Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How Bad is Good Enough? Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "How Bad is Good Enough? Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley."— Presentation transcript:

1 How Bad is Good Enough? Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley

2 My Context

3

4 Is mass digitization an answer?

5 Photographs: Considerations for Scanning Strategies Perceived value(s) Preservation needs Reproduction is key to use Description: more detail justified? Concept of archival evidence

6 Digitization of Photos Do it once, do it right? or Just do it?

7 Low-Cost Approach Scan everything (no selection) Minimal keying of existing sleeve data Batch processing No image adjustment No quality control review! Batch validation (automated scripts)

8 Cost/Quality Compromise 800 ppi resolution (for 4 x 5 in.) 16 bit grayscale (not 8 bit)

9 Low-Cost Approach Results 21,000 negatives scanned $1.50 to $3.00 per image

10 Case Study The San Francisco Examiner Newspaper Photograph Archive at The Bancroft Library, U.C. Berkeley

11 San Francisco Examiner News Archive Over 3.5 million negatives 70,000 of these are nitrate film (4x5 in.) 1.5 million or more are acetate

12

13

14

15

16

17 Priorities Preservation (triage & storage environment) Access Long term preservation plan (with support from NEH)

18 What is Doing it Right??? Preservation reformatting is ill- defined in the digital age

19 Mass Digitization as a Tool Access Curatorial assessment & appraisal Preservation? –Assessment –Preserve context

20 Two Work-flows Tested Vendor List sleeves Ship off-site Raw scans + basic metadata returned Batch validation Batch derivatives Load to server Students List sleeves & items Scan in office Raw scans, key data while scanning Batch validation Batch derivatives Load to server

21

22 What did we get for our effort? (Or, How bad is good enough?)

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31 Is that all? (No, actually): –Serviceable production masters –Curatorial review tool –Strategic preservation strategy Context & archival evidence (all) Selected images (very few)

32

33

34

35

36 Preservation Strategy What will we preserve? Full aesthetic value? Context and basic information? Select for Preservation Reformatting 5 % ? 2 % ? Recorded archival context of the whole Consider film-from-digital for entirety of nitrate files

37

38

39

40

41

42 Reiterate Comparison of Scan Approaches High res (1200 ppi +) High bit depth Huge file sizes Manually adjusted Quality control $12-$18 / image High-ish res (800 ppi) High bit depth (16 bit) Large-ish files (22 MB) Batch processed Batch validation $1.50-$3 / image

43 Whats Next? User interface –Assess impact More funding to continue Further assessment of film output approaches

44 Appendix User interface examples

45

46

47

48

49


Download ppt "How Bad is Good Enough? Mass Digitization of Photographic Archives James Eason The Bancroft Library University of California at Berkeley."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google