1. 2/5/20101 R-DCR ARB Preparation A Winsor Brown CS 577B Spring 2010

2. 2/5/20102 Outline  IICM-Sw Review  Original RDCR ARB Presentation Guidelines  Revised, depending on situation RDCR ARB Presentation Guidelines

3. 2/5/20103 July 2008©USC-CSSE3 The Incremental Commitment Life Cycle Process: Overview Stage I: DefinitionStage II: Development and Operations Anchor Point Milestones Synchronize, stabilize concurrency via FEDs Risk patterns determine life cycle process

4. 2/5/20104 RUP/ ICM Activity/SDLC Model

5. 2/5/20105 Adjust Scope, priorities, or discontinue Too High, unaddressable Too High, unaddressable Exploration Valuation Foundations Development ECRECR ECRECR VCRVCR VCRVCR FCRFCR FCRFCR DCRDCR DCRDCR Team formed, project assigned Start of Fall Semester Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Risk? Semester Break RDCRRDCR RDCRRDCR Risk? Team reformed, project assigned CCDCCD CCDCCD TRR1TRR1 TRR1TRR1 Risk? Client Evaluation Client Evaluation, Close Out Report End of Spring Semester Project Release Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) OCROCR OCROCR CCD-Core Capability Drivethrough; DCR- Development Commitment Review; ECR-Evaluation Commitment Review; FCR-Foundations Commitment Review; OCR- Operational Commitment Review; RDCR-Rebaselined Development Commitment Review; TRR-Transition Readiness Review; VCR-Valuation Commitment Review Operation Construction Transitio n Risk? TRR2TRR2 TRR2TRR2

6. 2/5/20106 Exploration Valuation ECRECR ECRECR VCRVCR VCRVCR FCRFCR FCRFCR Start of Fall Semester Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) Project Artifacts (Exploration – Valuation phase) Team formed, project assigned Client Interaction Report Individual Project Effort Reports, Weekly Project Plans, Weekly Progress Reports, Weekly Risk Analyses VC Package (Top Level of OCD, LCP, FED) Initial Prototype Wiki WinWin Report Core FC Package (OCD, SSRD, LCP,FED, SID) Draft FC Package (OCD, SSRD, SSAD, UML, FED, SID) FC Package Evaluation of VC Package Evaluation of Initial Prototype Evaluation of Core FC Package Evaluation of Draft FC Package Evaluation of Draft FC Package Respond to Evaluation of Core FC Package Respond to Evaluation of FC Package QMP-I Corrective Action Item List

7. 2/5/20107 Foundations DCRDCR DCRDCR End of Fall Semester Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) Project Artifacts (Foundations phase) Individual Project Effort Reports, Weekly Project Plans, Weekly Progress Reports, Weekly Risk Analyses QMP-II Wiki WinWin Report Draft DC Package DC Package Evaluation of Draft DC Package Evaluation of DC Package Respond to Evaluation of Draft DC Package Annotated Outlines of the extended FC Package (AO FC Package) Follow up of AO FC Package & Corrective Action Item List

8. 2/5/20108 Foundations TRR1TRR1 TRR1TRR1 Start of Spring Semester Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) Project Artifacts (CSCI577B) (Rebaselined Foundations – Development – Operations phase) Individual Project Effort Reports, Weekly Project Plans, Weekly Progress Reports, Weekly Risk Analyses Updated Wiki WinWin Report CCD Report Draft Transition Package, IOC working set, OC Package Evaluation of Draft Transition Package Development Operation Construction Transition Team formed, project assigned RDCRRDCR RDCRRDCR Respond to Evaluation of Draft RDC Package Draft RDC Package, IOC Working Set Eval of Draft RDC Package CCDCCD CCDCCD OCROCR OCROCR RDC Package, IOC Working Set Evaluation of IOC Working Set Transition Package, IOC working set, OC Package Evaluation of Transition Package All project Deliverables Executable Components End of Spring Semester T1 T2 TRR2TRR2 TRR2TRR2

9. 2/5/20109 Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) One semester project CCD-Core Capability Drivethrough; DCR- Development Commitment Review; ECR-Evaluation Commitment Review; FCR-Foundations Commitment Review; OCR- Operational Commitment Review; RDCR-Rebaselined Development Commitment Review; TRR-Transition Readiness Review; VCR-Valuation Commitment Review Adjust Scope, priorities, or discontinue Too High, unaddressable Too High, unaddressable Exploration Valuation Foundations Development ECRECR ECRECR VCRVCR VCRVCR FCRFCR FCRFCR DCRDCR DCRDCR Team formed, project assigned Start of Fall Semester Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Risk? CCDCCD CCDCCD TRRTRR TRRTRR Client Evaluation, Close Out Report End of Fall Semester Project Release Risk? OCROCR OCROCR Operation Construction Transitio n Risk? ECRECR ECRECR VCRVCR VCRVCR Typical Project Milestones Core FC Package 11/2112/0111/1410/2010/0609/22 Draft DC Package 08/22 ARBARB ARBARB ARBARB ARBARB Negligible

10. 2/5/201010 CS577 Projects' Paths and Options  Full two semester –Completed software for a "system" –Inception, Elaboration, Construction, mini-Transition  Single Semester –System "Feasibility" demonstration –COTS assessment and recommendation –Inception and Elaboration (for later "implementation” Second Semester (possibly delayed) –Completed software for a "system" –Re-baselined Elaboration, Construction, mini-Transition  Third Semester –Enhancement (more functionality) IECT –Full Transition

11. 2/5/201011 Incremental Commitment Model (Instructional ICM-Sw) Too High, unaddressable CCD-Core Capability Drivethrough; DCR- Development Commitment Review; ECR-Evaluation Commitment Review; FCR-Foundations Commitment Review; OCR- Operational Commitment Review; RDCR-Rebaselined Development Commitment Review; TRR-Transition Readiness Review; VCR-Valuation Commitment Review Adjust Scope, priorities, or discontinue Too High, unaddressable Exploration Valuation Foundations Development ECRECR ECRECR VCRVCR VCRVCR FCRFCR FCRFCR DCRDCR DCRDCR Team formed, project assigned Start of Fall Semester Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Negligible Acceptable Risk? High, but addressable Risk? Semester Break RDCRRDCR RDCRRDCR Risk? Team reformed, project assigned CCDCCD CCDCCD TRR1TRR1 TRR1TRR1 Risk? Client Evaluation Client Evaluation, Close Out Report End of Spring Semester Project Release OCROCR OCROCR Operation Construction Transition Risk? TRR2TRR2 TRR2TRR2 OCD, LCP, FED FCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP* Prototype FCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP* Prototype DCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP**, ATPC^, IP †, TP ‡, Exec. Prototype DCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP**, ATPC^, IP †, TP ‡, Exec. Prototype DCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP, ATPC, IP, TP, Exec. Prototype DCP-Level OCD, SSRD, SSAD, LCP, FED, SID, QMP, ATPC, IP, TP, Exec. Prototype * Peer Review Strategy for Foundations; ** Peer Review and Test Strategy For Development; ^ at least one test case; † Skeletal for up through CCD; ‡ Team/Client tasks and dates identified

12. 2/5/201012 Completion progress of project artifacts in each phase

13. 2/5/201013 RDCR ARB Presentation Guidelines  Dates: February 11-12  Location: SAL 322  Arrange with client; sign up ASAP!  Topics to cover in your presentation & recommended time allocations 10 min: Summary of Change Sources & Resulting Changes 10 min: Highlights of any Prototype Changes »Highlights as appropriate »Be prepared to do a FULL (functional) demo 25 min: Description of Major (Foundation) Changes 20 min: Construction Plans; Transition Plan Draft 15 min: General Discussions

14. 2/5/201014 RDCR ARB in Projects with Big Changes RDCR ARB Session Outline (x,y): (presentation time, total time) (2, 2)What ARB outline are you following and why (5, 5)OCD. System purpose; changes in current system and deficiencies, proposed new system, system boundary, and desired capabilities and goals; top-level scenarios (5,10) Prototype Update. Changes in significant capabilities (especially those with high risk if gotten wrong) (5, 10) SSRD. ALL high priority or changes in requirements; rating for all others (10, 15)Architecture. Overall and detailed architecture; design if critical; COTS/reuse selections (NOT JUST CHOICES) (10, 15)Life Cycle Plan. Focus on 577b (no history) or ? as appropriate; Include QMP and plans for CTS initial cycle “Plans” during 2nd Elab. Iter. Team members’ roles & responsibilities in 577b. (5, 10) Feasibility Rationale. Refined business case; major risks; general discussion (5, 10) Things done right; issues to address (IV&V) (5, 5) Feedback from Instructors Plan on 2 minutes per briefing chart, except title Focus on changes (particularly new things) since LCO You may vary from the above: please notify ARB board members IN ADVANCE

15. 2/5/201015 Propose Your Own Outline  Mix and Match from last years and RDCR for projects with big changes  …