Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Shell-model CI codes and applications Calvin Johnson (1) Plamen Krastev (1,2) * Erich Ormand (2) 1 San Diego State University 2 Lawrence Livermore National.

Published byKathlyn Rogers Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Shell-model CI codes and applications Calvin Johnson (1) Plamen Krastev (1,2) * Erich Ormand (2) 1 San Diego State University 2 Lawrence Livermore National."— Presentation transcript:

1 Shell-model CI codes and applications Calvin Johnson (1) Plamen Krastev (1,2) * Erich Ormand (2) 1 San Diego State University 2 Lawrence Livermore National Lab * = supported by UNEDF UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Summary: * Major rewrite of REDSTICK CI shell-model code * Significant improvement in performance and potential * Hosted mini-workshop on Leadership-class CI codes at SDSU * Physics applications currently underway -> two applications: * study of errors arising from model space truncation * exact vs. Fermi gas calculation of level densities

2 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Past year’s work on REDSTICK: July 2009: P. Krastev joined effort August 2009: Analysis of performance of REDSTICK and modeling parallelization algorithms -> need to reorganize representation of “jumps” Krastev: modeled parallel distribution of jumps Johnson & Ormand: major rewrite of code Feb 2009: revised 2-body version of code finished -- set-up is 10x faster than old version March 2009: further improvements: -- Hamiltonian application is at least 2x faster than old version (fixed bottleneck from old version) -- began implementation of new parallelization scheme April 2009: Implemented thick-restart Lanczos

3 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Key idea for on-the-fly algorithms for the shell model Represent an area by its boundary  Factorization of problem =   Reduces memory load Proton SDs Hamiltonian can be factorized in same way Neutron SDs

4 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 REDSTICK  BIGSTICK

5 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Why “on-the-fly”? Factorization of Hamiltonian -> reduced memory -> larger problem on same machine Comparison of RAM requirements (2-body interactions only) Does not include lanczos vector storage NuclideSpaceBasis dimmatrix storeon-the-fly 56 Fepf501 M290 Gb0.72 Gb 7 LiN max =12252 M3600 Gb96 Gb 7 LiN max =141200 M23 Tb624 Gb 12 CN max =632M196 Gb3.3 Gb 12 CN max =8590M5000 Gb65 Gb 12 CN max =107800M111 Tb1.4 Tb 16 ON max =626 M142 Gb3.0 Gb 16 ON max =8990 M9700 Gb130 Gb

6 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Comparison of RAM requirements (3-body interactions) - Estimate NuclideSpaceBasis dimstoreon the fly 7 LiN max =12252 M100 Tb2.6 Tb 7 LiN max =141200 M760 Tb20 Tb 12 CN max =632M4 Tb 0.07 Tb 12 CN max =8590M180 Tb3 Tb 12 CN max =107800M5000 Tb86 Tb 1 Tb requires approximately 1000 cores (depending on architecture)

7 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 In March 2009 we hosted a mini-workshop on Leadership Class CI codes at SDSU Attendees: Johnson, Krastev, Ormand Vary, Maris Navratil Horoi Ng, Yang An excellent chance to “look under the hood” of our algorithms and share ideas for next-generation calculations; these discussions have led to mutual improvements in our CI codes cooperation not competition!

8 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 Preliminary physics applications (serial so far): * Comparison of exact results with pairing approximations in pf shell (with N. Sandulescu; ran full 52 Fe in 30 hrs) * Calculation of sd shell nuclei in 2hw space to study effects of model space truncation (with G. Bertsch; ran many cases with 20-50M states, approx 1-2 days each) * EFT in atomic gases (with I. Stetcu et al; 4 particles up to 16hw) Applications this fall: * Electric polarizability in A = 6 (with I. Stetcu et al) * p-shell nuclides (P. Navratil) * Isospin breaking and CKM unitarity in pf-shell nuclei (EO+CJ)

9 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 3-Body 12 C N max =6 16 O N max =6 3-Body 12 C N max =6 16 O N max =6 3-Body 12 C N max =8 16 O N max =8 3-Body 12 C N max =8 16 O N max =8 3-Body 7 Li N max =12 3-Body 7 Li N max =12 Comp. Phys. Comm. paper – release of code Comp. Phys. Comm. paper – release of code 2-Body 16 O N max =8 7 Li N max =12 2-Body 16 O N max =8 7 Li N max =12

10 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: effects of shell model space truncation (with George Bertsch) Motivation: Shell-model calculations work in finite many-body space, using either phenomenological fits (a la Alex Brown) or renormalization scheme. Such truncations induce many-body interactions which may not be part of the fit—thus the rms error has an intrinsic limitation. Methodology: Generate “exact” spectrum in large model space (sd + 2p-2h pf + 1p-1h sdg); adjust USD interaction in sd shell in least-squares fit of “exact” spectrum. How much can we reduce the rms error?

11 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: effects of shell model space truncation Do least-squares fit using SVD rms error in g.s. energies rms error in excitation energies monopole vs contact

12 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: effects of shell model space truncation Lessons learned: As expected, one cannot exactly reproduce the “full space” calculation using only two-body interactions in the smaller space (many-body forces induced by truncation) Least-squared fit dominated by a handful of interactions Two “simple” forces do this most of the renormalization: either * isoscalar contact interaction (best); or * N(N+1) (“monopole”)

13 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density Motivation: Many approaches to nuclear level density begin with Bethe’s Fermi gas model, usually with strong, phenomenological corrections. How good/bad is it? Methodology: Compute exact level (state) density with CI code. Using same model space & input Hamiltonian, compute HF s.p.e.s and compute Fermi gas partition function: Invert Laplace transform to get density of states

14 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density

15 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density

16 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density What if nuclei aren’t spherical? Add rotational partition function with parameters from cranked HF

17 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density

18 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density

19 Shell-model CI codes and applications UNEDF Pack Forest Meeting June 2009 New application: tests of a cheap method to compute the level density Method requires further investigation / validation: Are other corrections (pairing/vibration) needed? What about strong shape coexistence? What about spin-cutoff factor? What about spurious c.m. motion? Nonetheless, a promising, cheap method to get level densities

Download ppt "Shell-model CI codes and applications Calvin Johnson (1) Plamen Krastev (1,2) * Erich Ormand (2) 1 San Diego State University 2 Lawrence Livermore National."

Similar presentations

The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.

The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.
A brief introduction D S Judson. Kinetic Energy Interactions between of nucleons i th and j th nucleons The wavefunction of a nucleus composed of A nucleons.

A brief introduction D S Judson. Kinetic Energy Interactions between of nucleons i th and j th nucleons The wavefunction of a nucleus composed of A nucleons.
Cluster states around 16 O studied with the shell model Yutaka Utsuno Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic energy Agency ―Collaborator― S. Chiba.

Cluster states around 16 O studied with the shell model Yutaka Utsuno Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic energy Agency ―Collaborator― S. Chiba.
Lectures in Istanbul Hiroyuki Sagawa, Univeristy of Aizu June 30-July 4, 2008 1. Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States 2. Pairing correlations.

Lectures in Istanbul Hiroyuki Sagawa, Univeristy of Aizu June 30-July 4, Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States 2. Pairing correlations.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-XXXX-12345 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551 This work performed under.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-XXXX Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA This work performed under.
Doing Very Big Calculations on Modest Size Computers Reducing the Cost of Exact Diagonalization Using Singular Value Decomposistion Marvin Weinstein, Assa.

Doing Very Big Calculations on Modest Size Computers Reducing the Cost of Exact Diagonalization Using Singular Value Decomposistion Marvin Weinstein, Assa.
Mean-field calculation based on proton-neutron mixed energy density functionals Koichi Sato (RIKEN Nishina Center) Collaborators: Jacek Dobaczewski (Univ.

Mean-field calculation based on proton-neutron mixed energy density functionals Koichi Sato (RIKEN Nishina Center) Collaborators: Jacek Dobaczewski (Univ.
Dineutron formation and breaking in 8 He 2013 10th Sep. The 22nd European Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics 1 Department of Physics, Kyoto University.

Dineutron formation and breaking in 8 He th Sep. The 22nd European Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics 1 Department of Physics, Kyoto University.
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.

II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES-488272 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA
What are we doing? Large-scale ab initio No-core Shell Model calculations.

What are we doing? Large-scale ab initio No-core Shell Model calculations.
John Daoutidis October 5 th 2009 Technical University Munich Title Continuum Relativistic Random Phase Approximation in Spherical Nuclei.

John Daoutidis October 5 th 2009 Technical University Munich Title Continuum Relativistic Random Phase Approximation in Spherical Nuclei.
CNRS, Saclay, 6 June 2005. The Shell Model and the DMRG Approach Stuart Pittel Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.

CNRS, Saclay, 6 June The Shell Model and the DMRG Approach Stuart Pittel Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.
NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect Bonn, September 1, 2009 Andrey M. Shirokov Moscow State University & Iowa State University Collaborators:

NN interaction JISP16: Current status and prospect Bonn, September 1, 2009 Andrey M. Shirokov Moscow State University & Iowa State University Collaborators:
I. Bentley and S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame, USA Calculation of the Wigner Term in the Binding Energies by Diagonalization.

I. Bentley and S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame, USA Calculation of the Wigner Term in the Binding Energies by Diagonalization.
INT October 28, 2004Mihai Horoi - Central Michigan Univ1 New Approaches for Spin- and Parity-Dependent Shell Model Nuclear Level Density Mihai Horoi, Department.

INT October 28, 2004Mihai Horoi - Central Michigan Univ1 New Approaches for Spin- and Parity-Dependent Shell Model Nuclear Level Density Mihai Horoi, Department.
Nuclear Structure Erich Ormand N-Division, Physics and Adv. Technologies Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This work was carried out under.

Nuclear Structure Erich Ormand N-Division, Physics and Adv. Technologies Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This work was carried out under.
Terminating states as a unique laboratory for testing nuclear energy density functional Maciej Zalewski, UW under supervision of W. Satuła Kazimierz Dolny,

Terminating states as a unique laboratory for testing nuclear energy density functional Maciej Zalewski, UW under supervision of W. Satuła Kazimierz Dolny,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physical and Life Sciences/Physics Many-Nucleon Interactions via the SRG Trento, Italy July 13, 2011 Eric Jurgenson.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physical and Life Sciences/Physics Many-Nucleon Interactions via the SRG Trento, Italy July 13, 2011 Eric Jurgenson.
UNEDF 2011 ANNUAL/FINAL MEETING Progress report on the BIGSTICK configuration-interaction code Calvin Johnson 1 Erich Ormand 2 Plamen Krastev 1,2,3 1 San.

UNEDF 2011 ANNUAL/FINAL MEETING Progress report on the BIGSTICK configuration-interaction code Calvin Johnson 1 Erich Ormand 2 Plamen Krastev 1,2,3 1 San.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google