1. Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report School of Dental Medicine (SoDM) Geralyn Crain, DDS, PhD Assistant Dean for Educational Support and Faculty Development June 4, 2014 1 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment, and Research

2. Mentoring/Review Process –“Because we are a new school…”: SoDM curriculum and student assessment are highly “centralized” Faculty are “fully engaged” in developing & delivering content Accreditation every two years! –Initial, interim approach: Assistant Dean and Director of Program Planning & Assessment met with key faculty and administrators to determine initial outcomes, criteria for success, results, etc. These same 2 individuals + Susan Morrissey = “ARC” 22013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

3. 2012-13 Component Data DevelopingAcceptableProficient Outcome0210 Means of Assessment 0111 Criteria for Success 426 Results273 Actions Taken291 Follow-Up to Actions Taken 1110 32013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

4. Data Visualization 42013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

5. Substantive Changes Program/Unit: Reorganization of the entire SoDM assessment process Description of Changes: Establishing Sustainable Working Action Groups (SWAGs) according to groups of related accreditation standards –SWAGs will continue their work between accreditation site visits (every 7 years) Justification for Changes: –SWAGs most closely related to curriculum will work in place of a “traditional” curriculum committee –SWAGs will focus on ongoing assessment; will be able to draw from SWAGs to form a new ARC 52013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

7. 2-21Graduates must be competent to access, critically appraise, apply and communicate scientific and lay literature as it relates to providing evidence-based patient care. 5-2Patient care must be evidence-based, integrating the best research evidence and patient values. 6-1Research…must be an integral component of the purpose/mission, goals and objectives of the school. 6-2The dental school faculty…must engage in research or other forms of scholarly activity. 6-3Dental education programs must provide opportunities, encourage, and support student participation in research and other scholarly activities mentored by faculty.

8. Rubric and Review Process Feedback Feedback on the rubric and review process. –Susan and Susan were great! –Bottom line: one-on-one “handholding” worked best for us (but is this sustainable for the institution?) What difficulties were encountered? Looking forward to new format… SoDM ARC’s process and progress towards addressing comments for “developing” and “acceptable” components received in the 2013 assessment review: –This year: Assistant Dean, Director, and Susan(s) –Future: SWAGs 82013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research