Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Profit Allocation in Urban Renewal – A Real Option Approach

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Profit Allocation in Urban Renewal – A Real Option Approach"— Presentation transcript:

1 Profit Allocation in Urban Renewal – A Real Option Approach
19th European Real Estate Society Conference Edinburgh, Scotland, June 2012 Profit Allocation in Urban Renewal – A Real Option Approach Oliver F. Shyr, Angel Lee, and C. F. Wang Department of Urban Planning National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

2 Background Urban Renewal Results in urban gentrification
Deteriorates housing affordability Accelerates social inequality Is an unfair game between landowners and developers Is not a free lunch

3 Background Urban Gentrification in Taipei

4 Background Housing Affordability in Taipei

5 Background Social Inequality in Taiwan - Poverty Rate

6 Background Social Inequality in Taipei - Gini Index

7 Background What are the public interests related to urban renewal projects? Prevention of multiple hazards (fire, earthquake, flooding, etc.) Provision of open spaces Reduction of traffic accidents Provision of walkways and bike paths Reduction of poverty & crime rates Aesthetic values

8 Background Why is urban renewal an unfair game?
Proposals are often submitted by developers Landowners don’t have complete information of local housing market Tenants can’t participate in urban renewal Shop owners usually can’t keep their shops after renewal

9 Background Why urban renewal projects become free lunches for all stakeholders? Projects are financed based on floor-area ratio (FAR) incentives Who pays these free lunches? High FAR justified by Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) may deteriorate the service quality of public facilities and infrastructure

10 Motivation To estimate both the option values & intrinsic values of parcels in Taipei by taking into account urban renewal restrictions & demolition costs To assist landowners to make the right decisions To modify the rule of urban renewal by setting up new formula for profit allocation games

11 Research Hypotheses FAR incentives should be a good tool to promote public interests as to prevent market failures cause by Potential hazards Social costs associated with poverty, crimes, and traffic accidents FAR incentive creates debts on future renewal practices

12 Literature Review Real Options: Theory & Estimation Approach
Black & Scholes (1973) Merton (1973) Quigg (1993) Real Options: Applications Urban Planning Cunningham (2007) Lee and Jou (2010) Peng, etc. (2011) Real Estate Valuations Fu and Jennen (2008) Grovenstein, etc. (2011) Hedonic Housing Price Studies Rosen (1974)

13 Methodology Urban Renewal Process Intrinsic Value + Real Option Value
Profit Allocation Bargaining Yes Yes Proposal Submission Financial Feasibility Proposal Modification No No Abort Project Delay Project

14 Methodology Real Option Functions Black & Scholes, 1973 Quigg, 1993
C = value of the call option S = stock price E = value of exercise or strike price R = risk-free rate t = time to maturity s = standard deviation of the return on the stock N = CDF of normal distribution d1 & d2 = evaluated values of normal distribution

15 Methodology Cooperative Games Bargaining Games
Profit imputations among landlords and developers Bargaining Games Sequential bargaining under asymmetric information among landlords and developers Project Assessment on Urban Renewal Policy Values of public interests regarding urban renewal practices

16 Methodology Hedonic Functions The functional forms of our models
Log-linear and semi-log functions are pre-specified functions while Box-Cox functions maximize the log-likelihood of the functions within a pre-specified family of functions It is often advisable to compare the results of different functional forms in order to identify non-robust estimates The functional forms of our models Double-log and Box-Cox transformation

17 Methodology Double-log Box-Cox P: housing price,
Z: explanatory variables, D: dummy variables, β: coefficients, α: constant term, ε: random error.

18 The Data The Data Transaction property prices before and after urban renewal projects in Taipei from 2003 to 2011 Makes use of sales prices rather than rents Accounts for most transactions Sales prices reflects future expectations Other data Construction (hard) and soft costs Housing Price Index Sources Department of Land Administration, Ministry of Interior Urban renewal developers Real estate agents

19 Estimation Approaches
Expectations & Variations of Asset Values Hedonic housing price functions Zoning & renewal constraints FAR incentives Risks & Public Interests Related to Urban Renewal Projects Costs of Negotiation (repeated games) Scale of Development (cooperative games) Reject & Resubmit (majority games) Demand & Supply Analysis on Housing Market Assessment of Multiple Hazards Evaluation of Social Costs & Aesthetic Values

20 Final Remarks Our Missions Our Challenges
To help developers & landlords make decisions on urban renewal proposals To refine urban renewal regulations Our Challenges The quantification of risks and public interests associated with housing policy and urban renewal practices

21 Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "Profit Allocation in Urban Renewal – A Real Option Approach"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google