1. © 2006 Open Grid Forum Inter-Cloud Workshop and Brainstorming Session OGF-29, June 22, 2010 Doubletree Hotel Chicago, Illinois, USA

2. © 2010 Open Grid Forum 2 OGF IPR Policies Apply I acknowledge that participation in this meeting is subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy. Intellectual Property Notices Note Well: All statements related to the activities of the OGF and addressed to the OGF are subject to all provisions of Appendix B of GFD-C.1, which grants to the OGF and its participants certain licenses and rights in such statements. Such statements include verbal statements in OGF meetings, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: the OGF plenary session, any OGF working group or portion thereof, the OGF Board of Directors, the GFSG, or any member thereof on behalf of the OGF, the ADCOM, or any member thereof on behalf of the ADCOM, any OGF mailing list, including any group list, or any other list functioning under OGF auspices, the OGF Editor or the document authoring and review process Statements made outside of a OGF meeting, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an OGF activity, group or function, are not subject to these provisions. Excerpt from Appendix B of GFD-C.1: Where the OGF knows of rights, or claimed rights, the OGF secretariat shall attempt to obtain from the claimant of such rights, a written assurance that upon approval by the GFSG of the relevant OGF document(s), any party will be able to obtain the right to implement, use and distribute the technology or works when implementing, using or distributing technology based upon the specific specification(s) under openly specified, reasonable, non- discriminatory terms. The working group or research group proposing the use of the technology with respect to which the proprietary rights are claimed may assist the OGF secretariat in this effort. The results of this procedure shall not affect advancement of document, except that the GFSG may defer approval where a delay may facilitate the obtaining of such assurances. The results will, however, be recorded by the OGF Secretariat, and made available. The GFSG may also direct that a summary of the results be included in any GFD published containing the specification. OGF Intellectual Property Policies are adapted from the IETF Intellectual Property Policies that support the Internet Standards Process.

3. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Private Cloud Private Cloud Organization A Private Cloud Private Cloud Organization B Cloud Deployment Modes 3 Public Cloud Hybrid Cloud Hybrid Cloud Federated Cloud Federated Cloud Hybrid Cloud Hybrid Cloud

4. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Key Observation Can you enforce membership, usage, and security policies? Do you know who your cloud tenants are and how they will behave? 451 Group identifies Trust and Control as the primary inhibitor of cloud technology, followed by Interoperability, Portability and Licensing (It Is Cloud report, June 2010) Cloud Security Alliance Security Guidelines document listing many security and regulatory issues 4 The distinction between private and public clouds is really a relative distinction between whether you "own" the resources or not -- whether the resources are inside or outside your security perimeter, i.e., your administrative domain.

5. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Agenda & Goals Review some current OGF outreach activities NIST NCOIC SIENA CSA GICTF OGC TMF DoE Brainstorming on how to optimize the outcome What new, relevant cloud work need to get done? Do we have critical mass in OGF to get any of these done? Follow-on Demonstrations? Publicity? (e.g., iSGTW?) What other activities? … 5

6. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Some Current Efforts US NIST Approach FedRAMP: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program Coordinate security requirements; Joint Authorization Board SAJACC: Standards Acceleration to Jumpstart Adoption of Cloud Computing A cloud technology evaluation process with results published on NIST portal EU SIENA Roadmap Meeting Standards and Interoperability for e-Infrastructure Implementation Initiative, http://www.sienainitiative.euhttp://www.sienainitiative.eu With EC collaboration, Brussels, Oct. 25-29, (tentative) 6

7. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Even More Current Efforts GICTF, gictf.jp Global Inter-Cloud Technology Forum Promotion of cloud services and standards in the Japanese market TMF Enterprise Cloud Leadership Council TeleManagement Forum's "catalyst" to accelerate standardization and commoditization of cloud services http://www.tmforum.org/EnterpriseCloudBuyers/8009/ home.html NCOIC.org Network-Centric Operations Industrial Consortium Geospatial Community Cloud effort 7

8. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Cloud-Standards.org An informal group of Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) collaborating to coordinate and communicate standards for cloud computing, networks and storage Wiki: cloud-standards.org Mailing List: groups.google.com/group/CloudStandards Different SDOs bring different but complementary technologies & capabilities Storage, execution models, deployment models, service level agreements, security, authentication, privacy All interested, committed persons and organizations with relevant technical skills can participate Open Cloud Consortium

9. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Follow-on Demonstrations? OGF-30 Brussels, October 25-29, 2010 Supercomputing 2010 New Orleans, November 15-18, 2010 OGF-31 Somewhere in the Spring, 2011 CCGrid 2011 Newport Beach, May 23-26, 2011 9

10. © 2010 Open Grid Forum Brainstorming Results… VM portability independent of OS and language Minimum taxonomy of what to execute Call for support of multiple OSs Give people choice; pricing power OCCI PaaS, snapshotting, monitoring (e.g., nagios) SLAs – auditing Auto expansion of monitoring infrastructure If cloudbursting into public cloud, monitoring infrastructure goes with it Scheduling bulk data transfers Broker models Consistent user I/F across providers Pull out abstract technology from existing OGF work Federated Clouds = Partner Clouds = Peer Clouds 10