1. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.1 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Sidebar 4.1 Why Are Requirements Important? Top factors that caused project to fail –Incomplete requirements –Lack of user involvement –Unrealistic expectations –Lack of executive support –Changing requirements and specifications –Lack of planning –System no longer needed Requirements error can be expensive if not detected early

2. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.2 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall The Requirements Process Outcome – Software Requirements Specification (SRS)

3. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.3 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Stakeholders Clients: pay for the software to be developed Customers: buy the software after it is developed Users: use the system Domain experts: familiar with the problem that the software must automate Market Researchers: conduct surveys to determine future trends and potential customers Lawyers or auditors: familiar with government, safety, or legal requirements Software engineers or other technology experts

4. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.4 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Entity-Relationship Diagram for turnstile problem

5. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.5 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall UML Class Diagram for Library Problem  

6. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.6 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Message Sequence Chart for library load

7. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.7 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall State Machines for Turnstile Problem

8. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.8 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Use Cases Library use cases including borrowing a book, returning a borrowed book, and paying a library fine

9. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.9 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Prototyping Example First a workable simple Interface for entering a date

10. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.10 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Prototyping Example A more interesting and sophisticated interface

11. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.11 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Prototyping Example Next version – user is presented with three slide bars –Pros and Cons?

12. Pfleeger and Atlee, Software Engineering: Theory and PracticePage 4.12 © 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall Techniques to validate requirements