1. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Presentation at HWP workshop in Lillehammer 30 August 2004 Carbon storage in the Swedish forest sector Some results from the study ”Kollagring i den skogsindustriella sektorn i Sverige”, by Staffan Berg, Finn Englund, Anna Jarnehammar, Robert Johansson & Eva-Lotta Lindholm

2. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Annual emissions in Sweden as compared to net removals, using different approaches for 1999

3. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Annual net increase in forest and HWP in Sweden 1990-1999

4. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Carbon stock in standing forests and HWP, 1999

5. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Carbon stock in Swedish building constructions wooden constructionsVolume stored wood (M m3) Stored Carbon (M ton C) Single-family houses46.59.0 Multi-family houses9.41.4 Cottages etc19.33.7 Commercial buildings17.53.4 Other wooden constructions 40.77.9 Total133.425.8

6. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Criteria IPCC- default Stock- change Production Atmospheric - flow Simplicity and transparancy YesAcceptableDifficultYes Data availability YesVariableDifficultVariable Correct description of the real situation Yes Incentives for use of forest products NoYes Incentives for use of biofuels Yes Yes but less than for IPCC-d. and Stock-change No Incentives for trade No Yes No

7. M I N I S T R Y O F I N D U S T R Y, E M P L O Y M E N T A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Comparision between the results of the Swedish study and the UNFCCC technical paper (excess emissions from wood products)