

26. Questions Why were the researchers unable to disentangle dispersal from colonization in the diatoms?

27. Questions Are there any factors that the researchers did not control for?

28. Questions How did the researchers find the data seen in this figure?

30. Questions What mechanism could account for the trend that the rate of spread upstream was slower in a heterogeneous stream than that of the rate downstream?

31. Questions Why does environmental heterogeneity does not influence downstream colonization rates?

33. Questions How would you test the hypothesis that the stronger movement upstream is due to an evolutionary bias?

35. Questions How does flow affect gliding motility?