Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001."— Presentation transcript:

1 Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001

2 Scope What should we consider as meaning? –How the processing of the input should lead to some update of the information state of the system (domain model, discourse model, user model, bla, bla, bla etc.); Such a representation: –Should support both interpretation and generation; –Should support any kind of multimodal input and output; –Should support the variety of semantic theories;

3 Objectives –Provide interface formats within a MM dialogue architecture Incremental construction (reference interpretation etc.) up to a final representation (e.g. fixed frame à la MUC) or system action/feedback; Should also be a basis for the definition of annotation schemes of MM semantic content. –Specification and comparison of application-specific representations Towards a framework allowing one to compare existing representations (e.g. M3L) or define a new one, while ensuring some level of interoperability between these.

4 What it is not A domain model representation, or an ontology –There is OIL, DAML, Topic Maps etc. A representation of lower-level linguistic or gestural information (e.g. syntax, etc.) –Some features may be percolated, though, or pointed to… A representation of the underlying processes –Focus on the output of what is done by a given module

5 Basic constraints Uniformity (representation for various types of inputs and outputs) Incrementality (usable at various stages) –Before/after fusion, semantic/pragmatic aspects Extensibility –Method for designing schemas (XML or others), rather than one specific schema Clear and explicit semantics

6 Methodology Basic components –Represent the general organization of any semantic structure –Parameterized by data categories taken from a common registry application specific data categories General mechanisms –To make the thing work General categories –Descriptive categories available to all formats

7 Basic components (1) Temporal structures (“events”) –Dialogue turns/utterance –Gestures –Actions on/in the task Referential structures (“participants”) –Individuals and objects participating in an event Comprises spatial structures

8 Basic components (2) Restrictions (on temporal and referential structures) –E.g. Gesture types, Linguistic modifiers, Dialogue acts, etc. Dependency structures (linking events and referential structures) –E.g. Participant roles (cf. AGENT-SOURCE- GOAL), Discourse/rhetorical structure, temporal relations

9 Example Typology of gesture types (registry) –Communicative gestures (wave) –Designation gestures –Shrug –Nod Movement attributes (intensity, etc.) One given format will choose among these, or even define its own categories

10 General mechanisms Links –Internal links –To lower levels (syntactic structures, prosodic cues, gestural trajectories, etc.) –To domain model (types and instances) Alternatives (cf. ambiguities) –E.g. disjunction of internal links

11 General categories Architectural –Producer (consumer?) of the information, confidence, devices Environmental –Time stamps, spatial information (speaker’s position, graphical configurations, gestural trajectories etc.) Interactional –Speaker (user state?), other addressees etc.

12 Combining basic components and data categories Just to illustrate things…

13 Example utterance present wanttogo … sing agent In black: basic components and mechanisms (meta-model of semantic representation) In blue: parameter component chosen from reference registries Categories Values Pointer to speaker’s characteristics Peter: I want to go …

14 utterance <dialAct cert=“0.8”>Order <dialAct cert=“0.3”>Inform present active none wanttogo … I Pronoun sing first … Paris ProperNoun third … Nancy ProperNoun third … agent source goal I want to go from Paris to Nancy

15 utterance Order present active none wanttogo … gestural 2001-11-1:xxxxxx designation I … here adverb there adverb co-designation I want to go from here to there

16 Future work SIGSEM Working group on meaning representations (ACL) –Liaison with ISO TC37/SC4 - linguistic resources Preparation of a working draft –Liaison with Isle –Liaison with SIGMedia and SIGDial –W3C/VoiceXML


Download ppt "Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google