Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Transdisciplinary Considerations Among Sustainability Criteria

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Transdisciplinary Considerations Among Sustainability Criteria"— Presentation transcript:

1 Transdisciplinary Considerations Among Sustainability Criteria
With a Focus on the Ecological Macroeconomics of Biodiversity Conservation

2 Spheres of Sustainability
Ecological Economic Social

3 Prehistoric Proportions
Ecological Economic Social

4 Sustainability Institutions
Ecological (Institutions) Economic Social

5 Capacities and Tradeoffs
Ecological Social Economic

6 Economic Growth an increase in the production and consumption of goods and services typically expressed in terms of GDP facilitated by increasing: population per capita consumption

7 K GNP Time Natural capital allocated to wildlife Natural capital
human economy Time Czech, B Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(1):4-14.

8 Some Empirical Evidence:
Causes of Species Endangerment as a “Who’s Who” of the American Economy

9 Endangerment Causes Urbanization Agriculture
Water diversions (e.g., reservoirs) Recreation, tourism development Pollution Domestic livestock, ranching 247 205 160 148 143 136 Czech et al Bioscience 50(7):

10 Causes (cont.) Mineral, gas, oil extraction Non-native species Harvest
Modified fire regimes Road construction/maintenance Industrial development 134 115 101 83 81 Czech et al Bioscience 50(7):

11 Making sense of the Who’s Who with
Trophic Theory

12 Economy of Nature Super- Carnivores Service Providers Consumers Producers (i.e., plants)

13 Producers (i.e., agriculture, extraction)
Human Economy Light manufacturing Heavy manufacturing Service Sectors Producers (i.e., agriculture, extraction)

14 Human-inclusive Economy of Nature
Humans Service Providers Animals Plants

15 With Economic Growth Human Economy Service Providers Animals Plants

16 PDF files for these articles available at The Wildlife Society website: (Follow links to Wildlife Society Bulletin.)

17 ESA Listings and GDP 1973 1980 1990 2001 R2 = 98.4 $10 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5
$4 $3 R2 = 98.4

18 Basic Population Dynamics

19 Carrying Capacity Scenarios
K K-selection Individuals r-selection Time

20 K and r-selected Species

21 Economic Carrying Capacity
K K-selection GDP r-selection Time

22 K and r-selected Economies

23 American GNP, K or r-selected?

24 But, for the sake of biodiversity conservation, it’s not enough to hope
we are K-selected.

25 Wildlife Conservation and
Steady State Economy K To conserve wildlife... GNP ...maintain steady state economy sufficiently below K. Time

26 But what about Technological Progress?

27 Technological Progress
Vernacular: invention, innovation Technical: increasing productive efficiency resulting from invention and innovation

28 KU KT Natural Capital Allocation Revisited GNP Time
X natural capital allocable KT Natural capital allocated to non-human economy GNP Natural capital allocated to human economy Time

29 The Big Hope KU GNP Time K2 K1 Economic growth with technology level 2
X natural capital remains allocable K2 X/2 conserved K1 Economic growth with technology level 2 GNP Economic growth with technology level 1 Time

30 The Great Debate: Is There a Limit?
“Yes” Physiocrats Classical economists Ecological economists Ecologists “No” Neoclassical economists Corporations Politicians

31 Why would there not be a limit?
Substitutability of resources Increasing productive efficiency Increasing human capital

32 White Pine, “Big Wheel”

33 Substituting for white pine, employing more efficient technology.

34 Timbco 435 “Feller Buncher”
Sitka Spruce, Timbco 435 “Feller Buncher”

35 Why would there be a limit?
Carrying capacity Thermodynamics Trophic levels

36 Carrying Capacity Consumers Products Byproducts

37 Thermodynamics Fixed amount of matter Entropy Fixed amount of energy

38 Another look at trophic levels, this time in light of thermodynamics.

39 Economy of Nature Biomass/100 Service Providers Biomass/10 Biomass

40 Producers (i.e., agriculture, extraction)
Human Economy Light manufacturing Heavy manufacturing Service Sectors Producers (i.e., agriculture, extraction)

41 Clear to All Without technological progress, GNP limited
GNP growth faster than technological progress = trouble

42 Unclear to Many Technological progress: raising the bar or accelerating the approach? Does technological progress occur without increased consumption?

43 Consider the Sources Research and development Corporate profit
Economies of scale

44 One More Look at Allocation
KU X natural capital allocable KT Natural capital allocated to non-human economy GNP Natural capital allocated to human economy Time

45 Remember the Big Hope? KU GNP Time K2 K1
X natural capital remains allocable K2 X/2 conserved K1 Economic growth with technology level 2 GNP Economic growth with technology level 1 Time

46 The Apparent Reality KU GNP Time K2 K1 X/2 natural capital allocable
X/2 converted K1 GNP Economic growth with technology level 2 Economic growth with technology level 1 Time

47 Red Herring Alert! Red Herring Alert! Red Herring Alert!

48 The “Information” Economy
What is the information used for? How does one come to afford the information?

49 Fallacy Buster To say that an economy may grow perpetually on a finite land mass is to say that a stable economy may occupy a perpetually diminishing land mass!

50 $ $ = $ $

51 Real Questions What is the limit?
How do we know when we’re approaching the limit? What do we do to prevent breaching the limit?

52 Recommendations Introductions should acknowledge spherical capacities and tradeoffs. Criteria should provide indicators of trading off. Interpretation should include observations of tradeoffs. Does technological progress occur without increased consumption?


Download ppt "Transdisciplinary Considerations Among Sustainability Criteria"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google