1. ESIL-02 Overview

2. Workshop Ground Rules All attendees represent themselves only and do NOT represent the views of their employer Please consider discussions during this workshop off-the-record Specific quotes or opinions that aren’t your own should remain off the web/social media

3. Objectives Assemble a representative and knowledgeable group of the key emerging leaders within the U.S. space sector to -identify the role of the U.S. Government in the commercial space sector -how this role should evolve in the future from the perspective of the assembled group Connect emerging leaders throughout the industry with peers and current industry leaders

4. Workshop Products Out-brief Tuesday at 4 PM Further research/development after workshop Paper/Presentation IAC 2012, Naples Italy – Additional presentations possible

6. Method Identify role of government in commercial space as: – Customer – Supplier – Regulator – International Representation Identify how this role may evolve in the future – What are the key things that need to be considered?

7. Method II Consider government effect on competitive forces: – Threat of Entry – Intensity of Rivalry Among Existing Competitors – Pressure from Substitute Products – Bargaining Power of Buyers – Bargaining Power of Suppliers

8. Industry Definition Scope is as broad as group feels appropriate – From comsats to commercial crew Certain cross-cutting topics exist – What is considered important by this group? – What possible improvements can be made? Certain sector-specific topics exist – What is considered important by this group? – What possible improvements can be made?

9. Cross-Cutting Gov. Influence Export control – Includes products and workforce – Prevents export AND import US Firms Competing Overseas (favors larger firms) Foreign Firms Competing in US (favors larger firms) – Impacts all industry segments – Impacts all five forces

10. Cross-Cutting Gov. Influence Contracting Mechanism/Good Customer – Cost-plus vs fixed price, FAR vs OTA FAR + commercial industry may not be most efficient – Skin the game? – Government as secondary customer/payload? – Impacts all industry sectors – Impacts all five forces

11. Cross-Cutting Gov. Influence Research, Development, and Education – Workforce training/pipeline Support for fundamental research and fellowships Support for re-training in areas of industry need – Prizes Cost-effective innovation engine? – IP Protection and expedited evaluation

12. Cross-Cutting Gov. Influence Space Traffic Coordination – Domestic Launch/Airspace Interface Range Operations – International Orbital Debris/Space Traffic Management Spectrum Interference/Jamming Civil vs military considerations

13. Summary of Impacts Where are we today? What is the result?

14. Path of Evolution Where might these roles go in the future? What possible improvements might be made?

15. Sector Specific Impacts Launch Sector – Liability indemnification – Launch permit/license – Cargo/Crew

16. Sector Specific Impacts Human Transport Systems – Suborbital/Orbital Crew safety standards? Launch component and vehicle component – Industry development financing As customer/investor – FAR/SAA – Cost-plus vs fixed price – International competition

17. Sector Specific Impacts Commercial Remote Sensing – Restrictions on publishable performance – Major Customer

18. Sector Specific Impacts Commercial Communications – LEO/GEO – Spectrum allocation/management – Customer – Hosted Payloads – Secondary Payloads

19. Summary of Impacts Where are we today? What is the result?

20. Path of Evolution Where might these roles go in the future? What possible improvements might be made?

22. Out-Brief Structure (concept) Background on objectives Overview of method Overview of cross-cutting impacts Identification of on-going/future improvements Overview of sector-specific impacts Identification of on-going/future improvements

23. Post-Workshop Plan Build on presentation with additional research and input Identify lead authors and contributing/review authors – Note authorship will not include affiliation – Participants represent their own views Draft paper overviewing factors and possible improvements Paper review process Develop paper and presentation for IAC 2012 Present elsewhere as appropriate