1. PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION of Educational Programmes EFFECTIVE MONITORING FRAMEWORK EFFICIENT EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (EMIS)

2. REGULAR: MHRD, SCHOOL OCCASIONAL: NCERT, HABITATION AD-HOC (Household): NSSO CENSUS NFHS NFHS NCAER NCAER DATA COLLECTING AGENCIES

3. Limitations in the System Administrative & Non-Administrative Problems –QUALITY & RELIABILITY –TIME-LAG –DATA-GAPS –UNTRAINED, UNQUALIFIED & INADEQUATE STAFF

4. 33 BACKGROUND DPEP (1994) : MAJOR REFORMS NEEDED GOI, UNICEF & NUEPA JOINED HANDS NUEPA WAS ASSIGNED RESPONSIBILITY: DEVELOP COMPUTERISED EMIS, SCHOOL AS UNIT OF COLLECTION & DISTRICT UNIT OF DISSEMINATION PROCESS INITIATED IN 1994-95 IN 7 DPEP STATES EXTENDED TO ENTIRE COUNTRY SSA 2001 : COVERAGE WAS EXTENDED TO ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL : MIS UNITS: DISTRICTS/STATES NO MORE DATA GAPS: EXTENSIVE DATA NOW AVAILABLE ON ALL COMPONENTS OF UEE TIME-LAG IN DATA COMPLETELY ELIMINATED TWO-WAY INFORMATION FLOW: SCHOOL REPORT CARDS Government REVIEW COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION STATISTICS CONTINUING PROCESS: A FEW CONCERNS ALSO, COVERAGE, CONSISTENCY, QUALITY, DISSEMINATION & UTILISATION OF DATA DISE 2005 DISE 2006: HIGHLIGHTS

5. SSA: DISE SOFTWARE REVISED IN 2001 ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL GRADES I TO VII/VIII IRRESPECTIVE OF TYPE OF SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT INTEGRATED ALL RECOGNIZED INSTITUTIONS FLEXIBILITY TO ADD STATE-SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL/SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES REVISED DATABASE PROVIDES IMPROVED PLANNING, MANAGEMENT & MONITORING CAPABILITIES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS

6. DISE COVERAGE 30 th Sept 2006: RECOGNISED SCHOOLS BLOCKS: 7,115 VILLAGES : 5,62,809

7. Flow of Information

8. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS COULD ABLE TO ESTABLISH COMPUERSIED EMIS UNITS: DISTRICT & STATE LEVELS COMPLETLEY ELIMINATED TIME-LAG IN DATA NO MORE DATA GAPS TIME-SERIES DATA: SCHOOL, CLUSTER, BLOCK, DISTRICT, STATE & NATIONAL LEVEL DISTRICT/STATE/SCHOOL REPORT CARDS ANALYTICAL REPORT Elementary Education Plans are based on DISE Data Random Sample Checking of Data by Independent Agency in each State Researcher across the World are using DISE Data Next

9. DISE 2007-08 (As on September 30, 2007) 34/35 States Submitted Data Tamil Nadu (28.12.2007) HP (31.12.2007) PUNJAB (03.03.2008) Gujarat (07.03.2008) Mizoram (07.03.2008)

10. HOW IS DISE DIFFERENT? WELL STRUCTURED FORMATS WITH PROVISION OF SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES Thorough Checking of Filled-in Formats NO SCOPE FOR MANUPULATION: FULLY COMPUTERISED ERROR FREE, TIME TESTED USER FRIEDNLY SOFTWARE ON LINE HELP LOT OF IN-BUILT CONSISTENCY CHECKS STRONG REPORT & GRAPHICS MODULE INFORMATION FLOW: BOTH WAYS DATA CAN BE EXTRACTED AT ANY LEVEL NEXT

11. FOR THE FIRST TIME EXTENSIVE DATA ON TEACHERS & PARA TEACHERS MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS INCENTIVES EXAMINATION RESULTS NUMBER OF DISABLED CHILDREN STUDYING

12. EXTENSIVE DATA SCHOOL LOCATION, MANAGEMENT, RURAL-URBAN, ENROLMENT, BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENTS, INCENTIVES, MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION, DISABILITIES, EXAMINATION RESULTS, STUDENT FLOW Most of the EFA indicators can be generated

13. Dissemination Print, Electronic, Internet http://dise.in http://schoolreportcards.in http://educationforallinindia.com DISE Publications

14. Description

15. DISE Publications Flash Statistics including EDI Elementary Education in Rural India Elementary Education in Urban India District Report Cards: Volume I District Report Cards: Volume II Progress towards UEE: Analytical Report Progress towards UEE: Analytical Tables Where do we stand? State Report Cards CD containing DISE Publications

23. STATE REPORT CARDS BASIC DATA: 2001 KEY DATA: ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.) RATIO OF P. TO U.P. SCHOOLS/SECTIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ENROLMENT GRADE WISE REPETITION RATE GRADE WISE ENROLMENT OF SC/ST ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY TRANSITION RATE P. TO U.P. GPI PRIMARY GRADES EXAMINATION RESULTS INCENTIVES : NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES (PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR) CLASSROOMS/OTHER ROOM NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE OF BUILDING POSITION OF TEACHERS BY EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION % TEACHERS TRAINED (IN- SERVICE) PARA TEACHERS % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM & SDGGRANT TEACHERS BY GENDER AND CASTE ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS TOTAL GROSSNESS AVERAGE NO. OF INSTRUCTIONAL DAYS AVG. NO. OF DAYS SPENT ON NON-TEACHING GER/NER (PRIMARY/U. PRIMARY) APPARENT SURVIVAL RATE RETENTION RATE % OF TLM & SDG GRANT UTILIZED Back

24. Description

25. DISTRICT REPORT CARDS BASIC DATA, 2001 TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BY SCHOOL CATEGORY ENROLMENT (TIME SERIES) GRADE WISE GER/NER ENROLMENT OF SC/ST INDICATORS BY SCHOOL CATEGORY FLOW RATES (REPETITION RATE, DROP OUT RATE, PROMOTION RATE) ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY TRANSITION RATE COMPLETION RATE CLASSROOMS: AVERAGE NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE OF BUILDING POSITION OF TEACHERS BY EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION EXAMINATION RESULTS PARA TEACHERS GENDER AND CASTE DISTRIBUTION OF TEACHERS ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS % OF TOTAL GROSSNESS % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM & SDG GRANT INCENTIVES: NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES: BY TYPE OF INCENTIVES Continue

26. A FEW AREAS of CONCERN AD-HOC ARRANGMENT FOR DISE ACTIVITIES: Project Mode, Multiple Sources, Frequent Changes, Official Stat OBTAINING DATA FROM ALL RECONGNISED PRIVATE SCHOOLS NOT a SIMPLE TASK UNRECOGNISED SCHOOLS LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY/Low Priority LACK OF DISSEMINATION POLICY DATA UTILIZATION STILL POOR School IDs

27. Challenges Ahead HIGH EXPECTATIONS Obtaining Data from all DISTRICTS/STATES BLOCK REPORT CARDS FURTHER IMPROVING QUALITY OF DATA CREATING DEMAND FOR DISE DATA DATA SHOULD REACH TO ALL DATA USERS AT ALL LEVELS EXTEND ITS SCOPE TO SECONDARY EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION MIS

28. Please log on to http://www.schoolreportcards.in