1. Achievements of the Polish Enforcements in the Anti-Counterfeit Activities Artur Łączyński Mirosława Konicka Main Inspectorate of State Plant Health and Seed Warsaw, 13 th November, 2008

2. Overview of issue related to illegal trade with counterfeit ppp State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service – structure Detection and proving the counterfeits of plant protection products (ppp), current findings and taken measures Risk at illegal ppp trade and use, problems at evidence collecting Organizations / authorities cooperating in proceedings on falsified ppp Future undertakings and conclusions

3. State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service  SPHSIS is the national authority to supervise and control Marketing and application of ppp Plant health Seed production  The major SPHSIS task is the elimination of potential threats coming from marketing and application of ppp

4. Organization of SPHSIS in Poland 16 voivodships include 379 poviats according to administrative division of the country 16 voivodship inspectorates include 271 field units and 12 border divisions Human resources – 2 200 staff members voivodeship inspectorate

5. Organization structure of SPHSIS

6. Controls carried out by SPHIS in the domain of trade and use of plant protection products (ppp) PPP trade allowed only by registered entrepreneurs Checking expiration dates, validity of approval for trade and use of ppp’s Controls of packages, etiquette-labellings and documentation e.g. invoices, product origin and distribution Checking registers of purchasers of toxic and very toxic substances Control sampling and laboratory analysis on ppp quality (above 350 planned samples per year, and intervention samples according to needs), Controls of ppp application e.g. usage documentation, pesticide residues

7. Laboratory testing on quality of ppp Accreditated Laboratory of Institute of Plant Protection, SOŚNICOWICE Branch,

8. Laboratories testing on pesticide residues in plant products Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Pesticide Residue Research in POZNAŃ Institute of Plant Protection, Regional Experimental Station BIAŁYSTOK, Pesticide Residue Analyses Laboratory, Institute of Plant Protection, SOŚNICOWICE Branch Food Safety Laboratory, Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture in SKIERNIEWICE Central Laboratory, Main Inspectorate of Plant Health and Seed Inspection in TORUŃ

9. Detected counterfeits in 2008 - tracing Tracing of counterfeit ppp’s in trade Controls in trading places Controls on farms, end-users Actions taken in 10 voivodships – dolnośląskie, kujawsko – pomorskie, lubelskie, łódzkie, małopolskie, mazowieckie, podkarpackie, śląskie, wielkopolskie, zachodniopomorskie

10. Controls on counterfeits: Nov. 2007 – Nov. 2008 (1) Voivodship Number of proceedings Number of controls in trade Number of controls at end-users dolnośląskie1691 kujawsko - pomorskie21170 lubelskie134 łódzkie101 małopolskie5762 mazowieckie317828 podkarpackie42260 śląskie101 wielkopolskie13541 zachodniopomorskie913754 Total4086092

11. Controls on counterfeits: Nov. 2007 – Nov. 2008 (2) The proceedings are not yet finished – full set of data unavailable Unequal distribution of counterfeits on the area of Poland – some regions much more exposed Frequent presence of counterfeits in the whole distribution chain (from distributors to end- users) – intervening post factum

12. Detected counterfeits in 2008 – the results of tested samples SPHSIS took 50 samples of supposedly counterfeit ppp’s:  38 results of laboratory testing confirmed falsification,  5 samples analysis gave the negative results,  following 7 samples are being tested; Counterfeits concerned 24 ppp’s, mainly herbicides

13. Detected counterfeits in 2008 – the results of tested samples Chemicals contained by counterfeit ppp’s – Unidentified substances – Active substances withdrawn from trade and use – Lowered or exceeded concentration of active substances – Impurities and by-products above standard – Herbicide instead of insecticide – Insecticide instead of glue – Composition as in original product – minor difference in impurity levels (high quality counterfeits)

14. How would counterfeit ppp’s be introduced to the market ? Counterfeit or unapproved products from third countries Legal products - diluted, misplaced (e.g. herbicide in place of insecticide) Falsified packages – frequently difficult to distinguish from original ones Legal or illegal distributors – occasionally cheap products, on place delivery, often without invoices, probably organized crime End users - victims of counterfeits but also likely accepting illegal trade with ppp’s because of competing prices Unknown substances – toxic or nontoxic e.g. paints, powder milk etc.

15. Evidence collecting - where do the signals about counterfeits come from? Complaints of ppp producers and distributors Information from the custom control service Proceedings carried out by police Complaints of ppp users Controls by SPHIS and other inspection services Controls of collected ppp empty packages

16. Detection and proving the counterfeits of ppp - evidence collecting Finding of unknown chemical substance – evidence collecting Sampling and transport Laboratory Analysis - results Documentation inspection Tracing a distribution network Further undertakings – sanctions, court trials, information to end users and distributors Contacting the ppp producer Detailed information on packages, anti-counterfeit protections etc

17. Hazards during and after illegal ppp’ s application Operator and neighbourhood poisoning Direct animal poisoning by uncontrolled drift Natural environment pollution with unknown substances e.g. soil and water resource contamination Economic losses e.g. inefficient control, crop destruction Jeopardy to consumer health by unsafe, contaminated food Animal feed contamination with detrimental effects on the food chain

18. Risks for distributors Contamination and poisoning e.g. leaky packages, Unfair competition, Risk of being involved in organized crime, Economic losses by dropping sales of original ppp’s, Growing unjustified bad reputation of certain ppp’s

19. Risks and problems at evidence collecting Possible contamination and poisoning of inspectors at sampling (especially from huge containers) and sample transportation Lack of traceability, difficulties at the evidencing of trade with counterfeit ppp’s Lack of well protected places for storage of arrested products Uncoordinated, inefficient actions

20. SPHIS cooperation with the other authorities and organizations The authorities and organizations cooperating in fighting against ppp counterfeits: police, prosecutors’ offices fire-brigade, custom service, border guard, State Sanitary Inspection Service (SSIS), Inspection of Road Transport Service, Inspection of Environmental Protection Service, Polish Association of Plant Protection, ppp producers

21. Actions of SPHSIS in cooperation with the other authorities and organizations Meeting with representatives of competent authorities to establish cooperation Trainings together with the representatives of the other inspections / authorities Operational cooperation with police and prosecutors Detailed analysis of claims from ppp distributors and users Informing competent authorities and police about detected infringements if necessary Activities in cooperation with nongovernmental organizations such as PSOR: organizing anti-counterfeit conferences the anti – counterfeit manual

22. Anti-counterfeit measures already introduced Detailed control on borders by custom control service Prosecuting economic crimes by police Detailed case analysis of ppp ineffectiveness or phytotoxicity by SPHISIS Information for operators and users (a leaflet, training, communications in media) concerning the risk of purchasing and applying unapproved ppp’s, which is expected to increase awareness of plant producers Extensive food safety control on pesticide residues by SPHSIS, SSIS

23. Future undertakings - SPHSIS Special procedures of proceeding with unknown substances during sampling and transportation Training of inspectors about procedures and using protective clothes (e.g. gasmasks) Increasing availability and using of protection clothes

24. Future undertakings – producers, distributors Introduced more effective anti-counterfeit protection by industry The improvement of traceability in trade More effective exchange of information with competent authorities about anti-counterfeit protections of products

25. Summary and conclusions Anti-counterfeit strategy can be realized only in cooperation among authorities from different resorts Better coordination of actions is a key issue to improve the effective fight with falsified ppp’s Awareness of hazards should be increased among end users Intensive preventive action is required to keep falsified ppp out of end user range

26. Thank you for your attention! www.piorin.gov.pl