1. Social Network Analysis Christopher McCarty University of Florida

2. Books Social Network Analysis: A Handbook by John Scott, London: Sage (2000). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1994). Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods and Applications by Tom Valente (2010) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts and Findings (2011) Charles Kadushin’s Oxford: Oxford University Pres. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science Linton C. Freeman, Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC (2004). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis (2011) Eds. John Scott and Peter Carrington. London: Sage Publications

3. Web Sites www.insna.org -- International Network for Social Network Analysis www.insna.org http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ -- Tutorial for UCINET/Netdraw http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ http://www.redes-sociales.net/ (Spanish social network listserv) http://www.redes-sociales.net/

4. Software Ucinet (Whole networks) – (www.analytictech.com) ($40 for students, $150 for faculty)www.analytictech.com E-net (Batch processing of ego networks) – (www.analytictech.com)www.analytictech.com Pajek (Whole networks, large networks) – (http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/)http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/ Egonet (Personal networks) – (http://sourceforge.net/projects/egonet/)http://sourceforge.net/projects/egonet/ Vennmaker (Personal networks) Siena (Network modeling, longitudinal) – http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/siena.html http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/siena.html C-IKNOW(Online network data collection) – http://ciknow.northwestern.edu/ http://ciknow.northwestern.edu/ ORA (Whole network analysis) – http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/ora/ http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/ora/ Visone (Whole and Personal network analysis) – http://visone.info/ http://visone.info/ Statnet – http://csde.washington.edu/statnet/ http://csde.washington.edu/statnet/

5. Journals Social Networks Connections Journal of Social Structure American Journal of Sociology, Social Science and Medicine, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Organization Science, Social Forces, Gerontologist

6. Sunbelt Conference 2001 – Budapest, Hungary – April 25-29 2002 – New Orleans, LA – March 1-9 2003 – Cancun, Mexico – March 1-9 2004 – Portoroz, Slovenia – May12-16 2005 – Redonda Beach, CA – February 16-20 2006 – Vancouver, Canada – April 25-30 2007 – Corfu, Greece – May 1-6 2008 – St. Pete Beach, FL – January 22-27 2009 – San Diego, CA – March 10-15 2010 – Riva gel Garda, Italy – June 29-July 4 2011 – St. Pete Beach, FL – February 8-13 2012 – Redonda Beach, CA – March 12-18 2013 – Hamburg, Germany – May 21-26

7. Social Network Analysis is the study of the pattern of interaction between actors

8. Examples of actors and their networks Children in a preschool Employees in an office Customers of AT&T mobile phone service NGOs working in the Amazon Companies in the Fortune 500 Countries in the European Union Baboons in a troupe Organisms in the Chesapeake Bay Web sites around the world

9. Is SNA just a set of tools or is it a theoretical approach? See: http://www.insna.org/PDF/Sunbelt/3_KeynotePDF.pdfhttp://www.insna.org/PDF/Sunbelt/3_KeynotePDF.pdf Social Capital, Structural Holes, Simmelian ties Strong and weak ties Small world Scale-free networks Network diffusion

10. Social Capital “…the ability of actors to secure benefits by virtue of membership in social networks or other social structures” (Portes 1998) Alejandro Portes (1998) SOCIAL CAPITAL: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology, Annual Review of Sociology 1998. 24:1–24 Ron Burt (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas, American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399

11. David Krackhardt (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16: 183-210

12. Structure matters (but is not always enough) In some contexts structure is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for social capital The most beneficial structural position may depend on the topic – Job seeking – Social support Social network evaluation and intervention does not always mean you should connect the dots – Facebook model is to suggest connections – Sometimes there are reasons for not connecting

13. Strong and weak ties The most beneficial tie may not always be the strong ones Strong ties are often connected to each other and are therefore sources of redundant information Mark Granovetter (1973) The strength of weak ties American Journal of Sociology 78-1361-1381.

14. Small world phenomenon Being linked, seemingly by chance, through someone via a friend or acquaintance Stanley Milgram (1967)The Small World Psychology Today 2:60–67. Peter D. Killworth, H. Russell Bernard and Christopher McCarty (1984) Measuring Patterns of Acquaintance Current Anthropology 25:381-397 Duncan Watts and Steven Strogatz (1998) Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks Nature 393 (6684): 409–10

15. Scale Free Networks Scale free refers to the power law structure of networks as the number of actors increases Networks tend to form hubs Entry of physicists into SNA Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert (1999) Emergence of scaling in random network. Science, 286:509-512.

16. Network Diffusion Network structures can often aid or impede the flow of information and the adoption of innovations Diffusion of innovation is the basis for peer to peer network interventions Coleman, James, Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. 1957. The diffusion of innovation among physicians. Sociometry. 20:253-270. Valente, Thomas W. 1996 “Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations” Social Networks 18:69-89. Klovdahl, A. S. (1985). Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: The AIDS example. Social Science Medicine, 21(11), 1203-1216.

17. Two kinds of Social Network Analysis Whole (Complete, Sociocentric) Network Analysis Focus on interaction within a group Boundary defines social space Collect data from members of a group about their ties to other group members Personal (Egocentric) Network Analysis Focus on effects of network on individual attitudes, behaviors and conditions Use attributes of personal network to represent social context Collect data from respondent (ego) about interactions with network members (alters)

18. Sociocentric Network Data From Graduate Anthropology Course

20. Three network components Beth is most degree central Amber is most between central Thomas and Kent are structurally equivalent Removal of David maximizes network fragmentation

21. Boundary definition Boundaries can be defined: – Geographically (a village) – Socially (an organization) – Through connections (snowball) The idea is that actors within the boundary are in some way affected by their social position This excludes the effects from those outside the boundary

22. Missing data In whole networks responses by others about non- respondents can capture structure 70% will in many cases be enough Gueorgi Kossinets (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks 28: 247–268. Costenbader, E. & Valente, T. W. (2004). The stability of centrality when networks are sampled. Social Networks.

23. Two kinds of Social Network Analysis Whole (Complete, Sociocentric) Network Analysis Focus on interaction within a group Boundary defines social space Collect data from members of a group about their ties to other group members Personal (Egocentric) Network Analysis Focus on effects of network on individual attitudes, behaviors and conditions Use attributes of personal network to represent social context Collect data from respondent (ego) about interactions with network members (alters)

24. Personal network interview Identify a population Select a sample of respondents Ask questions about respondent Elicit network members Ask questions about each network member Ask respondent to evaluate ties between network members

25. Personal Network Composition Alter summary file Name ClosenessRelationSex AgeRaceWhere Live Year_Met Joydip_K514125111994 Shikha_K412034112001 Candice_A52024321990 Brian_N23123322001 Barbara_A33042311991 Matthew_A23120321991 Kavita_G23022131991 Ketki_G33054111991 Kiran_G13123111991 Kristin_K42024311986 Keith_K23126311995 Gail_C43033311992 Allison_C33019311992 Vicki_K13034312002 Neha_G42024121990........................

26. Personal network composition variables Proportion of personal network that are women Average age of network alters Proportion of strong ties Average number of years knowing alters

27. Personal Network Structure Alter adjacency matrix Joydip_KShikha_KCandice_ABrian_NBarbara_AMatthew_AKavita_GKetki_G... Joydip_K11110000... Shikha_K11000000... Candice_A10111111... Brian_N10111111... Barbara_A00111100... Matthew_A00111111... Kavita_G00110111... Ketki_G00110111.......................................

28. Personal network structural variables Average degree centrality (density) Average closeness centrality Average betweenness centrality Core/periphery Number of components Number of isolates

29. Boundary definition for personal networks Facebook – West Africa and Asia Time – First grade teacher Require mutual recognition – Book author Living – Dead relative (Genogram) – Jesus

30. Two categories of data collection One mode data – Actors by actors Examples of one mode data collection – Survey; E-mail; Telephone calls; Observation of interaction Two mode data – Actors by events Examples of two mode data collection – Attendance at parties, meetings, funerals; Purchase of items; Reading particular authors

31. Whole Complete Sociocentric Personal Egocentric One mode Two mode Kinds of data

32. Example 1 One mode - Whole network

33. University – Water Management District interaction Objective: Understand structure of interaction between academic and applied scientists Procedure 1: Bound universities by those published in journals in St. Johns Water Management District library in 2008 Procedure 2: Bound WMD by employee e-mails on web sites Procedure 3: Web survey with letter and $1 incentive to all 705 actors Response: 332 completed surveys

34. Visualization of University-WMD network

35. Example 2 One mode - Personal network

36. Acculturation study Objective: Test social network compositional and structural variables as proxies for acculturation Procedure 1: Interviewed 535 migrants in Barcelona and New York City Procedure 2: Each respondent listed 45 network alters Procedure 3: Respondents provided twelve pieces of information about each alter Procedure 4: Respondents evaluated all 990 unique alter-alter ties

37. Visualization of the networks of two sisters Label = Country of origin, Size = Closeness, Color = Skin color, Shape = Smoking Status Mercedes is a 19-year-old second generation Gambian woman in Barcelona She is Muslim and lives with her parents and 8 brothers and sisters She goes to school, works and stays home caring for her siblings. She does not smoke or drink. Laura is a 22-year-old second generation Gambian woman in Barcelona She is Muslim and lives with her parents and 8 brothers and sisters She works, but does not like to stay home. She smokes and drinks and goes to parties on weekends.

38. Example 3 Two mode - Whole network

39. Southern women Objective: To understand the network structure of the debutante network in a Southern town in the 1940s Procedure: Observe which of the 14 annual balls each of the 18 women attended

40. Two mode data matrix

41. Visualization of two mode data

42. Example 4 Two mode - personal network

43. Relation categories in Thailand Objective: Discover mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories in a language for how people know each other to be used on a network scale-up survey instrument

44. Procedure 1: Twenty one respondents freelist in Thai ways that people know each other

45. Procedure 2: Twenty one respondents list 30 people they know and apply 26 most frequently occurring categories

46. Affiliation from all respondents

47. Graph of relationship between knowing categories